Effect of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation Emitted by Modern Cellphones on Sperm Motility and Viability: An In Vitro Study

Eur Urol Focus · 2023 · Mixed · Low evidence

← Research stream

MixedLow evidencePaper 529

In this in vitro study, semen samples exposed to smartphone RF-EMR during WhatsApp voice calls showed decreased sperm motility and viability with WiFi exposure, but not with 4G or 5G exposure. The study was described as exploratory, and the authors noted larg…

Study snapshot

PublicationEur Urol Focus · 2023

Study typein_vitro

Reported directionMixed

Evidence ratingLow

Abstract

Effect of Radiofrequency Radiation Emitted by Modern Cellphones on Sperm Motility and Viability: An In Vitro Study Chu KY, Khodamoradi K, Blachman-Braun R, Dullea A, Bidhan J, Campbell K, Zizzo J, Israeli J, Kim M, Petrella F, Ibrahim E, Ramasamy R. Effect of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation Emitted by Modern Cellphones on Sperm Motility and Viability: An In Vitro Study. Eur Urol Focus. 2023 Jan;9(1):69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.11.004. Abstract Background: Cellphones emit radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation (RF-EMR) for transmission of data for social media communication, web browsing, and music/podcast streaming. Use of Bluetooth earbuds has probably prolonged the time during which cellphones reside in the trouser pockets of men. It has been postulated that RF-EMR increases oxidative stress and induces free radical formation. Objective: To investigate the effect of wireless-spectrum (4G, 5G, and WiFi) RF-EMR emitted by modern smartphones on sperm motility and viability and explore whether these effects can be mitigated using a physical barrier or distance. Design, setting, and participants: Semen samples were obtained from fertile normozoospermic men aged 25-35 yr. A current-generation smartphone in talk mode was used as the RF-EMR source. A WhatsApp voice call was made using either 4G, 5G, or WiFi wireless connectivity. We determined if exposure effects were mitigated by either a cellphone case or greater distance from the semen sample. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The semen samples were analyzed according to 2010 World Health Organization laboratory guidelines. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v.28. Results and limitations: We observed decreases in sperm motility and viability with WiFi exposure but not with exposure to 4G or 5G RF-EMR. With large variability among smartphones, continued research on exposure effects is needed. Conclusions: Our exploratory study revealed that sperm motility and viability are negatively impacted by smartphones that use the WiFi spectrum for data transmission. Patient summary: We looked at the effect of cellphone use on sperm motility and viability. We found that cellphones using WiFi connectivity for data usage have harmful effects on semen quality in men. Excerpts Our study is not without limitations. First, our small sample size of 18 introduces potential sources of bias. We did not collect demographic data for these patients in order to maintain privacy, so the results may be subject to confounding bias. As the first of its kind at our institution, this small trial was a pilot study to validate our experimental model and procedures. We hope that further studies on the effects of RF-EMR on semen parameters can be performed on larger samples to validate our initial results. Second, we recognize that other potential variables, including temperature and radiation strength, could play a role in inducing changes in semen parameters. For this preliminary study, we were only interested in a single variable (radiation); future work should investigate the impact of temperature and radiation strength on changes in semen. This was an exploratory in vitro study, and further in vivo studies in animal models should be performed to further evaluate the impact of radiation on semen parameters. Conclusions Our study revealed that 4G/5G RF-EMR emitted by a contemporary cellphone did not have negative effects on sperm motility and viability. By contrast, WiFi exposure did have negative effects. During data use, there may be an increase in heat dissipated by a cellphone, depending on the power required to connect to the source. Interestingly, we observed varying effects of WiFi on sperm parameters, depending on the environment. We posit that a greater distance from the wireless router results in a need for more cellphone power, which may lead to greater heat production and result in negative effects on sperm motility and viability. Mitigation measures such as use of a cellphone case and increasing the distance between the cellphone and the sperm sample lessened the effects. Further studies need to be performed to better understand the effects of RF-EMR on sperm parameters. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typein_vitro

Effect directionmixed

PopulationSemen samples from fertile normozoospermic men aged 25-35 years

Sample sizeNot supplied

ExposureRF

Evidence strengthLowConfidence: 95% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

Outcomes measured

sperm motility
sperm viability
semen quality

Limitations

In vitro study
Exploratory study
Large variability among smartphones
Sample size not stated in the abstract

View raw extracted JSON

{
  "study_type": "in_vitro",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "RF",
    "source": "mobile phone",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": "Semen samples from fertile normozoospermic men aged 25-35 years",
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "sperm motility",
    "sperm viability",
    "semen quality"
  ],
  "main_findings": "In this in vitro study, semen samples exposed to smartphone RF-EMR during WhatsApp voice calls showed decreased sperm motility and viability with WiFi exposure, but not with 4G or 5G exposure. The study was described as exploratory, and the authors noted large variability among smartphones.",
  "effect_direction": "mixed",
  "limitations": [
    "In vitro study",
    "Exploratory study",
    "Large variability among smartphones",
    "Sample size not stated in the abstract"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "low",
  "confidence": 0.95,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "RF-EMR",
    "radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation",
    "mobile phone",
    "smartphone",
    "WiFi",
    "4G",
    "5G",
    "sperm motility",
    "sperm viability",
    "male fertility",
    "semen"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": []
}

AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.11.004
PubMed: 36379868

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library