Magnetic control of the brightness of fluorescent proteins
← Research streamThe report states that modest magnetic fields (~10 mT) altered the brightness of GFP-like fluorescent proteins when an appropriate cofactor was present, with a weak response around ΔF/F≈1%. It also reports weak magnetoresponse in a LOV-domain protein and an u…
Study snapshot
Abstract
We've discovered a simple, nontoxic, biocompatible way to control the brightness of GFP-like fluorescent proteins via modest magnetic fields (~10 mT). Fluorescent proteins which seem magnetically inert (e.g. EGFP, mScarlet) become magnetoresponsive in the presence of an appropriate cofactor (e.g. EGFP-FlavinTag, or an mScarlet/FMN solution). This method works at room-temperature and body-temperature, in vitro, in E. coli and in cultured mammalian cells. The GFP-family magnetoresponse is weak (ΔF/F≈1%), but shows the hallmarks of evolvability. This suggests exciting technological possibilities, both short-term (e.g. lock-in detection, multiplexing) and long-term (e.g. optically-detected MRI, magnetogenetics). We've also discovered weak magnetoresponse from a member of the LOV-domain family. This suggests the possibility that magnetoresponse is a general feature of fluorescent proteins, and not unique to the cryptochrome/photolyase family. UPDATE: We've increased the magnetoresponse of AsLOV2 via directed evolution, yielding a protein (MagLOV) with a remarkably large ΔF/F≈75%. We consider MagLOV to be the most promising candidate ancestor for magnetogenetic tools.
AI evidence extraction
Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.
Main findings
The report states that modest magnetic fields (~10 mT) altered the brightness of GFP-like fluorescent proteins when an appropriate cofactor was present, with a weak response around ΔF/F≈1%. It also reports weak magnetoresponse in a LOV-domain protein and an updated directed-evolution result for AsLOV2 (MagLOV) with a larger reported response of ΔF/F≈75%.
Outcomes measured
- Fluorescent protein brightness (magnetoresponse, ΔF/F)
- Magnetic-field-dependent fluorescence changes in GFP-like proteins and LOV-domain proteins
Limitations
- Hosted on Zenodo rather than a journal article in the provided metadata
- No sample size reported in the abstract
- No detailed methods, controls, or statistical results reported in the abstract
- Findings span multiple systems (in vitro, E. coli, cultured mammalian cells) without quantitative breakdown in the abstract
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "in_vitro",
"exposure": {
"band": "other",
"source": "other",
"frequency_mhz": null,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": null
},
"population": "Fluorescent proteins studied in vitro, in E. coli, and in cultured mammalian cells",
"sample_size": null,
"outcomes": [
"Fluorescent protein brightness (magnetoresponse, ΔF/F)",
"Magnetic-field-dependent fluorescence changes in GFP-like proteins and LOV-domain proteins"
],
"main_findings": "The report states that modest magnetic fields (~10 mT) altered the brightness of GFP-like fluorescent proteins when an appropriate cofactor was present, with a weak response around ΔF/F≈1%. It also reports weak magnetoresponse in a LOV-domain protein and an updated directed-evolution result for AsLOV2 (MagLOV) with a larger reported response of ΔF/F≈75%.",
"effect_direction": "mixed",
"limitations": [
"Hosted on Zenodo rather than a journal article in the provided metadata",
"No sample size reported in the abstract",
"No detailed methods, controls, or statistical results reported in the abstract",
"Findings span multiple systems (in vitro, E. coli, cultured mammalian cells) without quantitative breakdown in the abstract"
],
"evidence_strength": "very_low",
"confidence": 0.76,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "no",
"keywords": [
"magnetic fields",
"fluorescent proteins",
"GFP",
"EGFP",
"mScarlet",
"FlavinTag",
"FMN",
"LOV domain",
"AsLOV2",
"MagLOV",
"magnetoresponse",
"in vitro",
"E. coli",
"cultured mammalian cells"
],
"suggested_hubs": []
}AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.
Identifiers and source
DOI: Not supplied
PubMed: Not supplied
Related papers
- Extremely low frequency magnetic fields (ELF-MF) in Switzerland: From exposure monitoring to daily 2024
- Exploring the potential link between prostate cancer and magnetic fields 2024
- Neurobiological effects and mechanisms of magnetic fields: a review from 2000 to 2023 2024
- Cellular and Molecular Effects of Magnetic Fields 2024
- Magnetic fields from indoor transformer stations and risk of cancer in adults: a cohort study 2024
- Health risks for medical personnel due to magnetic fields in magnetic resonance imaging 2024