Apple iPhone 11 vs Samsung Galaxy S9: SAR comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S9 lists the lower head sar, cellular only (us): 0.35 W/kg vs 1.14 W/kg for the Apple iPhone 11 (69% lower). Reported SAR values in W/kg; lower is shaded green and higher red within each row, for comparison only.
Side-by-side SAR values
| Measurement | Apple iPhone 11 | Samsung Galaxy S9 |
|---|---|---|
| Head SAR, cellular only (US) | 1.14 W/kg | 0.35 W/kg |
| Body SAR, cellular only (US) | 1.14 W/kg | 0.96 W/kg |
| Head SAR, Wi-Fi + cellular (US) | 1.41 W/kg | 1.25 W/kg |
| Body SAR, Wi-Fi + cellular (US) | 1.52 W/kg | 1.59 W/kg |
| Hotspot SAR, cellular only (US) | 1.17 W/kg | n/a |
| Hotspot SAR, Wi-Fi + cellular (US) | 1.52 W/kg | 0.95 W/kg |
| Head SAR (EU, 10 g) | n/a | 0.32 W/kg |
| Body SAR (EU, 10 g) | n/a | 1.27 W/kg |
| Display: Type | Liquid Retina IPS LCD capacitive touchscreen, 16M colors | Super AMOLED, HDR10 |
| Display: Size | 6.1 inches, 90.3 cm2 (~79.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.2 inches, 98.3 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Display: Resolution | 828 x 1792 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~326 ppi density) | 1440 x 2960 pixels, 18.5:9 ratio (~529 ppi density) |
| Display: Protection | Scratch-resistant glass, oleophobic coating | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Hardware: Operating System | iOS 13 | Android 8.0 (Oreo), upgradable to Android 10, One UI 2.5 |
| Hardware: Chipset | Apple A13 Bionic (7 nm+) | Exynos 9810 (10 nm) - EMEAQualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm) - USA/LATAM, China |
| Hardware: CPU | N/A | Octa-core (4x2.7 GHz Mongoose M3 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - EMEAOcta-core (4x2.8 GHz Kryo 385 Gold & 4x1.7 GHz Kryo 385 Silver) - USA/LATAM, China |
| Hardware: GPU | N/A | Mali-G72 MP18 - EMEAAdreno 630 - USA/LATAM, China |
| Battery: Charging | Fast battery charging 18W: 50% in 30 min USB Power Delivery 2.0 Qi wireless charging | 15W wired, QC2 Wireless (Qi/PMA) (market dependent) |
| Battery: Type | — | Li-Ion 3500 mAh, non-removable (13.48 Wh) |
| Battery: Battery Test | — | Endurance rating 86h |
| Design: Type | Bar | Bar |
| Design: Dimensions | 150.9 x 75.7 x 8.3 mm (5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 158.1 x 73.8 x 8.5 mm (6.22 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) |
| Design: Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Design: Colors | Black, Green, Yellow, Purple, Red, White | Midnight Black, Coral Blue, Titanium Gray, Lilac Purple, Burgundy Red, Sunrise Gold, Ice Blue, Polaris Blue |
Colors make differences within the same measurement easy to see. They do not label a phone safe or unsafe. US values use 1 g of tissue and the 1.6 W/kg limit; EU values use 10 g and 2 W/kg, so don't mix them. What SAR tells you.
Questions and answers
Which has lower head SAR, the Apple iPhone 11 or the Samsung Galaxy S9?
The Samsung Galaxy S9 lists the lower head sar, cellular only (us): 0.35 W/kg vs 1.14 W/kg for the Apple iPhone 11 (69% lower). Values are reported maximums from FCC filings as listed in the RF Safe dataset, in W/kg averaged over 1 gram of tissue.
Which has lower body SAR, the Apple iPhone 11 or the Samsung Galaxy S9?
The Samsung Galaxy S9 lists the lower body sar, cellular only (us): 0.96 W/kg vs 1.14 W/kg for the Apple iPhone 11 (16% lower). Values are reported maximums from FCC filings as listed in the RF Safe dataset, in W/kg averaged over 1 gram of tissue.
Which has lower hotspot SAR (Wi-Fi + cellular), the Apple iPhone 11 or the Samsung Galaxy S9?
The Samsung Galaxy S9 lists the lower hotspot sar, wi-fi + cellular (us): 0.95 W/kg vs 1.52 W/kg for the Apple iPhone 11 (38% lower). Values are reported maximums from FCC filings as listed in the RF Safe dataset, in W/kg averaged over 1 gram of tissue.
What is the highest reported SAR value for each phone?
Across the six US measurements, the Apple iPhone 11's highest listed value is 1.52 W/kg and the Samsung Galaxy S9's is 1.59 W/kg. The FCC limit for the head and body is 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 gram. Wi-Fi + cellular values are simultaneous-transmission sums and are evaluated differently, so read each row on its own.
Does a lower SAR mean a phone is safer?
No. SAR is a lab compliance measurement taken at maximum power. Everyday exposure depends on signal strength, distance from the body and which radios are active. Use SAR to compare phones, not as a health score.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the RF Safe SAR dataset, compiled from FCC equipment authorization filings (FCC ID BCG-E3309A and A3LSMG960U). Nothing on this page is estimated.
More comparisons
- Apple iPhone 11 vs Apple iPhone 13
- Apple iPhone 11 vs Apple iPhone 12
- Apple iPhone 11 vs Apple iPhone 8
- Apple iPhone 11 vs Apple iPhone 7
- Apple iPhone 11 vs Apple iPhone 11 Pro
- Apple iPhone 11 vs Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
- Samsung Galaxy S9 vs Samsung Galaxy S20
- Samsung Galaxy S9 vs Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
- Samsung Galaxy S9 vs Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus
- Samsung Galaxy S9 vs Google Pixel 2