Cell phone use and risk of thyroid cancer: a population-based case-control study in Connecticut

2018 · Mixed · Low evidence

← Research stream
MixedLow evidencePaper 1973

Overall cell phone use was not associated with thyroid cancer (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.74–1.48). For thyroid microcarcinoma, several long-term/more frequent use categories showed non-statistically significant elevated ORs (e.g., >15 years use OR 1.29; >2 hours/day …

Study snapshot

Publicationmanual · 2018
Study typecase_control
Reported directionMixed
Evidence ratingLow

Abstract

Cell phone use and risk of thyroid cancer: a population-based case-control study in Connecticut Luo J, Deziel NC, Huang H, Chen Y, Ni X, Ma S, Udelsman R, Zhang Y. Cell phone use and risk of thyroid cancer: a population-based case-control study in Connecticut. Annals of Epidemiology, Published online Oct 29, 2018. doi.org. Abstract Purpose This study aims to investigate the association between cell phone use and thyroid cancer. Methods A population-based case-control study was conducted in Connecticut between 2010 and 2011 including 462 histologically confirmed thyroid cancer cases and 498 population-based controls. Multivariate unconditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for associations between cell phone use and thyroid cancer. Results Cell phone use was not associated with thyroid cancer (OR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.74-1.48). A suggestive increase in risk of thyroid microcarcinoma (tumor size ≤10mm) was observed for long-term and more frequent users. Compared to cell phone non-users, several groups had non-statistically significantly increased risk of thyroid microcarcinoma: individuals who had used a cell phone >15 years (OR: 1.29, 95% CI: 0.83-2.00), who had used a cell phone >2 hours per day (OR: 1.40, 95% CI: 0.83-2.35), who had the most cumulative use hours (OR: 1.58, 95% CI: 0.98-2.54), and who had the most cumulative calls (OR: 1.20, 95% CI: 0.78-1.84). Conclusion This study found no significant association between cell phone use and thyroid cancer. A suggestive elevated risk of thyroid microcarcinoma associated with long-term and more frequent uses warrants further investigation. sciencedirect.com

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typecase_control
Effect directionmixed
PopulationPopulation-based sample in Connecticut (2010–2011): 462 histologically confirmed thyroid cancer cases and 498 population-based controls
Sample size960
ExposureRF
Evidence strengthLowConfidence: 78% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

Overall cell phone use was not associated with thyroid cancer (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.74–1.48). For thyroid microcarcinoma, several long-term/more frequent use categories showed non-statistically significant elevated ORs (e.g., >15 years use OR 1.29; >2 hours/day OR 1.40; highest cumulative hours OR 1.58; highest cumulative calls OR 1.20), described as suggestive and warranting further investigation.

Outcomes measured

  • Thyroid cancer
  • Thyroid microcarcinoma (tumor size ≤10 mm)
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "case_control",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "RF",
    "source": "mobile phone",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": "Population-based sample in Connecticut (2010–2011): 462 histologically confirmed thyroid cancer cases and 498 population-based controls",
  "sample_size": 960,
  "outcomes": [
    "Thyroid cancer",
    "Thyroid microcarcinoma (tumor size ≤10 mm)"
  ],
  "main_findings": "Overall cell phone use was not associated with thyroid cancer (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.74–1.48). For thyroid microcarcinoma, several long-term/more frequent use categories showed non-statistically significant elevated ORs (e.g., >15 years use OR 1.29; >2 hours/day OR 1.40; highest cumulative hours OR 1.58; highest cumulative calls OR 1.20), described as suggestive and warranting further investigation.",
  "effect_direction": "mixed",
  "limitations": [],
  "evidence_strength": "low",
  "confidence": 0.78,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "cell phone",
    "mobile phone",
    "RF exposure",
    "thyroid cancer",
    "thyroid microcarcinoma",
    "case-control",
    "Connecticut",
    "odds ratio"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": []
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.10.004
PubMed: Not supplied

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library