All FCC comments · page 17

2,415 public comments, newest first, 20 per page. Keep scrolling to load more.

#321I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its dec…by Jacob Newgard » 2026-10-22
AI summary & topic connections
  • Sensitivity & health experiences: Prolonged exposure to RF radiation can give me headache, brain fog, heart palpitations, sweating, and a feeling of internal heat.
  • Sleep & neurological concerns: https://bioinitiative.org In particular, these studies are valuable: https://bioinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/sec09_2012_Evidence_Effects_Neurology_behavior.pdf https://bioinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/sec08_2007_Evidence_%20Effects_%20Immune_System.pdf https://bioinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/sec07_2007_Evidence_for_Stress_Response.pdf I have personal experience in this area.
  • Cancer & tumors: The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer.
  • Children, schools & development: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Towers, antennas & siting: The microwave sources that cause these symptoms include cell towers, cell phones, wifi routers, and cordless phones.
  • Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Wildlife & environment: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
  • Exposure limits & testing: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
  • Court remand & agency accountability: Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110083257

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083257

I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. There is published, peer-reviewed data which shows clear evidence of harm from RF radiation that the FCC should be sure to consider carefully and diligently. BioInitiative 2012 has amalgamated many studies, although there are far more available. https://bioinitiative.org In particular, these studies are valuable: https://bioinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/sec09_2012_Evidence_Effects_Neurology_behavior.pdf https://bioinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/sec08_2007_Evidence_%20Effects_%20Immune_System.pdf https://bioinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/sec07_2007_Evidence_for_Stress_Response.pdf I have personal experience in this area. Prolonged exposure to RF radiation can give me headache, brain fog, heart palpitations, sweating, and a feeling of internal heat. The microwave sources that cause these symptoms include cell towers, cell phones, wifi routers, and cordless phones.

#325Attachment-only filingby Kevin Mottus, Outreach Director at CA Brain Tumor Assn. » 2026-10-22
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110083253

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083253

Official documents · 5

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#327Attachment-only filingby Richard Myers » 2026-10-22
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110083251

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083251

Official documents · 4

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#329Attachment-only filingby Kevin Mottus, Outreach Director at California Brain Tumor Association » 2026-10-22
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110083249

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083249

Official documents · 5

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#331Attachment-only filingby Kevin Mottus, Outreach Director at California Brain Tumor Association » 2026-10-22
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110083247

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083247

Official documents · 5

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#332The FCC is a captured agency whose revolving doors include commissioners that are former CEOs, lawyers an…by Jeannie Ferrara » 2026-10-22
AI summary & topic connections
  • Cancer & tumors: The FCC has refused to update their safety standards since 1996, even though a $25 million dollar industry-funded research concluded that wireless radiation raised the risk of brain tumors.
  • Towers, antennas & siting: 30+ countries around the world including the US, UK, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, India, Australia, New Zealand and Brazil have banned Chinese-made 5G technology because of national security concerns.
  • Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: Californians have already paid for fiber optic to their homes in their phone bills over a 20+ year period.
  • Wired connections & alternatives: Wireless broadband is not cyber secure, it's unreliable in bad weather, it's a proven fire hazard, it's untested for EMF safety, it uses much more energy than fiber-optic and its giant equipment is aesthetically offensive.
  • Wildlife & environment: Only fiber-optic cable direct to homes and businesses delivers speed-of-light internet connection that will meet the needs required for next generation programs and services, with no threat to cyber security because it can't be hacked and it poses no health risk to humans or the environment.
  • Exposure limits & testing: The FCC has refused to update their safety standards since 1996, even though a $25 million dollar industry-funded research concluded that wireless radiation raised the risk of brain tumors.
  • Court remand & agency accountability: The FCC is a captured agency whose revolving doors include commissioners that are former CEOs, lawyers and lobbyists of the telecom industry.
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: The FCC has refused to update their safety standards since 1996, even though a $25 million dollar industry-funded research concluded that wireless radiation raised the risk of brain tumors.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110083246 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083246 The FCC is a captured agency whose revolving doors include commissioners that are former CEOs, lawyers and lobbyists of the telecom industry. The FCC has refused to update their safety standards since 1996, even though a $25 million dollar industry-funded research concluded that wireless radiation raised the risk of brain tumors. Those 1996 safety standards considered only the thermal effects of wireless radiation for brief exposure...no long term exposure to the exponentially stronger electromagnetic radiation of today's technologies. In August 2021, the FCC was ordered to update their safety standards in the federal case Environmental Health Trust,et. al. V FCC supported by over 11,000 scientific health and safety studies. Yet the wireless industry has proceeded as if this ruling never took place. Updated safety standards for human health are long overdue and must be integrated into systems to protect Americans NOW. The world's largest insurance companies have responded by excluding any liability coverage for claims "directly or indirectly arising out of, resulting from, or contributed to, by electromagnetic fields, electromagnetic radiation, electromagnetism, radio waves or noise." Lloyds of London and Swiss Reinsurance Company have put wireless radiation in the highest risk category, next to smoking and asbestos. 30+ countries around the world including the US, UK, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, India, Australia, New Zealand and Brazil have banned Chinese-made 5G technology because of national security concerns. Wireless broadband is not cyber secure, it's unreliable in bad weather, it's a proven fire hazard, it's untested for EMF safety, it uses much more energy than fiber-optic and its giant equipment is aesthetically offensive. Only fiber-optic cable direct to homes and businesses delivers speed-of-light internet connection that will meet the needs required for next generation programs and services, with no threat to cyber security because it can't be hacked and it poses no health risk to humans or the environment. Californians have already paid for fiber optic to their homes in their phone…

Read the full comment →

#333I have a friend who is sensitive to wireless, she can feel it, and is unable to sleep near any RF like ce…by Mary Johnson » 2026-10-22
AI summary & topic connections
  • Sleep & neurological concerns: I have a friend who is sensitive to wireless, she can feel it, and is unable to sleep near any RF like cell towers, wifi routers, cellphones, and more.
  • Children, schools & development: There are people who are at risk most for health issues including children, and more research and transparency is needed now.
  • Towers, antennas & siting: I have a friend who is sensitive to wireless, she can feel it, and is unable to sleep near any RF like cell towers, wifi routers, cellphones, and more.
  • Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices: I have a friend who is sensitive to wireless, she can feel it, and is unable to sleep near any RF like cell towers, wifi routers, cellphones, and more.
  • Exposure limits & testing: I am very concerned for the lack of science, studies and protocols to protect the public’s health, and that no real third party testing, science or disclosure about health has been done or shared for over 30 years.
  • Research, evidence & monitoring: I am very concerned for the lack of science, studies and protocols to protect the public’s health, and that no real third party testing, science or disclosure about health has been done or shared for over 30 years.

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110083245

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083245

I have a friend who is sensitive to wireless, she can feel it, and is unable to sleep near any RF like cell towers, wifi routers, cellphones, and more. I have seen this have a huge negative impact on her life and health, and she is unable to travel much and often has to drive distances to do normal activities. I am very concerned for the lack of science, studies and protocols to protect the public’s health, and that no real third party testing, science or disclosure about health has been done or shared for over 30 years. It’s hard to believe that we have been in the dark about safety, health and wireless exposure all this time, and that needs to change right now. There are people who are at risk most for health issues including children, and more research and transparency is needed now. Please make current testing, funding and appropriate scientific research required starting now, and public health conversations mandatory and mainstream. Corporations shouldn’t decide what’s safe for us, science and health should be the main focus, and the public process should be the priority. We need to closely examine non-ionizing wireless radiation and all RF. European and Scandinavian countries have done this- they prohibit cell towers near schools and homes for a reason. We need to follow their example. Put science and safety first before profit. Thank you. I am attaching relevant articles and studies: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/cardiovascular-medicine/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2025.1499499/full https://bioinitiative.org/research-summaries/ ttps://www.techsafeschools.org/science https://www.babysafeproject.org/science https://mdsafetech.org/conversion-and-exposure-limits-EMREMF/

#334Attachment-only filingby Kevin Mottus, Outreach Director at CA Brain Tumor Assn. » 2026-10-22
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110083244

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083244

Official documents · 5

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#335Attachment-only filingby Kevin Mottus, Outreach Director at California Brain Tumor Association » 2026-10-22
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110083243

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083243

Official documents · 5

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#336Attachment-only filingby Kevin Mottus, Outreach Director at CA Brain Tumor Assn. » 2026-10-22
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110083242

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083242

Official documents · 5

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#337Attachment-only filingby Kevin Mottus, Outreach Director at California Brain Tumor Association » 2026-10-22
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110083241

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083241

Official documents · 5

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#338Attachment-only filingby Kevin Mottus, Outreach Director CA Brain Tumor Assn. » 2026-10-22
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110083240

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083240

Official documents · 12

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.

#340Attachment-only filingby Kevin Mottus, Outreach Director at California Brain Tumor Association » 2026-10-22
AI summary & topic connections

AI-reviewed source analysis of the original text, not verified medical findings. Attachments are not reviewed.

Original comment · unedited text

26110083237

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110083237

Official documents · 5

Documents open from the official FCC ECFS record. Their contents are not part of the topic matching.