All FCC comments · page 25

26110083072

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083072

26110083071

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083071

26110083069 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083069 To whom it may concern: Oct. 13 2026 In 2018, we moved into our home in Geneva, Florida. My wife almost immediately started having convulsions with blackouts multiple times daily. Because she had brain surgery before, she went back to her Neurologist. After extensive testing and trying many medications, The Neurologist. could not identify a cause. Nothing stopped the convulsions or the blackouts. Her days were reduced to getting up every morning and sitting down with a bowl of ice water in her lap. She would place a cold, wet washcloth on her forehead between convulsions. This went on all day long for months. She was physically exhausted which caused memory loss and disorientation. During this time, a close friend sent an email containing a video of a woman talking about Smart Meters used by electric companies that might be a fire hazard. We were unaware of Smart Meters. After watching the video, we checked to see if we had one on our home. We did. It was located on the exterior of our bedroom wall, about eighteen inches from our heads where we slept. We looked online for our power company's website. There the Power Company explained that the meter was transmitting (pulsing) RF signals a few seconds a day and was harmless. I was an aviation electronics technician specializing in airborne side-looking radar and infrared photography in the Navy. Upon leaving the Navy, I worked in the Telephony Industry during the development and deployment of wireless telephone systems and telephones. So, I questioned the frequency of signals the Smart Meter was transmitting and how often they were being transmitted. I rented a NARDA SRM-3006 meter. With it, I was able to measure the number of transmissions and the magnitude of the pulses which were in the 10,000 µW/m² range. Also, I saw when the transmissions occurred. The transmissions were numerous and spread throughout the day and night (24/7). My wife had titanium sutures implanted in her head from her previous brain surgery. I was concerned that these signals might be triggering the convulsions. The family shielded another bedroom in our house to shelter her. The…

Read the full comment →

26110083068

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083068

26110083066

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083066

26110083065

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083065

26110083064

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083064

I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on infants and children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. I support only human and non-animals studies. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. I am a healthcare professional. I have seen substantial scientific evidence that has been collected for some time about how wireless radiation has deleterious effects on the public, especially on infants and children, whose cells are turning over rapidly, causing a chain reaction of negative effects on their development. The damage also occurs in adults, animals, wildlife and plants. Some countries have already heeded this information to put into place safety regulations to protect them. I urge the FCC to give meaningful consideration to the experiences and evidence before it and to fully address each of the issues identified by the court.

26110083063

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083063

26110083062

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083062

26110083061

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083061

26110083060

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083060

26110083059

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083059

26110083058

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083058

26110083054

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083054

26110083053

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083053

26110083052

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083052

26110083051

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083051

26110083050

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083050

26110083049

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083049

26110083047

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083047

When will the government take the facts presented and do what's right by the citizens? The radiation is damaging us or killing us. Please do what's right!!