Microwave radiation: an epidemiologic assessment.

Reviews on environmental health · 1979 · Unclear · Insufficient evidence

← Research stream

UnclearInsufficient evidencePaper 6082

Study snapshot

PublicationReviews on environmental health · 1979

Study typereview

Reported directionUnclear

Evidence ratingInsufficient

Abstract

Microwave radiation is coming into increasing use in many countries; it is in use in communications, in industry, for ovens in the home and in commercial establishments and for diathermy. The power output is increasing steadily and community exposure is already a fact. East European countries claim that adverse effects can result from exposure substantially lower than levels permitted in Western countries. Also some of the effects claimed are frequent and disabling. Prolonged and cumulative exposure is especially suspect. While studies in animals are necessary, studies in man cannot be dispensed with. Extrapolation from on species of animal to another, and even more, to man, is hazardous. Moreover, epidemiologic studies are needed to uncover the potentially wide variety of subtle effects, especially mental. Fortunately, there are indices of exposure which can be used in field studies and dosimetry is reaching the point where it can be applied to field studies.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typereview

Effect directionunclear

PopulationNot supplied

Sample sizeNot supplied

Exposuremicrowave · prolonged and cumulative exposure (discussed)

Evidence strengthInsufficientConfidence: 66% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

The article discusses increasing community exposure to microwave radiation and notes that East European countries report adverse effects at exposure levels lower than those permitted in Western countries. It emphasizes the need for epidemiologic studies in humans to detect potentially subtle effects and notes that exposure indices and dosimetry are becoming applicable to field studies.

Outcomes measured

adverse health effects (general)
subtle effects (especially mental)

Limitations

Narrative review/assessment; no specific study results, effect sizes, or quantitative exposure levels reported in the abstract
No specific population, design details, or outcomes measured are described

View raw extracted JSON

{
  "study_type": "review",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "microwave",
    "source": "communications, industry, microwave ovens, diathermy",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": "prolonged and cumulative exposure (discussed)"
  },
  "population": null,
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "adverse health effects (general)",
    "subtle effects (especially mental)"
  ],
  "main_findings": "The article discusses increasing community exposure to microwave radiation and notes that East European countries report adverse effects at exposure levels lower than those permitted in Western countries. It emphasizes the need for epidemiologic studies in humans to detect potentially subtle effects and notes that exposure indices and dosimetry are becoming applicable to field studies.",
  "effect_direction": "unclear",
  "limitations": [
    "Narrative review/assessment; no specific study results, effect sizes, or quantitative exposure levels reported in the abstract",
    "No specific population, design details, or outcomes measured are described"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "insufficient",
  "confidence": 0.66,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "microwave radiation",
    "epidemiology",
    "community exposure",
    "communications",
    "industrial exposure",
    "microwave ovens",
    "diathermy",
    "dosimetry",
    "mental effects"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": []
}

AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: Not supplied
PubMed: 395588

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library