Early research on the biological effects of microwave radiation: 1940–1960

1979 · Unclear · Insufficient evidence

← Research stream
UnclearInsufficient evidencePaper 6048

This historical review describes how early research on microwave biological effects from 1940 to 1960 was shaped by interest in medical diathermy and by uncertainty about radar-related exposure hazards. It reports that hazard reports in the late 1940s and ear…

Study snapshot

Publicationmanual · 1979
Study typereview
Reported directionUnclear
Evidence ratingInsufficient

Abstract

Two overriding considerations shaped the development of early research on the biological effects of microwave radiation—possible medical application (diathermy) and uncertainty about the hazards of exposure to radar. Reports in the late 1940s and early 1950s of hazards resulting from microwave exposure led to the near abandonment of medical research related to microwave diathermy at the same time that military and industrial concern over hazards grew, culminating in the massive research effort known as ‘the Tri-Service program’ (1957–1960). Both the early focus on medical application and the later search for hazards played important roles in dictating how this field of research developed as a science.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typereview
Effect directionunclear
PopulationNot supplied
Sample sizeNot supplied
Exposuremicrowave
Evidence strengthInsufficientConfidence: 92% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

This historical review describes how early research on microwave biological effects from 1940 to 1960 was shaped by interest in medical diathermy and by uncertainty about radar-related exposure hazards. It reports that hazard reports in the late 1940s and early 1950s shifted attention away from medical applications toward military and industrial hazard research, including the Tri-Service program.

Outcomes measured

  • biological effects of microwave radiation
  • hazards of microwave exposure
  • medical application related to microwave diathermy

Limitations

  • Historical/descriptive review rather than a primary empirical study
  • No specific experimental results, effect estimates, or sample details are provided in the abstract
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "review",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "microwave",
    "source": "radar",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": null,
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "biological effects of microwave radiation",
    "hazards of microwave exposure",
    "medical application related to microwave diathermy"
  ],
  "main_findings": "This historical review describes how early research on microwave biological effects from 1940 to 1960 was shaped by interest in medical diathermy and by uncertainty about radar-related exposure hazards. It reports that hazard reports in the late 1940s and early 1950s shifted attention away from medical applications toward military and industrial hazard research, including the Tri-Service program.",
  "effect_direction": "unclear",
  "limitations": [
    "Historical/descriptive review rather than a primary empirical study",
    "No specific experimental results, effect estimates, or sample details are provided in the abstract"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "insufficient",
  "confidence": 0.92,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "microwave radiation",
    "radar",
    "diathermy",
    "biological effects",
    "hazards",
    "Tri-Service program",
    "history of research"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": []
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1080/00033798000200271
PubMed: 11610730

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library