Samsung Galaxy A36 vs Samsung Galaxy A35: SAR comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A36 lists the lower head sar, cellular only (us): 0.70 W/kg vs 0.80 W/kg for the Samsung Galaxy A35 (13% lower). Reported SAR values in W/kg; lower is shaded green and higher red within each row, for comparison only.
Side-by-side SAR values
| Measurement | Samsung Galaxy A36 | Samsung Galaxy A35 |
|---|---|---|
| Head SAR, cellular only (US) | 0.70 W/kg | 0.80 W/kg |
| Body SAR, cellular only (US) | 1.24 W/kg | 0.76 W/kg |
| Head SAR, Wi-Fi + cellular (US) | 1.59 W/kg | 1.42 W/kg |
| Body SAR, Wi-Fi + cellular (US) | 1.59 W/kg | 1.16 W/kg |
| Hotspot SAR, cellular only (US) | 1.24 W/kg | 0.97 W/kg |
| Hotspot SAR, Wi-Fi + cellular (US) | 1.59 W/kg | 1.59 W/kg |
| Display: Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Display: Size | 6.64 inches, 108.2 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Display: Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Display: Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Hardware: Operating System | Android 15 | Android 14, One UI 6.1 |
| Hardware: Chipset | Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 or the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (unconfirmed) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| Hardware: CPU | Octa-core | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Hardware: GPU | Adreno | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| Battery: Type | — | Li-Ion 5000 mAh, non-removable |
| Battery: Charging | — | 25W wired |
| Design: Type | Bar | Bar |
| Design: Dimensions | 162.6 x 77.9 x 7.4 mm (6.40 x 3.07 x 0.29 in) | 161.7 x 78 x 8.2 mm (6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 in) |
| Design: Weight | - | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Design: Colors | Blue; other colors | Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon |
Colors make differences within the same measurement easy to see. They do not label a phone safe or unsafe. US values use 1 g of tissue and the 1.6 W/kg limit; EU values use 10 g and 2 W/kg, so don't mix them. What SAR tells you.
Questions and answers
Which has lower head SAR, the Samsung Galaxy A36 or the Samsung Galaxy A35?
The Samsung Galaxy A36 lists the lower head sar, cellular only (us): 0.70 W/kg vs 0.80 W/kg for the Samsung Galaxy A35 (13% lower). Values are reported maximums from FCC filings as listed in the RF Safe dataset, in W/kg averaged over 1 gram of tissue.
Which has lower body SAR, the Samsung Galaxy A36 or the Samsung Galaxy A35?
The Samsung Galaxy A35 lists the lower body sar, cellular only (us): 0.76 W/kg vs 1.24 W/kg for the Samsung Galaxy A36 (39% lower). Values are reported maximums from FCC filings as listed in the RF Safe dataset, in W/kg averaged over 1 gram of tissue.
Which has lower hotspot SAR (Wi-Fi + cellular), the Samsung Galaxy A36 or the Samsung Galaxy A35?
Both list the same hotspot sar, wi-fi + cellular (us): 1.59 W/kg. Values are reported maximums from FCC filings as listed in the RF Safe dataset, in W/kg averaged over 1 gram of tissue.
What is the highest reported SAR value for each phone?
Across the six US measurements, the Samsung Galaxy A36's highest listed value is 1.59 W/kg and the Samsung Galaxy A35's is 1.59 W/kg. The FCC limit for the head and body is 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 gram. Wi-Fi + cellular values are simultaneous-transmission sums and are evaluated differently, so read each row on its own.
Does a lower SAR mean a phone is safer?
No. SAR is a lab compliance measurement taken at maximum power. Everyday exposure depends on signal strength, distance from the body and which radios are active. Use SAR to compare phones, not as a health score.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the RF Safe SAR dataset, compiled from FCC equipment authorization filings (FCC ID A3LSMA366U and A3LSMA356U). Nothing on this page is estimated.