Effects of Simultaneous In-Vitro Exposure to 5G-Modulated 3.5 GHz and GSM-Modulated 1.8 GHz Radio-Frequency Electromagnetic Fields on Neuronal Network Electrical Activity and Cellular Stress in Skin Fibroblast Cells

Bioelectromagnetics · 2025 · No effect · Insufficient evidence

← Research stream
No effectInsufficient evidencePaper 2505

Simultaneous in-vitro exposure to 5G-modulated 3.5 GHz and GSM-modulated 1.8 GHz RF-EMF at SARs of 1 or 4 W/kg produced no significant changes in cortical neuron mean bursting or firing rates. In human immortalized skin fibroblasts, mitochondrial ROS was unal…

Study snapshot

PublicationBioelectromagnetics · 2025
Study typein_vitro
Reported directionNo effect
Evidence ratingInsufficient

Abstract

Category: Bioelectromagnetics, In Vitro Research Tags: 5G, GSM, RF-EMF, neuronal activity, skin fibroblasts, oxidative stress, cellular stress proteins DOI: 10.1002/bem.70026 URL: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov Overview With the rapid rollout of 5G wireless networks and continued GSM technology use, evaluating the biological impacts of co-exposure to multiple radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) is increasingly important. This study investigates the in-vitro effects of simultaneous 5G-modulated 3.5 GHz and GSM-modulated 1.8 GHz signals on neuronal network activity, mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, and cellular stress protein responses in both neurons and skin fibroblasts. Methods & Experimental Setup - Primary cortical neurons and human immortalized skin fibroblasts exposed to RF-EMF at SARs of 1 or 4 W/kg for 15 minutes (neurons) or 24 hours (fibroblasts). - Neuronal activity was evaluated via multi-electrode arrays (MEAs). - Mitochondrial ROS was measured using MitoSOX Red. - Stress protein activity was tested using BRET assays targeting RAS, PML, and HSF1. Findings - No significant changes in mean bursting or firing rates of cortical neurons at given SAR levels. - Mitochondrial ROS production in fibroblasts was unaltered by co-exposure. - BRET assays found only minor, threshold-level variations in basal RAS and PML activity; no consistent pattern or significant cell stress response was observed. - No changes in HSF1 activity with RF-EMF exposure. Conclusion Exposure to combined 5G and GSM RF-EMF at SARs up to 4 W/kg does not yield strong evidence of biological effects in neurons or skin fibroblasts in-vitro. The small observed changes are likely within the range of experimental variability, and no marked stress responses were detected under these conditions. Key Points - Simultaneous exposure (4 W/kg, 15 min) does not modify neuronal network firing characteristics. - 24-h exposures at 1 or 4 W/kg do not alter ROS or stress protein outcomes in human skin fibroblasts. - Minor activity variations detected but not consistent nor robust. Note: Even in studies with minimal observed effects, EMF exposures have the capacity to interact with biological tissues, and further research is necessary to fully understand potential risks, especially considering cumulative exposures and sensitive populations.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typein_vitro
Effect directionno_effect
PopulationNot supplied
Sample sizeNot supplied
ExposureRF · 4 W/kg · 15 minutes (neurons) or 24 hours (fibroblasts)
Evidence strengthInsufficientConfidence: 78% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

Simultaneous in-vitro exposure to 5G-modulated 3.5 GHz and GSM-modulated 1.8 GHz RF-EMF at SARs of 1 or 4 W/kg produced no significant changes in cortical neuron mean bursting or firing rates. In human immortalized skin fibroblasts, mitochondrial ROS was unaltered and stress protein assays showed only minor threshold-level variations in basal RAS and PML activity with no consistent pattern; HSF1 activity did not change.

Outcomes measured

  • neuronal network electrical activity (mean bursting and firing rates)
  • mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) production
  • cellular stress protein responses (RAS, PML, HSF1 activity via BRET assays)
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "in_vitro",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "RF",
    "source": null,
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": 4,
    "duration": "15 minutes (neurons) or 24 hours (fibroblasts)"
  },
  "population": null,
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "neuronal network electrical activity (mean bursting and firing rates)",
    "mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) production",
    "cellular stress protein responses (RAS, PML, HSF1 activity via BRET assays)"
  ],
  "main_findings": "Simultaneous in-vitro exposure to 5G-modulated 3.5 GHz and GSM-modulated 1.8 GHz RF-EMF at SARs of 1 or 4 W/kg produced no significant changes in cortical neuron mean bursting or firing rates. In human immortalized skin fibroblasts, mitochondrial ROS was unaltered and stress protein assays showed only minor threshold-level variations in basal RAS and PML activity with no consistent pattern; HSF1 activity did not change.",
  "effect_direction": "no_effect",
  "limitations": [],
  "evidence_strength": "insufficient",
  "confidence": 0.78,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "5G",
    "GSM",
    "RF-EMF",
    "3.5 GHz",
    "1.8 GHz",
    "co-exposure",
    "in vitro",
    "primary cortical neurons",
    "skin fibroblasts",
    "multi-electrode arrays",
    "mitochondrial ROS",
    "MitoSOX",
    "cellular stress proteins",
    "BRET",
    "RAS",
    "PML",
    "HSF1"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "5g-policy",
      "weight": 0.2,
      "reason": "Study involves 5G-modulated 3.5 GHz exposure (in vitro)."
    }
  ]
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1002/bem.70026
PubMed: 41104878

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library