All FCC comments · page 54

2,415 public comments, newest first, 20 per page. Keep scrolling to load more.

#1061Attachment-only filingby Theodora Scarato, Director of Wireless and EMF Program at Environmental Health Sciences » 2026-10-19
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110082237

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082237

Official documents · 5

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#1062Attachment-only filingby Theodora Scarato, Director of Wireless and EMF Program at Environmental Health Sciences » 2026-10-19
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110082236

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082236

Official documents · 6

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#1065Attachment-only filingby Theodora Scarato, Director of Wireless and EMF Program at Environmental Health Sciences » 2026-10-19
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110082232

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082232

Official documents · 6

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#1066Attachment-only filingby Theodora Scarato, Director of Wireless and EMF Program at Environmental Health Sciences » 2026-10-19
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110082230

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082230

Official documents · 6

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#1067Attachment-only filingby Allison Ireland » 2026-10-19
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110082228

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082228

Official documents · 1

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#1068Stop with radiation, it sickens the population.by Beverly Jimenez » 2026-10-19
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110082227

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082227

Stop with radiation, it sickens the population.

#1069Attachment-only filingby Theodora Scarato, Director of Wireless and EMF Program at Environmental Health Sciences » 2026-10-19
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110082225

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082225

Official documents · 6

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#1070Attachment-only filingby Theodora Scarato, Director of Wireless and EMF Program at Environmental Health Sciences » 2026-10-19
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110082221

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082221

Official documents · 6

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#1071Attachment-only filingby Theodora Scarato, Director of Wireless and EMF Program at Environmental Health Sciences » 2026-10-19
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110082219

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082219

Official documents · 6

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#1072I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its dec…by Marian Porter » 2026-10-19
AI summary & topic connections
  • E-Rate & school connectivity: I have no other wified things, and that meant deliberately shopping for a no wifi tv, for example.
  • Sensitivity & health experiences: I experienced fatigue during the day.
  • Sleep & neurological concerns: My sleep had been affected for those one and a half to two years of the smart meter presence - waking, and then taking hours to get back to sleep.
  • Cancer & tumors: The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer.
  • Children, schools & development: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Disability, access & daily life: I wanted to make my home an emr safe place.
  • Towers, antennas & siting: It was at a local meeting about 5G in 2019 that I realised that it might not be the ageing process as I had assumed, but rather, the smart meter on my verandah, that might be causing these rather rapid declining changes to my health.
  • Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Wired connections & alternatives: I have a landline, NBN, and wired ethernet cables for internet.
  • Wildlife & environment: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Exposure limits & testing: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
  • Court remand & agency accountability: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110082217 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082217 I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. And yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. This issue matters to me personally because my health has been adversely affected by wireless radiation, particularly after a smart meter was installed on the verandah outside my bedroom. The meter was installed in 2016/17. Over the approximately two years while it was there my health gradually deteriorated. Eventually, I became more ill than I had ever been in my life. In 2018 I came down with a bug that completely wiped me out for two months, along with a secondary eye infection. I could not work. My sleep had been affected for those one and a half to two years of the smart meter presence - waking, and then taking hours to get back to sleep. I experienced fatigue during the day. There was head pressure and I began to experience 'brain fog'. These things I initially assumed might just be part of my aging process (73 years old). My blood pressure was high when I did go to the doctor for the eye infection. I had been using a shungite sphere between the smart meter transmitting aerial and my bedroom, which I had thought would protect me, however I now feel it was not enough to deal with the quite strong emr transmissions coming 24/7 from the smart meter and…

Read the full comment →

#1074Attachment-only filingby Jacqueline Anderson » 2026-10-19
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110082202

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082202

Official documents · 1

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#1075Attachment-only filingby Theodora Scarato, Director of Wireless and EMF Program at Environmental Health Sciences » 2026-10-19
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110082200

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082200

Official documents · 6

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#1076Attachment-only filingby Theodora Scarato, Director of Wireless and EMF Program at Environmental Health Sciences » 2026-10-19
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110082198

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082198

Official documents · 6

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#1077Attachment-only filingby Charles Foster II » 2026-10-19
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110082197

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082197

Official documents · 1

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#1078Attachment-only filingby Safe Technology Minnesota » 2026-10-19
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110082196

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082196

Official documents · 4

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#1079I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its dec…by Constance Solano » 2026-10-19
AI summary & topic connections
  • Sleep & neurological concerns: He sleeps soundly through the night.
  • Cancer & tumors: The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer.
  • Children, schools & development: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Towers, antennas & siting: We live in the city surrounded by more and more towers.
  • Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Wildlife & environment: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Exposure limits & testing: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
  • Court remand & agency accountability: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110082194 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082194 I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. This issue matters to me personally because: My son is diagnosed with Level III Autism. He is nonverbal and in diapers at 18 years old. He spends his entire day and often night spinning and howling. We live in the city surrounded by more and more towers. However, when I take my son out of the city where there are few to no towers within many miles, he is a different child. The spinning and howling stops. He sleeps soundly through the night. He is so happy. When we return home the spinning starts again. The sleepless nights continue. I've tested this now dozens of times. His brain is completely scrambled in the city but his body feels peace and…

Read the full comment →

#1080It is almost impossible for me to believe that nobody knows (or needs more studies) on the harms of radia…by Colleen B Abbott » 2026-10-19
AI summary & topic connections
  • Towers, antennas & siting: It has always been common knowledge that radiation harms and this 5G is even worse because it is millimeter wave technology that the military around the world were using during the second world war to destroy the enemy!
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: It is almost impossible for me to believe that nobody knows (or needs more studies) on the harms of radiation to ALL life forms except viruses and molds!

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110082192

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110082192

It is almost impossible for me to believe that nobody knows (or needs more studies) on the harms of radiation to ALL life forms except viruses and molds! It has always been common knowledge that radiation harms and this 5G is even worse because it is millimeter wave technology that the military around the world were using during the second world war to destroy the enemy! What does that tell you? If anyone is still ignorant of these issues, I would advise them to check out Barrie Trower who is an expert on millimeter wave technology. Also, Magda Havas is a scientist who is very knowledgeable on this topic. There are countless others. No studies are needed, many of us know the lethality of this monstrous thing!