Mobile phone mast effects on common frog (Rana temporaria) tadpoles: the city turned into a laboratory.
← Research streamEggs/tadpoles exposed at 140 m from several mobile phone antennae (measured electric field intensity 1.8–3.5 V/m) showed low coordination of movements, asynchronous growth, and 90% mortality (n=70). Controls kept under the same conditions but inside a Faraday…
Study snapshot
Abstract
An experiment has been made exposing eggs and tadpoles of the common frog (Rana temporaria) to electromagnetic radiation from several mobile (cell) phone antennae located at a distance of 140 meters. The experiment lasted two months, from the egg phase until an advanced phase of tadpole prior to metamorphosis. Measurements of electric field intensity (radiofrequencies and microwaves) in V/m obtained with three different devices were 1.8 to 3.5 V/m. In the exposed group (n = 70), low coordination of movements, an asynchronous growth, resulting in both big and small tadpoles, and a high mortality (90%) was observed. Regarding the control group (n = 70) under the same conditions but inside a Faraday cage, the coordination of movements was normal, the development was synchronous, and a mortality of 4.2% was obtained. These results indicate that radiation emitted by phone masts in a real situation may affect the development and may cause an increase in mortality of exposed tadpoles. This research may have huge implications for the natural world, which is now exposed to high microwave radiation levels from a multitude of phone masts.
AI evidence extraction
Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.
Main findings
Eggs/tadpoles exposed at 140 m from several mobile phone antennae (measured electric field intensity 1.8–3.5 V/m) showed low coordination of movements, asynchronous growth, and 90% mortality (n=70). Controls kept under the same conditions but inside a Faraday cage had normal coordination, synchronous development, and 4.2% mortality (n=70).
Outcomes measured
- movement coordination
- growth/development synchrony
- mortality
Limitations
- Frequency and other RF exposure parameters (e.g., modulation, power density) not reported in the abstract
- Exposure metric reported as electric field intensity (V/m) only; SAR not reported
- Details on randomization/blinding and other husbandry/environmental controls not described in the abstract
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "animal",
"exposure": {
"band": null,
"source": "mobile phone mast/base station antennae",
"frequency_mhz": null,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": "2 months (from egg phase to advanced tadpole phase prior to metamorphosis)"
},
"population": "Common frog (Rana temporaria) eggs and tadpoles",
"sample_size": 140,
"outcomes": [
"movement coordination",
"growth/development synchrony",
"mortality"
],
"main_findings": "Eggs/tadpoles exposed at 140 m from several mobile phone antennae (measured electric field intensity 1.8–3.5 V/m) showed low coordination of movements, asynchronous growth, and 90% mortality (n=70). Controls kept under the same conditions but inside a Faraday cage had normal coordination, synchronous development, and 4.2% mortality (n=70).",
"effect_direction": "harm",
"limitations": [
"Frequency and other RF exposure parameters (e.g., modulation, power density) not reported in the abstract",
"Exposure metric reported as electric field intensity (V/m) only; SAR not reported",
"Details on randomization/blinding and other husbandry/environmental controls not described in the abstract"
],
"evidence_strength": "low",
"confidence": 0.78,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"Rana temporaria",
"tadpoles",
"mobile phone mast",
"base station",
"radiofrequency",
"microwaves",
"electric field intensity",
"Faraday cage",
"mortality",
"development"
],
"suggested_hubs": [
{
"slug": "base-stations",
"weight": 0.9,
"reason": "Exposure source is radiation from several mobile phone antennae/masts measured in V/m at 140 m."
}
]
}AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.
Identifiers and source
DOI: 10.3109/15368371003685363
PubMed: 20560769
Related papers
- Electromagnetic field exposure monitoring of commercial 28-GHz band 5G base stations in Tokyo, 2024
- Whole-body SAR measurements of millimeter-wave base station in reverberation chambers 2024
- Human exposure to EMF from 5G base stations: analysis, evaluation and comparison of different 2024
- Absorption of 5G sub-6 GHz electromagnetic radiation from base station to male reproduction system 2024
- Estimation of SAR Average in Rats during 5G NR Chronic Exposure 2024
- A study on effects of cell phone tower-emitted non-ionizing radiations in an Allium cepa test system 2024