In Vivo Functional Ultrasound (fUS) Real-Time Imaging and Dosimetry of Mice Brain Under Radiofrequency Exposure
← Research streamIn anesthetized mice exposed at 1.8 GHz, brain-averaged SAR levels of 2 and 6 W/kg did not introduce significant changes in the time course of the evoked fUS response in the left barrel field cortex during whisker stimulation. The fUS probe could be used duri…
Study snapshot
Abstract
In Vivo Functional Ultrasound (fUS) Real-Time Imaging and Dosimetry of Mice Brain Under Radiofrequency Exposure Rosa Orlacchio, Yann Percherancier, Florence Poulletier De Gannes, Annabelle Hurtier, Isabelle Lagroye, Philippe Leveque, Delia Arnaud-Cormos. In Vivo Functional Ultrasound (fUS) Real-Time Imaging and Dosimetry of Mice Brain Under Radiofrequency Exposure. Bioelectromagnetics. 2022 Apr 29. doi: 10.1002/bem.22403. Abstract This study aims to analyze in real-time the potential modifications induced by low-level continuous-wave and Global System for Mobile Communications radiofrequency (RF) exposure at 1.8 GHz on brain activation in anesthetized mice. A specific in vivo experimental setup consisting of a dipole antenna for the local exposure of the brain was fully characterized. A unique neuroimaging technique based on a functional ultrasound (fUS) probe was used to observe the areas of mice brain activation simultaneously to the RF exposure with unprecedented spatial and temporal resolution (~100 μm, 1 ms) following manual whisker stimulation using a brush. Numerical and experimental dosimetry was carried out to characterize the exposure and to guarantee the validity of the biological results. Our results show that the fUS probe can be efficiently used during in vivo exposure without interference with the dipole. In addition, we conclude that exposure to brain-averaged specific absorption rate levels of 2 and 6 W/kg does not introduce significant changes in the time course of the evoked fUS response in the left barrel field cortex. The proposed technique represents a valuable instrument for providing new insights into the possible effects induced on brain activation under RF exposure. For the first time, brain activity under mobile phone exposure was evaluated in vivo with fUS imaging, paving the way for more realistic exposure configurations, i.e. awake mice and new signals such as the 5 G networks. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
AI evidence extraction
Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.
Main findings
In anesthetized mice exposed at 1.8 GHz, brain-averaged SAR levels of 2 and 6 W/kg did not introduce significant changes in the time course of the evoked fUS response in the left barrel field cortex during whisker stimulation. The fUS probe could be used during in vivo RF exposure without interference with the dipole antenna.
Outcomes measured
- Brain activation measured by functional ultrasound (fUS) response in left barrel field cortex during whisker stimulation
- Interference/compatibility of fUS probe with RF exposure setup
- Dosimetry characterization (numerical and experimental)
Limitations
- Sample size not reported in abstract
- Exposure duration not reported in abstract
- Only anesthetized mice studied; awake configurations mentioned as future work
- Outcome focused on evoked fUS response in a specific cortical area; broader neurobehavioral outcomes not described
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "animal",
"exposure": {
"band": "RF",
"source": "mobile phone",
"frequency_mhz": 1800,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": null
},
"population": "Anesthetized mice",
"sample_size": null,
"outcomes": [
"Brain activation measured by functional ultrasound (fUS) response in left barrel field cortex during whisker stimulation",
"Interference/compatibility of fUS probe with RF exposure setup",
"Dosimetry characterization (numerical and experimental)"
],
"main_findings": "In anesthetized mice exposed at 1.8 GHz, brain-averaged SAR levels of 2 and 6 W/kg did not introduce significant changes in the time course of the evoked fUS response in the left barrel field cortex during whisker stimulation. The fUS probe could be used during in vivo RF exposure without interference with the dipole antenna.",
"effect_direction": "no_effect",
"limitations": [
"Sample size not reported in abstract",
"Exposure duration not reported in abstract",
"Only anesthetized mice studied; awake configurations mentioned as future work",
"Outcome focused on evoked fUS response in a specific cortical area; broader neurobehavioral outcomes not described"
],
"evidence_strength": "low",
"confidence": 0.74,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"functional ultrasound",
"fUS",
"radiofrequency",
"GSM",
"1.8 GHz",
"mice",
"brain activation",
"whisker stimulation",
"dosimetry",
"specific absorption rate",
"dipole antenna"
],
"suggested_hubs": [
{
"slug": "mobile-phones-rf",
"weight": 0.86,
"reason": "GSM-like RF exposure at 1.8 GHz described as mobile phone exposure with SAR 2 and 6 W/kg."
}
]
}AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.
Identifiers and source
DOI: 10.1002/bem.22403
PubMed: 35485721
Related papers
- Investigation of oxidative damage, antioxidant balance, DNA repair genes, and apoptosis due to radiofrequency-induced adaptive response in mice 2022
- The Adverse Effect of Mobile Phone Radiations on Dorsal Root Ganglion of Albino Rats 2021
- The carcinogenic potential of non-ionizing radiations: The cases of S-50 Hz MF and 1.8 GHz GSM radiofrequency radiation 2019
- Evaluation of Genotoxicity of Cell Phone Radiation in Male and Female Rats and Mice Following Subchronic Exposure 2018
- Development and Testing of a Novel Whole-body Exposure System for Investigative Studies of Radiofrequency Radiation in Rodents (NIEHS) 2025
- Effects of Simultaneous In-Vitro Exposure to 5G-Modulated 3.5 GHz and GSM-Modulated 1.8 GHz Radio-Frequency Electromagnetic Fields on Neuronal Network Electrical Activity and Cellular Stress in Skin Fibroblast Cells 2025