Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy S26 5g: SAR comparison

The Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max lists the lower head sar, cellular only (us): 1.01 W/kg vs 1.19 W/kg for the Samsung Galaxy S26 5g (15% lower). Reported SAR values in W/kg; lower is shaded green and higher red within each row, for comparison only.

Side-by-side SAR values

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy S26 5g reported SAR and specs
MeasurementApple iPhone 16 Pro MaxSamsung Galaxy S26 5g
Head SAR, cellular only (US)1.01 W/kg1.19 W/kg
Body SAR, cellular only (US)1.15 W/kg1.20 W/kg
Head SAR, Wi-Fi + cellular (US)1.41 W/kg1.58 W/kg
Body SAR, Wi-Fi + cellular (US)1.55 W/kg1.58 W/kg
Hotspot SAR, cellular only (US)1.15 W/kg1.19 W/kg
Hotspot SAR, Wi-Fi + cellular (US)1.55 W/kg1.58 W/kg
Display: TypeLTPO Super Retina XDR OLED, 120Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 1000 nits (typ), 2000 nits (HBM)Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 2600 nits (peak)
Display: Size6.9 inches, 115.6 cm2 (~91.4% screen-to-body ratio)6.3 inches, 96.5 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio)
Display: Resolution1320 x 2868 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~460 ppi density)1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~411 ppi density)
Display: ProtectionCeramic Shield glass (2024 gen)Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2, Mohs level 5
Hardware: Operating SystemiOS 18Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8.5
Hardware: ChipsetApple A18 Pro (3 nm)Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm) - US/CNExynos 2600 (2 nm) - ROW
Hardware: CPUHexa-core (2x4.04 GHz + 4x2.X GHz)Octa-core (2x4.74 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix L + 6x3.62 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix M) - US/CN10-core (1x3.80GHz C1-Ultra & 3x3.25GHz C1-Pro & 6x2.75GHz C1-Pro) - ROW
Hardware: GPUApple GPU (6-core graphics)Adreno 840 - US/CNXclipse 960 - ROW
Battery: TypeLi-Ion, non-removableLi-Ion 4300 mAh
Battery: ChargingWired, PD2.0, 50% in 30 min (advertised) 25W wireless (MagSafe), 15W wireless (China only) 15W wireless (Qi2) 4.5W reverse wired25W wired, PD3.0, 55% in 30 min 15W wireless (Qi2 Ready) 4.5W reverse wireless
Design: TypeBarBar
Design: Dimensions163 x 77.6 x 8.3 mm (6.42 x 3.06 x 0.33 in)149.6 x 71.7 x 7.2 mm (5.89 x 2.82 x 0.28 in)
Design: Weight227 g (8.01 oz)167 g (5.89 oz)
Design: ColorsBlack Titanium, White Titanium, Natural Titanium, Desert TitaniumCobalt Violet, Sky Blue, Black, White, Silver Shadow, Pink Gold

Colors make differences within the same measurement easy to see. They do not label a phone safe or unsafe. US values use 1 g of tissue and the 1.6 W/kg limit; EU values use 10 g and 2 W/kg, so don't mix them. What SAR tells you.

Questions and answers

Which has lower head SAR, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max or the Samsung Galaxy S26 5g?

The Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max lists the lower head sar, cellular only (us): 1.01 W/kg vs 1.19 W/kg for the Samsung Galaxy S26 5g (15% lower). Values are reported maximums from FCC filings as listed in the RF Safe dataset, in W/kg averaged over 1 gram of tissue.

Which has lower body SAR, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max or the Samsung Galaxy S26 5g?

The Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max lists the lower body sar, cellular only (us): 1.15 W/kg vs 1.20 W/kg for the Samsung Galaxy S26 5g (4% lower). Values are reported maximums from FCC filings as listed in the RF Safe dataset, in W/kg averaged over 1 gram of tissue.

Which has lower hotspot SAR (Wi-Fi + cellular), the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max or the Samsung Galaxy S26 5g?

The Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max lists the lower hotspot sar, wi-fi + cellular (us): 1.55 W/kg vs 1.58 W/kg for the Samsung Galaxy S26 5g (2% lower). Values are reported maximums from FCC filings as listed in the RF Safe dataset, in W/kg averaged over 1 gram of tissue.

What is the highest reported SAR value for each phone?

Across the six US measurements, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max's highest listed value is 1.55 W/kg and the Samsung Galaxy S26 5g's is 1.58 W/kg. The FCC limit for the head and body is 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 gram. Wi-Fi + cellular values are simultaneous-transmission sums and are evaluated differently, so read each row on its own.

Does a lower SAR mean a phone is safer?

No. SAR is a lab compliance measurement taken at maximum power. Everyday exposure depends on signal strength, distance from the body and which radios are active. Use SAR to compare phones, not as a health score.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the RF Safe SAR dataset, compiled from FCC equipment authorization filings (FCC ID BCG-E8684A and A3LSMS942U). Nothing on this page is estimated.

More comparisons

All phone-vs-phone pages · SAR rankings · Research library

Compare any two phones

Opens a ready-made comparison page when there is one, otherwise the interactive SAR Compare app.