AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110078965
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110078965
All FCC comments · page 102
2,415 public comments, newest first, 20 per page. Keep scrolling to load more.
AI summary & topic connections
- Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices:
When very overweight and no longer losing weight, my nutritionist recommended that I consider turning off all my computer and bedroom power every night, making my landlines corded instead of wireless, (I didn't have a smart phone), and make all computer technology corded with EMF protected cords from Less EMF.
- Wired connections & alternatives:
When very overweight and no longer losing weight, my nutritionist recommended that I consider turning off all my computer and bedroom power every night, making my landlines corded instead of wireless, (I didn't have a smart phone), and make all computer technology corded with EMF protected cords from Less EMF.
- Wildlife & environment:
In other words, he suspected my high EMF environment (like most Americans) was causing weight gain.
- Research, evidence & monitoring:
At that point, I spent the money and bought expensive meters and studied EMFs.
Original comment · unedited text
26110078953
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110078953
When very overweight and no longer losing weight, my nutritionist recommended that I consider turning off all my computer and bedroom power every night, making my landlines corded instead of wireless, (I didn't have a smart phone), and make all computer technology corded with EMF protected cords from Less EMF. In other words, he suspected my high EMF environment (like most Americans) was causing weight gain. I was eating a diet that normally allowed me to lose weight fast, but it had stalled. After 3 weeks of dramatically reducing home EMFs, my daily weight loss restarted and continued when the only thing I changed was emf exposure-not diet or exercise. At that point, I spent the money and bought expensive meters and studied EMFs.
AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110078943
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110078943
Official documents · 2
AI summary & topic connections
- Sensitivity & health experiences:
My son is complaining of the 5Guw that is causing him to have sleepiness nights and headaches on campus in Panama City.
- Sleep & neurological concerns:
My son is complaining of the 5Guw that is causing him to have sleepiness nights and headaches on campus in Panama City.
- Children, schools & development:
My son is complaining of the 5Guw that is causing him to have sleepiness nights and headaches on campus in Panama City.
- Towers, antennas & siting:
I personally can not handle 5G as it makes me sick and gives me headaches with dizziness.
Original comment · unedited text
26110078940
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110078940
My son is complaining of the 5Guw that is causing him to have sleepiness nights and headaches on campus in Panama City. I personally can not handle 5G as it makes me sick and gives me headaches with dizziness.
AI summary & topic connections
- Research, evidence & monitoring:
See paper, "Safety of Wireless Technologies--The Scientific View", which explains the connection between wireless exposures and chronic illnesses identified by the U.S.
Original comment · unedited text
26110078917
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110078917
See paper, "Safety of Wireless Technologies--The Scientific View", which explains the connection between wireless exposures and chronic illnesses identified by the U.S. Navy Office of Medical Research in 1971, also explaining the umbrella mechanism of action that can explain the diverse biological and health effects. https://manhattanneighbors.org/safety-of-wireless-technologies-the-scientific-view/
AI summary & topic connections
- Sleep & neurological concerns:
Exposure to emf's also is proven to affect our children's concentration, wildlife, and even bees ability to return to their hives.
- Children, schools & development:
Our children and our lives must be protected from this reckless exposure.
- Towers, antennas & siting:
With cell towers (large or small cells) near homes and in neighborhoods and schools, our children are in danger.
- Wildlife & environment:
Exposure to emf's also is proven to affect our children's concentration, wildlife, and even bees ability to return to their hives.
- Court remand & agency accountability:
Exposure to emfs must be thoroughly investigated through research done not by technology funded research but by scientists with no conflict of interest.
- Research, evidence & monitoring:
Exposure to emfs must be thoroughly investigated through research done not by technology funded research but by scientists with no conflict of interest.
Original comment · unedited text
26110078912
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110078912
I have a good friend who must live with shielding from emf fabric due to being so sick that she cannot function. Exposure to emfs must be thoroughly investigated through research done not by technology funded research but by scientists with no conflict of interest. Our children and our lives must be protected from this reckless exposure. With cell towers (large or small cells) near homes and in neighborhoods and schools, our children are in danger. Exposure to emf's also is proven to affect our children's concentration, wildlife, and even bees ability to return to their hives. Do you want a cell tower near your child's window where they sleep and in neighborhoods where children walk and play? Please be wise halt this madness and provide research that is done with integrity and that is not funded by the tech companies who profit from additional cell towers being installed. Thank you,
AI summary & topic connections
- Sensitivity & health experiences:
exposure routinely causes me debilitating migraine headaches and cardiac palpitations necessitating bedrest and missing work.
Original comment · unedited text
26110078907
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110078907
exposure routinely causes me debilitating migraine headaches and cardiac palpitations necessitating bedrest and missing work. I urge you to monitor health affects and lower radiant levels.
AI summary & topic connections
- Cancer & tumors:
Several studies done in several countries have all concluded using cell phones increases the risk of cancer.
- Towers, antennas & siting:
I strongly oppose cell towers within 100 miles of any population.
- Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices:
I also oppose smart meters.
- Wildlife & environment:
Cell towers disrupt other living organisms, particularly bees, by decreasing their populations and disrupting their form of communication and flying patterns.
- Research, evidence & monitoring:
Several studies done in several countries have all concluded using cell phones increases the risk of cancer.
Original comment · unedited text
26110078881
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110078881
I strongly oppose cell towers within 100 miles of any population. I also oppose smart meters. We live in a townhouse that has 6 smart meters within 6 feet of our bedroom. Since the meters have been installed, we have suffered significant health issues that have disappeared when we stay overnight somewhere else. Several studies done in several countries have all concluded using cell phones increases the risk of cancer. Several people have reported ill effects from living close to a cell tower. Cell towers disrupt other living organisms, particularly bees, by decreasing their populations and disrupting their form of communication and flying patterns. I do not consent to cell towers being anywhere near where people inhabit.
AI summary & topic connections
- Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices:
I am allergic to all of the new smart meters, streetlights, wireless and the Arc GIS that surrounds me.
Original comment · unedited text
26110078879
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110078879
I am allergic to all of the new smart meters, streetlights, wireless and the Arc GIS that surrounds me. When the smart meter was put on my house I was standing near it in the first 7 days, and I felt like something like a breeze blew through me. I felt like I was being cooked. Then the utility moved the meter to the backyard and one day I was mowing the lawn and I got too close and passed out. They finally took the sending unit off. After the streetlights went into my neighborhood, I started to feel sicker. My neighbors started having problems and a nice guy just left his family because he did not feel right or well. He didn't want to harm his family, so he left.
AI summary & topic connections
- Sensitivity & health experiences:
My legs are in a great deal of pain.
- Children, schools & development:
I do not want to continue to see my grandchildren and great grandchildren being harmed.
- Biological mechanisms & metabolism:
My husband has metabolic syndrome from all of this, and now he is having symptoms of EMR-s.
- Disability, access & daily life:
If my husband gets so sick he can't work, then what?
- Towers, antennas & siting:
More towers that we know now are toxic and now this Arc GIS Surveillance System has been fired up in my city and I am having major issues with my thyroid, my feet, ankles and legs are swelling and have blisters.
- Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices:
This included taking the smart meter off the house.
- Wildlife & environment:
Year after year more wireless "things" make it into the environment.
- Exposure limits & testing:
There is no oversight and no testing with mass spectrometers.
- Court remand & agency accountability:
There is no accountability.
Original comment · unedited text
26110078874 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110078874 When wireless started, I began not to feel well. Year after year more wireless "things" make it into the environment. Every year I feel worse than the year before. I have been forced to spend thousands of dollars to try to protect my health. More towers that we know now are toxic and now this Arc GIS Surveillance System has been fired up in my city and I am having major issues with my thyroid, my feet, ankles and legs are swelling and have blisters. My legs are in a great deal of pain. This all started after September 6, 2026. After the Arc GIS was installed and fired up. My hair is falling out, and I have a metal plate behind my thyroid I feel like my thyroid is being cooked and my esophagus is burning. I cannot eat solid foods because it hurts too much. I wake in the morning and go to the kitchen where I immediately feel the LED streetlights that are more powerful than ever. I have fainted in my house, had heart attacks and strokes because of streetlights that are apparently operating above 8G. I can read the signals from the streetlights I read in town, but I can't read the LED streetlights on my street. I talked to Scott McCollough about this and was told some of the streetlights are now operating at 9 or 10G. This is a death sentence for me because I have EMR-s, a well under the house and a metal plate in my neck. I have no life. I cannot go where I like and I cannot do the things I would like to be able to do once again. I would like to be able to work so I can pay my bills, but I can't because of all of the toxicities in every building and street and highway. I do not feel safe in my house. I feel like and experiment and a target. I am in a great deal of physical pain and suffering greatly. I would like all of this turned off before I expire. I should not feel the way I do, and I am so angry this is potentially ending my life. I am not enjoying this one bit. My husband has metabolic syndrome from all of this, and now he is having symptoms of EMR-s. I pray he doesn't go down because then we are really screwed. If my husband gets so sick he can't work, then what? I asked AI if all of the wireless was…
AI summary & topic connections
- Sensitivity & health experiences:
I have self-diagnosed EHS (Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity Syndrome).
- Sleep & neurological concerns:
After 20 minutes of exposure to AMI technology (within 30-40 feet), or RF/EMF, I start to experience mood disorders, neurological problems, and pain.
- Towers, antennas & siting:
I choose to live in a rural area away from wifi hotspots, cell phone towers, and 5G antennas.
- Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices:
I choose to live in a rural area away from wifi hotspots, cell phone towers, and 5G antennas.
Original comment · unedited text
26110078872
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110078872
I have self-diagnosed EHS (Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity Syndrome). I choose to live in a rural area away from wifi hotspots, cell phone towers, and 5G antennas. And the home I live in has an analogue meter instead of an AMI (Smart meter). After 20 minutes of exposure to AMI technology (within 30-40 feet), or RF/EMF, I start to experience mood disorders, neurological problems, and pain. This includes anger, anxiety, and what feels like needles poking into my brain. After about 30-60min of exposure, my symptoms increase to include panic attacks, neck and shoulder pain, dizziness, and suicidal thoughts. Because of the prevalence of RF/EMF, I cannot be inside a mall or large grocery store for more than 30 minutes before the pain/dizziness begins. I cannot be inside smaller businesses, such as restaurants, libraries, and doctor offices, for more than an hour. I cannot hang out at the homes of friends and family unless I stay 30-40 feet away from their smart meters and RF/EMF emitting devices. I cannot use a smart phone, nor can I be around other peoples’ smart phones while in use. And when I use my flip phone to make/receive calls, I have to hold it 2 feet away from my head. And I cannot live within one mile of a cell phone tower. In the past, I’ve bought several different RF/EMF blocking materials and devices to shield myself from this radiation, but they didn’t work. I recognize that I am abnormally sensitive. I attribute that sensitivity to the 2 medical conditions I’ve been diagnosed with: The first is dysautonomia (an impaired autonomic nervous system), and second, I have myalgic encephalomyelitis, aka ME, (a chronic low-grade inflammation in my brain). Sensitive individuals like myself should probably be taken seriously. We are the canaries in the coal mine: an early indicator of potential danger. But...I’ve noticed that the vast majority of the information of EHS, on the internet, is derogatory. Some websites have suggested that suffers, like me, are mentally ill, or that we are “making it up.” This is a painful reality, but I try to remind myself that this is how it goes with new illnesses until enough public awareness is achieved. Jack Dorsy (Twitter founder) is also a sufferer – maybe he will help raise awareness someday.
AI summary & topic connections
- Sensitivity & health experiences:
This issue matters to me personally because my son and I often have tinniutus and head pressure/migraines from the wireless technologies that plague our home.
- Cancer & tumors:
The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer.
- Children, schools & development:
Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
- Towers, antennas & siting:
We can literally feel the uncomfortable frequencies driving past the cell towers or being near a smart meter.
- Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices:
Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
- Wildlife & environment:
Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
- Exposure limits & testing:
Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
- Court remand & agency accountability:
Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
- Research, evidence & monitoring:
Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
Original comment · unedited text
26110078870 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110078870 I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. This issue matters to me personally because my son and I often have tinniutus and head pressure/migraines from the wireless technologies that plague our home. We turn off our wireless at night, which has helped to a point, but are still surrounded by many neighbors who leave theirs on 24/7. We often do not feel well the longer we are on our cell phones and laptop because of such direct exposure of wireless frequencies. We can literally feel the uncomfortable frequencies driving past the cell towers or being near a smart meter. The wireless frequencies are disturbing the cells within our bodies because we are made of frequencies as well. It feels…
AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110078866
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110078866
Official documents · 1
AI summary & topic connections
- Towers, antennas & siting:
Many studies have been done that show the damage can be severe, especially for higher radiation levels such as 5G.
- Wildlife & environment:
All these forms of radiation damage not only humans, but also domestic animals, wildlife, and even plants.
- Research, evidence & monitoring:
Many studies have been done that show the damage can be severe, especially for higher radiation levels such as 5G.
Original comment · unedited text
26110078860
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110078860
It is long past time to make sure that we are all protected from electromagnetic fields and wireless radiation. Many studies have been done that show the damage can be severe, especially for higher radiation levels such as 5G. The next generation that is being proposed, 6 G and higher, will be even worse. Some people are more seriously affected than others, but already it is hard for those most affected to find places where they can be comfortable. I have several friends who are immediately affected by the presence of cell towers and other emitting devices. However, even those who are not aware of it are being affected. All these forms of radiation damage not only humans, but also domestic animals, wildlife, and even plants. It would be nice if industry was more capable of restraining itself or if education about the dangers wasn’t being smothered by monetary influences, but since that is not proving to be the case, we need laws and regulations to stop the increasing prevalence of radiation before we do further damage to ourselves and our planet.
AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110078856
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110078856
The science is clear, verifiable, and indisputable; wireless radiation is harmful to human health. Do not put the profits of big tech over the health and well-being of USA citizens. Be on the right side of history. Do not align with and protect corporate greed.
AI summary & topic connections
- Sensitivity & health experiences:
Many salon owners say clients hair and symptoms similar.
- Cancer & tumors:
The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer.
- Children, schools & development:
Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
- Towers, antennas & siting:
With that being said 29072 has over 62 cell towers of all kinds within a three mile radius.
- Wi-Fi, meters & wireless devices:
Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
- Wildlife & environment:
Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
- Exposure limits & testing:
Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
- Court remand & agency accountability:
Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines.
- Research, evidence & monitoring:
Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices.
Original comment · unedited text
26110078850 https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110078850 I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The Court directed the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect humans against harmful effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer. Specifically, the court required the FCC to address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices and technological developments, impacts on the environment, and the adequacy of the FCC’s testing procedures for cell phones and other portable devices. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. This issue matters to me personally because over the last several years, I’ve noticed trees dying, all my roses have died. My personal health has changed by lower energy, hair suddenly becoming thinner and low energy and brain feeling like it’s being zapped. Many salon owners say clients hair and symptoms similar. As an adult our bodies are feeling it, imagine children. It’s changing their minds and altering their behaviors and energy levels. Now all the nano particles in air, water, foods which we have no idea, then metals in them react to radiation. It’s logical. Even our animals are sensing it with lethargy waking at night (just like humans).…
AI summary & topic connections
- Children, schools & development:
It's a well documented scientific fact that wireless radiation of all kinds is dangerous for a myriad of reasons and hasn't been held to the scrutiny it should, considering it's impact on all adults and especially children with growing brains and bodies.
- Exposure limits & testing:
There hasn't been adequate safety testing or accountability by those who push it's unlimited use.
- Court remand & agency accountability:
There hasn't been adequate safety testing or accountability by those who push it's unlimited use.
- Research, evidence & monitoring:
It's a well documented scientific fact that wireless radiation of all kinds is dangerous for a myriad of reasons and hasn't been held to the scrutiny it should, considering it's impact on all adults and especially children with growing brains and bodies.
Original comment · unedited text
26110078840
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110078840
It's a well documented scientific fact that wireless radiation of all kinds is dangerous for a myriad of reasons and hasn't been held to the scrutiny it should, considering it's impact on all adults and especially children with growing brains and bodies. There hasn't been adequate safety testing or accountability by those who push it's unlimited use. This is unbelievable in 2026, since it's dangers have been well known for years, falling on mainly deaf ears. Please do something before more harm is done!
AI summary & topic connections
- Children, schools & development:
EMFs are a grave concern for my (our) children's future health.
- Court remand & agency accountability:
Disappointed to know that the FCC is guilty of ignoring 11,000 pages of evidence of harm.
Original comment · unedited text
26110078839
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110078839
EMFs are a grave concern for my (our) children's future health. Disappointed to know that the FCC is guilty of ignoring 11,000 pages of evidence of harm. You have the evidence. Please address.
AI summary & topic connections
Original comment · unedited text
26110078837
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110078837
Official documents · 1
AI summary & topic connections
- Wildlife & environment:
Accordingly, I strongly urge the Commission to, under the weight of the scientific evidence, find that the current RF exposure limits are insufficient to protect public health and the environment.
- Exposure limits & testing:
Accordingly, I strongly urge the Commission to, under the weight of the scientific evidence, find that the current RF exposure limits are insufficient to protect public health and the environment.
- Research, evidence & monitoring:
I have been reactive to wireless radiation and I urge you to review the scientific evidence in full.
Original comment · unedited text
26110078836
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110078836
I am a member of the public concerned with the unaddressed potential health and environmental risks of radiofrequency (RF) radiation from wireless infrastructure and devices. I have been reactive to wireless radiation and I urge you to review the scientific evidence in full. Accordingly, I strongly urge the Commission to, under the weight of the scientific evidence, find that the current RF exposure limits are insufficient to protect public health and the environment. They should be lowered to reflect the science previously disregarded by the Commission.
Loading more comments…