Reflection Properties of the Human Skin From 40 to 110 GHz: A Confirmation Study
← Research streamIn measurements of 37 volunteers at 21 body locations using waveguides from 40–110 GHz, statistical analysis showed strong evidence that S11 depends on stratum corneum layer (SCL) thickness and no evidence that S11 depends on sex. Measured S11 for thin vs thi…
Study snapshot
Abstract
Reflection Properties of the Human Skin From 40 to 110 GHz: A Confirmation Study Andreas Christ, Adrian Aeschbacher, Fereshteh Rouholahnejad, Theodoros Samaras, Bernadetta Tarigan, Niels Kuster. Reflection Properties of the Human Skin From 40 to 110 GHz: A Confirmation Study. Bioelectromagnetics. 2021 Jul 21. doi: 10.1002/bem.22362. Abstract Several recent theoretical dosimetric studies above 6 GHz apply generic layered skin models. For this frequency range, new experimental phantoms for over-the-air performance of wireless devices were proposed that simulate the impedance matching effects of the stratum corneum layer (SCL) with a low-loss coating layer. The aim of this study was to verify the skin models by comparing their reflection coefficients S11 with measurements of 37 human volunteers (21 males, 16 females, 5-80 years) at 21 body locations (10 at palm, 11 at arm/face) with different SCL thicknesses, using waveguides covering frequencies from 40 to 110 GHz. Such measurements were also carried out with the phantom material. The statistical analysis showed strong evidence that S11 depends on the SCL thickness and no evidence that S11 depends on sex. The measured S11 values for thin and thick skin can be represented by SCL layers of 15 and 140 μm, respectively. These values correspond well to the assumptions of previous studies. (The cohort did not include volunteers doing heavy manual work.) The phantom material mimics the matching effect of the SCL with deviations from the waveguide measurements of less than 0.85 dB (22%), which confirms the suitability of layered phantoms to represent the electromagnetic reflection/absorption of human skin pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
AI evidence extraction
Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.
Main findings
In measurements of 37 volunteers at 21 body locations using waveguides from 40–110 GHz, statistical analysis showed strong evidence that S11 depends on stratum corneum layer (SCL) thickness and no evidence that S11 depends on sex. Measured S11 for thin vs thick skin could be represented by SCL layers of 15 and 140 μm, and a phantom material mimicked the SCL matching effect with deviations <0.85 dB (22%), supporting suitability of layered phantoms for representing skin reflection/absorption.
Outcomes measured
- Skin reflection coefficient (S11) from 40 to 110 GHz
- Association of S11 with stratum corneum layer (SCL) thickness
- Association of S11 with sex
- Agreement between phantom material and human skin measurements (deviation in dB/%)
Limitations
- Cohort did not include volunteers doing heavy manual work
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "exposure_assessment",
"exposure": {
"band": "mmWave",
"source": "other",
"frequency_mhz": null,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": null
},
"population": "Human volunteers (21 males, 16 females; ages 5–80 years)",
"sample_size": 37,
"outcomes": [
"Skin reflection coefficient (S11) from 40 to 110 GHz",
"Association of S11 with stratum corneum layer (SCL) thickness",
"Association of S11 with sex",
"Agreement between phantom material and human skin measurements (deviation in dB/%)"
],
"main_findings": "In measurements of 37 volunteers at 21 body locations using waveguides from 40–110 GHz, statistical analysis showed strong evidence that S11 depends on stratum corneum layer (SCL) thickness and no evidence that S11 depends on sex. Measured S11 for thin vs thick skin could be represented by SCL layers of 15 and 140 μm, and a phantom material mimicked the SCL matching effect with deviations <0.85 dB (22%), supporting suitability of layered phantoms for representing skin reflection/absorption.",
"effect_direction": "unclear",
"limitations": [
"Cohort did not include volunteers doing heavy manual work"
],
"evidence_strength": "moderate",
"confidence": 0.74,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"millimeter wave",
"40–110 GHz",
"human skin",
"reflection coefficient",
"S11",
"stratum corneum",
"skin models",
"phantom material",
"waveguide measurements",
"dosimetry"
],
"suggested_hubs": [
{
"slug": "5g-policy",
"weight": 0.55,
"reason": "Study measures human skin electromagnetic reflection properties in the 40–110 GHz mmWave range relevant to >6 GHz wireless device exposure modeling."
}
]
}AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.
Identifiers and source
DOI: 10.1002/bem.22362
PubMed: 34289515
Related papers
- RF-induced temperature increase in a stratified model of the skin for plane-wave exposure at 6-100 GHz 2020
- The influence of eyelashes on electric field distribution and absorbed power density in the cornea 2024
- Electromagnetic Field-Aware Radio Resource Management for 5G and Beyond: A Survey (Review) 2025
- Measurement of Ambient Millimeter Wave Exposure Levels around Small Base Stations 2025
- Systematic review on the physiological and health-related effects of 5G-relevant radiofrequency fields (3-4 GHz and 20-30 GHz) [protocol] 2022
- Estimation of the Specific Absorption Rate for a Honey bee Exposed to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields from 2.5 to 100 GHz 2023