All FCC comments · page 52

• Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Cancer & tumors: The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment.
• Children, schools & development: The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment.
• Wildlife & environment: The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment.
• Exposure limits & testing: The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment.
• Court remand & agency accountability: Here is one study I believe the FCC should review when addressing the concerns about wireless radiation: Levitt, Lai & Manville (2021): Effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields on flora and fauna, Part 1: Rising ambient EMF levels in the environment – Examined increasing environmental electromagnetic-field exposure and research concerning potential effects on wildlife, plants, and ecosystems.
• Research, evidence & monitoring: Fact: The FCC has not studied long term effects of increased exposure in regards to humans, flora or fauna.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• E-Rate & school connectivity: nnEMF are artificially generated and highly polarized, which changes how they interact with matter, and, in this case, with living tissue.
• Sensitivity & health experiences: A few years later, I started having a permanent headache that wouldn’t go away.
• Sleep & neurological concerns: I would go to sleep with a headache, then wake up with a headache.
• Biological mechanisms & metabolism: Polarization forces ions to oscillate, which, through a cascade of events, forces calcium channels open (voltage-gated ones, yes, you read that right), driving calcium into cells.
• Towers, antennas & siting: I then tried to turn those antennas off.
• Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: I also discovered how "noisy" are WiFi and Bluetooth devices.
• Wildlife & environment: So, my long term goal is to get to know and understand the subject as much as possible in order to create safer products that are respectful of biology, including humans, animals and plants, as I know now that those are affected too.
• Exposure limits & testing: Here is a problem which you guys have the power to solve: as you know, all cells phones are tested for SAR.
• Court remand & agency accountability: Circuit Remand in Environmental Health Trust V.
• Research, evidence & monitoring: Being a product designer, I use a scientific, neutral and intuitive approach on almost all subjects.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Cancer & tumors: The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer.
• Children, schools & development: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
• Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
• Wildlife & environment: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
• Exposure limits & testing: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
• Court remand & agency accountability: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
• Research, evidence & monitoring: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Children, schools & development: We know that silicone valley executives do NOT allow their children to use hand held devices, and we know how the blood behaves closer to wifi signals, we also know how the revolving door behaves in government.
• Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: We know that silicone valley executives do NOT allow their children to use hand held devices, and we know how the blood behaves closer to wifi signals, we also know how the revolving door behaves in government.
• Court remand & agency accountability: the tide has turned, the public servants will not continue to get away from accountability to the people.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Cancer & tumors: Lien : https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.691880 Titre (EN) : Evidence for a health risk by RF on humans living around mobile phone base stations: From radiofrequency sickness to cancer Revue / Source : Environmental Research, 214, 113851.
• Children, schools & development: Lien : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144913 Titre (EN) : Safeguarding children’s health in the digital age: Addressing screen time, wireless radiation and extremely low-frequency non-ionizing electromagnetic field exposures Revue / Source : Position statement (Prise de position officielle) Lien : https://icbe-emf.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/ICBE-EMF-Child-Health-Cell-Phone-Cell-Tower-EMF-Position-Statement-PDF-982026-1.pdf Titre (EN) : Wireless technologies, non-ionizing electromagnetic fields and children: Identifying and reducing health risks Revue / Source : Current Problems
• Pregnancy & reproduction: Lien : https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.17329 Titre (EN) : Impact of electromagnetic field exposure on reproductive health: An umbrella review and meta-analysis of systematic reviews Revue / Source : Middle East Fertility Society Journal, 30, 42.
• Biological mechanisms & metabolism: Lien : https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.732420 Titre (EN) : Role of mitochondria in the oxidative stress induced by electromagnetic fields: Focus on reproductive systems Revue / Source : Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, 2018, 5076271.
• Towers, antennas & siting: Titre (EN) : Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: Implications for 5G Revue / Source : Environmental Health, 21(1), 92.
• Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: Lien : https://doi.org/10.1162/neco_a_01133 Titre (EN) : Development of health-based exposure limits for radiofrequency radiation from wireless devices using a benchmark dose approach Revue / Source : Environmental Health, 20(1), 84.
• Wildlife & environment: Lien : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-021-00768-1 Titre (EN) : Low-level EMF effects on wildlife and plants: What research tells us about an ecosystem approach Revue / Source : Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 1000840.
• Exposure limits & testing: Titre (EN) : Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: Implications for 5G Revue / Source : Environmental Health, 21(1), 92.
• Court remand & agency accountability: Lien : https://doi.org/10.1080/15368378.2021.1881866 Titre (EN) : Radiofrequency radiation-induced gene expression Revue / Source : Reviews on Environmental Health.
• Research, evidence & monitoring: Titre (EN) : Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: Implications for 5G Revue / Source : Environmental Health, 21(1), 92.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Sensitivity & health experiences: 13-84: I am writing because I have general and personal concerns and experience symptoms related to RF radiation and feel strongly regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C.
• Sleep & neurological concerns: Here is just one study I believe the FCC should review when addressing the concerns about wireless radiation: BioInitiative Report (2012, with Subsequent Research Updates): Updated Research Summaries – Collection of scientific research concerning neurological effects, oxidative stress, DNA damage, genetic effects, and electromagnetic sensitivity.
• Cancer & tumors: I understand that the Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer.
• Children, schools & development: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
• Biological mechanisms & metabolism: Here is just one study I believe the FCC should review when addressing the concerns about wireless radiation: BioInitiative Report (2012, with Subsequent Research Updates): Updated Research Summaries – Collection of scientific research concerning neurological effects, oxidative stress, DNA damage, genetic effects, and electromagnetic sensitivity.
• Towers, antennas & siting: This issue matters to me personally because: I live near numerous cell towers and our home is increasingly being surrounded by the installations of numerous 5G, 6G, 8G local telecommunication networks, besides the smart meters of utiilty companies.
• Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
• Wildlife & environment: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
• Exposure limits & testing: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
• Court remand & agency accountability: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
• Research, evidence & monitoring: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

• Attachment-only filings

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.