Samsung Galaxy A35 vs Samsung Galaxy A34: SAR comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A34 lists the lower head sar, cellular only (us): 0.75 W/kg vs 0.80 W/kg for the Samsung Galaxy A35 (6% lower). Reported SAR values in W/kg; lower is shaded green and higher red within each row, for comparison only.
Side-by-side SAR values
| Measurement | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Samsung Galaxy A34 |
|---|---|---|
| Head SAR, cellular only (US) | 0.80 W/kg | 0.75 W/kg |
| Body SAR, cellular only (US) | 0.76 W/kg | 0.76 W/kg |
| Head SAR, Wi-Fi + cellular (US) | 1.42 W/kg | 1.57 W/kg |
| Body SAR, Wi-Fi + cellular (US) | 1.16 W/kg | 1.31 W/kg |
| Hotspot SAR, cellular only (US) | 0.97 W/kg | 1.23 W/kg |
| Hotspot SAR, Wi-Fi + cellular (US) | 1.59 W/kg | 1.57 W/kg |
| Display: Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz |
| Display: Size | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Display: Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Display: Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Hardware: Operating System | Android 14, One UI 6.1 | Android 13, One UI 5.1 |
| Hardware: Chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) | Mediatek MT6877V Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| Hardware: CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Hardware: GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| Battery: Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable |
| Battery: Charging | 25W wired | 25W wired |
| Design: Type | Bar | Bar |
| Design: Dimensions | 161.7 x 78 x 8.2 mm (6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 in) | 161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2 mm (6.35 x 3.07 x 0.32 in) |
| Design: Weight | 209 g (7.37 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Design: Colors | Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon | Lime, Graphite, Violet, Silver |
Colors make differences within the same measurement easy to see. They do not label a phone safe or unsafe. US values use 1 g of tissue and the 1.6 W/kg limit; EU values use 10 g and 2 W/kg, so don't mix them. What SAR tells you.
Questions and answers
Which has lower head SAR, the Samsung Galaxy A35 or the Samsung Galaxy A34?
The Samsung Galaxy A34 lists the lower head sar, cellular only (us): 0.75 W/kg vs 0.80 W/kg for the Samsung Galaxy A35 (6% lower). Values are reported maximums from FCC filings as listed in the RF Safe dataset, in W/kg averaged over 1 gram of tissue.
Which has lower body SAR, the Samsung Galaxy A35 or the Samsung Galaxy A34?
Both list the same body sar, cellular only (us): 0.76 W/kg. Values are reported maximums from FCC filings as listed in the RF Safe dataset, in W/kg averaged over 1 gram of tissue.
Which has lower hotspot SAR (Wi-Fi + cellular), the Samsung Galaxy A35 or the Samsung Galaxy A34?
The Samsung Galaxy A34 lists the lower hotspot sar, wi-fi + cellular (us): 1.57 W/kg vs 1.59 W/kg for the Samsung Galaxy A35 (1% lower). Values are reported maximums from FCC filings as listed in the RF Safe dataset, in W/kg averaged over 1 gram of tissue.
What is the highest reported SAR value for each phone?
Across the six US measurements, the Samsung Galaxy A35's highest listed value is 1.59 W/kg and the Samsung Galaxy A34's is 1.57 W/kg. The FCC limit for the head and body is 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 gram. Wi-Fi + cellular values are simultaneous-transmission sums and are evaluated differently, so read each row on its own.
Does a lower SAR mean a phone is safer?
No. SAR is a lab compliance measurement taken at maximum power. Everyday exposure depends on signal strength, distance from the body and which radios are active. Use SAR to compare phones, not as a health score.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the RF Safe SAR dataset, compiled from FCC equipment authorization filings (FCC ID A3LSMA356U and A3LSMA346M). Nothing on this page is estimated.