Apple iPhone 16 Pro vs Google Pixel 9: SAR comparison
The Google Pixel 9 lists the lower head sar, cellular only (us): 0.87 W/kg vs 1.09 W/kg for the Apple iPhone 16 Pro (20% lower). Reported SAR values in W/kg; lower is shaded green and higher red within each row, for comparison only.
Side-by-side SAR values
| Measurement | Apple iPhone 16 Pro | Google Pixel 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Head SAR, cellular only (US) | 1.09 W/kg | 0.87 W/kg |
| Body SAR, cellular only (US) | 1.19 W/kg | 0.99 W/kg |
| Head SAR, Wi-Fi + cellular (US) | 1.51 W/kg | 1.59 W/kg |
| Body SAR, Wi-Fi + cellular (US) | 1.58 W/kg | 1.59 W/kg |
| Hotspot SAR, cellular only (US) | 1.58 W/kg | 0.85 W/kg |
| Hotspot SAR, Wi-Fi + cellular (US) | 1.58 W/kg | 1.59 W/kg |
| Display: Type | LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED, 120Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 1000 nits (typ), 2000 nits (HBM) | OLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1800 nits (HBM), 2700 nits (peak) |
| Display: Size | 6.3 inches, 96.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 94.7 cm2 (~86.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Display: Resolution | 1206 x 2622 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) | 1080 x 2424 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~422 ppi density) |
| Display: Protection | Ceramic Shield glass (2024 gen) | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Hardware: Operating System | iOS 18 | Android 14, up to 7 major Android upgrades |
| Hardware: Chipset | Apple A18 Pro (3 nm) | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) |
| Hardware: CPU | Hexa-core | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.92 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Hardware: GPU | Apple GPU (6-core graphics) | Mali-G715 MC7 |
| Battery: Type | Li-Ion, non-removable | Li-Ion 4700 mAh, non-removable |
| Battery: Charging | Wired, PD2.0, 50% in 30 min (advertised) 25W wireless (MagSafe), 15W wireless (China only) 15W wireless (Qi2) 4.5W reverse wired | 27W wired, PD3.0, PPS, 55% in 30 min (advertised) 15W wireless (w/ Pixel Stand) 12W wireless (w/ Qi compatible charger) Reverse wireless |
| Design: Type | Bar | Bar |
| Design: Dimensions | 149.6 x 71.5 x 8.3 mm (5.89 x 2.81 x 0.33 in) | 152.8 x 72 x 8.5 mm (6.02 x 2.83 x 0.33 in) |
| Design: Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 198 g (6.98 oz) |
| Design: Colors | Black Titanium, White Titanium, Natural Titanium, Desert Titanium | Obsidian, Porcelain, Wintergreen, Peony |
Colors make differences within the same measurement easy to see. They do not label a phone safe or unsafe. US values use 1 g of tissue and the 1.6 W/kg limit; EU values use 10 g and 2 W/kg, so don't mix them. What SAR tells you.
Questions and answers
Which has lower head SAR, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro or the Google Pixel 9?
The Google Pixel 9 lists the lower head sar, cellular only (us): 0.87 W/kg vs 1.09 W/kg for the Apple iPhone 16 Pro (20% lower). Values are reported maximums from FCC filings as listed in the RF Safe dataset, in W/kg averaged over 1 gram of tissue.
Which has lower body SAR, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro or the Google Pixel 9?
The Google Pixel 9 lists the lower body sar, cellular only (us): 0.99 W/kg vs 1.19 W/kg for the Apple iPhone 16 Pro (17% lower). Values are reported maximums from FCC filings as listed in the RF Safe dataset, in W/kg averaged over 1 gram of tissue.
Which has lower hotspot SAR (Wi-Fi + cellular), the Apple iPhone 16 Pro or the Google Pixel 9?
The Apple iPhone 16 Pro lists the lower hotspot sar, wi-fi + cellular (us): 1.58 W/kg vs 1.59 W/kg for the Google Pixel 9 (1% lower). Values are reported maximums from FCC filings as listed in the RF Safe dataset, in W/kg averaged over 1 gram of tissue.
What is the highest reported SAR value for each phone?
Across the six US measurements, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro's highest listed value is 1.58 W/kg and the Google Pixel 9's is 1.59 W/kg. The FCC limit for the head and body is 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 gram. Wi-Fi + cellular values are simultaneous-transmission sums and are evaluated differently, so read each row on its own.
Does a lower SAR mean a phone is safer?
No. SAR is a lab compliance measurement taken at maximum power. Everyday exposure depends on signal strength, distance from the body and which radios are active. Use SAR to compare phones, not as a health score.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the RF Safe SAR dataset, compiled from FCC equipment authorization filings (FCC ID BCG-E8666A and A4RGUR25). Nothing on this page is estimated.
More comparisons
- Apple iPhone 16 Pro vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro
- Apple iPhone 16 Pro vs Apple iPhone 15 Pro
- Apple iPhone 16 Pro vs Apple iPhone 14 Pro
- Apple iPhone 16 Pro vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
- Apple iPhone 16 Pro vs Apple iPhone 16
- Apple iPhone 16 Pro vs Apple iPhone 16 Plus
- Google Pixel 9 vs Google Pixel 8
- Google Pixel 9 vs Google Pixel 5
- Google Pixel 9 vs Google Pixel 9 Pro
- Google Pixel 9 vs Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
- Google Pixel 9 vs Google Pixel 9 Pro Xl
- Google Pixel 9 vs Apple iPhone 17