RF Safe

Exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields and risk of cancer: Epidemiology is not enough!

Environment International · 2024 · Unclear · Insufficient evidence

← Research stream
UnclearInsufficient evidencePaper 235

Exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields and risk of cancer: Epidemiology is not enough! (Response to Karipidis et al. 2024) Di Ciaula A, Petronio MG, Bersani F, Belpoggi F. Exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields and risk of cancer: Epidem…

Study snapshot

PublicationEnvironment International · 2024
Study typeother
Reported directionUnclear
Evidence ratingInsufficient

Abstract

Exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields and risk of cancer: Epidemiology is not enough! (Response to Karipidis et al. 2024) Di Ciaula A, Petronio MG, Bersani F, Belpoggi F. Exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields and risk of cancer: Epidemiology is not enough! Environment International. Volume 196, 2025. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2025.109275. No abstract Open access paper: sciencedirect.com

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeother
Effect directionunclear
PopulationNot supplied
Sample sizeNot supplied
ExposureRF
Evidence strengthInsufficientConfidence: 42% · Peer reviewed: unknown

Main findings

Exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields and risk of cancer: Epidemiology is not enough! (Response to Karipidis et al. 2024) Di Ciaula A, Petronio MG, Bersani F, Belpoggi F. Exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields and risk of cancer: Epidem…

Outcomes measured

  • cancer risk

Limitations

  • No abstract provided; findings and methods cannot be extracted from the supplied text.
  • Article appears to be a response/commentary ("Response to Karipidis et al. 2024"), limiting extractable empirical details from the provided metadata.
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "other",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "RF",
    "source": null,
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": null,
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "cancer risk"
  ],
  "main_findings": null,
  "effect_direction": "unclear",
  "limitations": [
    "No abstract provided; findings and methods cannot be extracted from the supplied text.",
    "Article appears to be a response/commentary (\"Response to Karipidis et al. 2024\"), limiting extractable empirical details from the provided metadata."
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "insufficient",
  "confidence": 0.42,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "unknown",
  "keywords": [
    "radiofrequency",
    "electromagnetic fields",
    "RF-EMF",
    "cancer",
    "epidemiology",
    "response",
    "commentary"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": []
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2025.109275
PubMed: Not supplied

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library