Some behavioral effects of short-term exposure of rats to 2.45 GHz microwave radiation.

Bioelectromagnetics · 1988 · Mixed · Low evidence

← Research stream

MixedLow evidencePaper 6244

Rats exposed to 2.45 GHz continuous-wave microwave radiation (10 mW/cm2 for 7 h) showed reduced locomotor activity and reduced responsiveness to repeated acoustic startle stimuli compared with sham-exposed animals. Microwave exposure had no effect on retentio…

Study snapshot

PublicationBioelectromagnetics · 1988

Study typeanimal

Reported directionMixed

Evidence ratingLow

Abstract

Rats were tested for neurobehavioral alterations immediately after exposure to 2.45-GHz (CW) microwave radiation at 10 mW/cm2 for 7 h. Behavioral tests used were locomotor activity, startle to an acoustic stimulus and acquisition and retention of a shock-motivated passive avoidance task. Both horizontal and vertical components of locomotor activity were assessed in 5-min epochs for a period of 30 min using photoelectric detectors. Microwave-exposed animals exhibited less activity than sham-exposed animals. This was most evident during the last 10-15 min of the 30-min test session. Twenty identical acoustical stimuli (8 KHz, 110 dB) were delivered to each rat at 40-s intervals. The microwave-exposed animals were less responsive to the stimuli than sham-exposed animals. Microwave exposure had no effect on the retention of a passive avoidance procedure when tested at 1 week after training. Both the locomotor activity and acoustic startle data demonstrate that, under the conditions of this experiment, microwave exposure may alter responsiveness of rats to novel environmental conditions or stimuli.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeanimal

Effect directionmixed

PopulationRats

Sample sizeNot supplied

Exposuremicrowave · 2450 MHz · 7 h

Evidence strengthLowConfidence: 74% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

Outcomes measured

locomotor activity
acoustic startle response
acquisition and retention of shock-motivated passive avoidance task

Limitations

Sample size not reported in abstract
Specifics of randomization/blinding not reported in abstract
SAR not reported; exposure characterized by power density only
Short-term exposure and immediate post-exposure testing; limited follow-up (passive avoidance retention at 1 week only)

View raw extracted JSON

{
  "study_type": "animal",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "microwave",
    "source": null,
    "frequency_mhz": 2450,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": "7 h"
  },
  "population": "Rats",
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "locomotor activity",
    "acoustic startle response",
    "acquisition and retention of shock-motivated passive avoidance task"
  ],
  "main_findings": "Rats exposed to 2.45 GHz continuous-wave microwave radiation (10 mW/cm2 for 7 h) showed reduced locomotor activity and reduced responsiveness to repeated acoustic startle stimuli compared with sham-exposed animals. Microwave exposure had no effect on retention of a passive avoidance procedure when tested 1 week after training.",
  "effect_direction": "mixed",
  "limitations": [
    "Sample size not reported in abstract",
    "Specifics of randomization/blinding not reported in abstract",
    "SAR not reported; exposure characterized by power density only",
    "Short-term exposure and immediate post-exposure testing; limited follow-up (passive avoidance retention at 1 week only)"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "low",
  "confidence": 0.74,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "rats",
    "2.45 GHz",
    "microwave radiation",
    "continuous wave",
    "10 mW/cm2",
    "locomotor activity",
    "acoustic startle",
    "passive avoidance",
    "behavior"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": []
}

AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1002/bem.2250090307
PubMed: 3178900

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library