The effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation on sperm function

Reproduction · 2016 · Harm · Low evidence

← Research stream

HarmLow evidencePaper 6832

Study snapshot

PublicationReproduction · 2016

Study typereview

Reported directionHarm

Evidence ratingLow

Abstract

Mobile phone usage has become an integral part of our lives. However, the effects of the radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation (RF-EMR) emitted by these devices on biological systems and specifically the reproductive systems are currently under active debate. A fundamental hindrance to the current debate is that there is no clear mechanism of how such non-ionising radiation influences biological systems. Therefore, we explored the documented impacts of RF-EMR on the male reproductive system and considered any common observations that could provide insights on a potential mechanism. Among a total of 27 studies investigating the effects of RF-EMR on the male reproductive system, negative consequences of exposure were reported in 21. Within these 21 studies, 11 of the 15 that investigated sperm motility reported significant declines, 7 of 7 that measured the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) documented elevated levels and 4 of 5 studies that probed for DNA damage highlighted increased damage due to RF-EMR exposure. Associated with this, RF-EMR treatment reduced the antioxidant levels in 6 of 6 studies that discussed this phenomenon, whereas consequences of RF-EMR were successfully ameliorated with the supplementation of antioxidants in all 3 studies that carried out these experiments. In light of this, we envisage a two-step mechanism whereby RF-EMR is able to induce mitochondrial dysfunction leading to elevated ROS production. A continued focus on research, which aims to shed light on the biological effects of RF-EMR will allow us to test and assess this proposed mechanism in a variety of cell types.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typereview

Effect directionharm

Populationmale reproductive system; sperm

Sample size27

ExposureRF

Evidence strengthLowConfidence: 94% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

This review summarized 27 studies on RF-EMR and the male reproductive system, reporting negative consequences in 21 studies. Among the included studies, most reported reduced sperm motility, all studies measuring ROS reported increases, most studies assessing DNA damage reported increases, and all studies discussing antioxidant levels reported reductions; antioxidant supplementation ameliorated effects in 3 studies.

Outcomes measured

sperm motility
reactive oxygen species (ROS) production
DNA damage
antioxidant levels
male reproductive system effects

Limitations

Review article rather than a primary study
Findings are summarized across studies with varying endpoints
Mechanistic proposal is discussed but not directly established in the abstract

View raw extracted JSON

{
  "study_type": "review",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "RF",
    "source": "mobile phone",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": "male reproductive system; sperm",
  "sample_size": 27,
  "outcomes": [
    "sperm motility",
    "reactive oxygen species (ROS) production",
    "DNA damage",
    "antioxidant levels",
    "male reproductive system effects"
  ],
  "main_findings": "This review summarized 27 studies on RF-EMR and the male reproductive system, reporting negative consequences in 21 studies. Among the included studies, most reported reduced sperm motility, all studies measuring ROS reported increases, most studies assessing DNA damage reported increases, and all studies discussing antioxidant levels reported reductions; antioxidant supplementation ameliorated effects in 3 studies.",
  "effect_direction": "harm",
  "limitations": [
    "Review article rather than a primary study",
    "Findings are summarized across studies with varying endpoints",
    "Mechanistic proposal is discussed but not directly established in the abstract"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "low",
  "confidence": 0.94,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "RF-EMR",
    "radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation",
    "mobile phone",
    "sperm",
    "male reproductive system",
    "sperm motility",
    "reactive oxygen species",
    "ROS",
    "DNA damage",
    "antioxidants",
    "mitochondrial dysfunction",
    "review"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": []
}

AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1530/rep-16-0126
PubMed: 27601711

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library