Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Google Pixel 7a: SAR comparison
The Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max lists the lower head sar, cellular only (us): 1.01 W/kg vs 1.20 W/kg for the Google Pixel 7a (16% lower). Reported SAR values in W/kg; lower is shaded green and higher red within each row, for comparison only.
Side-by-side SAR values
| Measurement | Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | Google Pixel 7a |
|---|---|---|
| Head SAR, cellular only (US) | 1.01 W/kg | 1.20 W/kg |
| Body SAR, cellular only (US) | 1.15 W/kg | 0.95 W/kg |
| Head SAR, Wi-Fi + cellular (US) | 1.41 W/kg | 1.58 W/kg |
| Body SAR, Wi-Fi + cellular (US) | 1.55 W/kg | 1.58 W/kg |
| Hotspot SAR, cellular only (US) | 1.15 W/kg | 0.99 W/kg |
| Hotspot SAR, Wi-Fi + cellular (US) | 1.55 W/kg | 1.59 W/kg |
| Display: Type | LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED, 120Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 1000 nits (typ), 2000 nits (HBM) | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| Display: Size | 6.9 inches, 115.6 cm2 (~91.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 89.8 cm2 |
| Display: Resolution | 1320 x 2868 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~431 ppi density) |
| Display: Protection | Ceramic Shield glass (2024 gen) | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Hardware: Operating System | iOS 18 | Android 13 |
| Hardware: Chipset | Apple A18 Pro (3 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| Hardware: CPU | Hexa-core (2x4.04 GHz + 4x2.X GHz) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Hardware: GPU | Apple GPU (6-core graphics) | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| Battery: Type | Li-Ion, non-removable | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable |
| Battery: Charging | Wired, PD2.0, 50% in 30 min (advertised) 25W wireless (MagSafe), 15W wireless (China only) 15W wireless (Qi2) 4.5W reverse wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 |
| Design: Type | Bar | Bar |
| Design: Dimensions | 163 x 77.6 x 8.3 mm (6.42 x 3.06 x 0.33 in) | - |
| Design: Weight | 227 g (8.01 oz) | - |
| Design: Colors | Black Titanium, White Titanium, Natural Titanium, Desert Titanium | Arctic Blue, Carbon, Cotton |
Colors make differences within the same measurement easy to see. They do not label a phone safe or unsafe. US values use 1 g of tissue and the 1.6 W/kg limit; EU values use 10 g and 2 W/kg, so don't mix them. What SAR tells you.
Questions and answers
Which has lower head SAR, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max or the Google Pixel 7a?
The Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max lists the lower head sar, cellular only (us): 1.01 W/kg vs 1.20 W/kg for the Google Pixel 7a (16% lower). Values are reported maximums from FCC filings as listed in the RF Safe dataset, in W/kg averaged over 1 gram of tissue.
Which has lower body SAR, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max or the Google Pixel 7a?
The Google Pixel 7a lists the lower body sar, cellular only (us): 0.95 W/kg vs 1.15 W/kg for the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (17% lower). Values are reported maximums from FCC filings as listed in the RF Safe dataset, in W/kg averaged over 1 gram of tissue.
Which has lower hotspot SAR (Wi-Fi + cellular), the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max or the Google Pixel 7a?
The Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max lists the lower hotspot sar, wi-fi + cellular (us): 1.55 W/kg vs 1.59 W/kg for the Google Pixel 7a (3% lower). Values are reported maximums from FCC filings as listed in the RF Safe dataset, in W/kg averaged over 1 gram of tissue.
What is the highest reported SAR value for each phone?
Across the six US measurements, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max's highest listed value is 1.55 W/kg and the Google Pixel 7a's is 1.59 W/kg. The FCC limit for the head and body is 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 gram. Wi-Fi + cellular values are simultaneous-transmission sums and are evaluated differently, so read each row on its own.
Does a lower SAR mean a phone is safer?
No. SAR is a lab compliance measurement taken at maximum power. Everyday exposure depends on signal strength, distance from the body and which radios are active. Use SAR to compare phones, not as a health score.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the RF Safe SAR dataset, compiled from FCC equipment authorization filings (FCC ID BCG-E8684A and A4RGHL1X). Nothing on this page is estimated.
More comparisons
- Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
- Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max
- Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
- Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro
- Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Apple iPhone 16
- Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Apple iPhone 16 Plus
- Google Pixel 7a vs Google Pixel 8a
- Google Pixel 7a vs Google Pixel 6A
- Google Pixel 7a vs Google Pixel 5A 5G
- Google Pixel 7a vs Google Pixel 7 PRO
- Google Pixel 7a vs Samsung Galaxy A55
- Google Pixel 7a vs Samsung Galaxy S24 Fe