Cardiac function in Vimba vimba embryos under electromagnetic exposure at hatchery-relevant intensities.

PloS one · 2025 · Mixed · Low evidence

← Research stream

MixedLow evidencePaper 5878

Study snapshot

PublicationPloS one · 2025

Study typeanimal

Reported directionMixed

Evidence ratingLow

Abstract

The increasing expansion of energy infrastructure and anthropogenic transformation of the environment have introduced electromagnetic fields (EMFs) into aquatic ecosystems. While studies on the impact of EMFs on aquatic organisms are growing, their effects on fish embryonic development remain poorly understood. This study investigated the influence of electromagnetic exposure dominated by the magnetic (B) component, measured at 11.15 (± 2.24) μT and 50 Hz, on the heart rate of vimba bream (Vimba vimba) embryos, a species of conservation significance in aquaculture. The electric (E) component was not measured, and its potential contribution cannot be excluded. Fertilized V. vimba eggs were incubated under control conditions or exposed to an EMF, and embryonic heart rate was monitored in two experimental series to assess both short- and long-term EMF effects. In Experiment 1, embryos were incubated either under EMF (Variant B, n = 18) or control conditions (Variant A, n = 18) and observed without additional exposure. In Experiment 2, embryos incubated under EMF (Variant D, n = 30) or control conditions (Variant C, n = 30) were exposed to EMF during microscopic observation. Bayesian non-linear mixed models revealed significant EMF effects in both experiments. Embryos exposed to EMF during incubation (Variant B) displayed a 23.5% higher baseline heart rate (95% CI: 14.5-31.9%) compared to controls. In Experiment 2, embryos exposed to EMF during observation (Variant D) showed a rapid heart rate increase of 29.0% (95% CI: 21.5-37.6%). Embryos exposed to EMF during incubation exhibited a diminished response to subsequent EMF exposure, suggesting physiological adaptation. Additionally, EMF exposure during incubation was associated with reduced inter-individual variability in heart rate, suggesting a homogenizing effect on embryonic cardiac responses. These findings demonstrate measurable cardiac responses of fish embryos to hatchery-relevant electromagnetic exposure and highlight compensatory mechanisms regulating heart rate. While the results suggest fish embryos can adapt to such electromagnetic exposure, further studies are required to disentangle the roles of both magnetic and electric components and to evaluate long-term physiological and ecological consequences.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeanimal

Effect directionmixed

PopulationVimba vimba (vimba bream) embryos (fertilized eggs)

Sample size96

ExposureELF · 0.05 MHz · Incubation exposure and/or exposure during microscopic observation; assessed for short- and long-term effects (exact durations not stated)

Evidence strengthLowConfidence: 78% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

Embryos exposed to a 50 Hz EMF dominated by the magnetic component (B = 11.15 ± 2.24 μT) showed significant increases in heart rate. In Experiment 1, incubation under EMF was associated with a 23.5% higher baseline heart rate versus controls; in Experiment 2, EMF exposure during observation produced a rapid 29.0% heart rate increase, and embryos previously exposed during incubation showed a diminished response to subsequent exposure, consistent with adaptation.

Outcomes measured

Embryonic heart rate (baseline and response to subsequent EMF exposure)
Inter-individual variability in heart rate

Limitations

Electric (E) component was not measured; its contribution cannot be excluded
Exposure duration details not provided in abstract
Long-term physiological/ecological consequences not evaluated (authors note further studies needed)

View raw extracted JSON

{
  "study_type": "animal",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "ELF",
    "source": "hatchery-relevant (aquaculture incubation/observation setting)",
    "frequency_mhz": 0.05,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": "Incubation exposure and/or exposure during microscopic observation; assessed for short- and long-term effects (exact durations not stated)"
  },
  "population": "Vimba vimba (vimba bream) embryos (fertilized eggs)",
  "sample_size": 96,
  "outcomes": [
    "Embryonic heart rate (baseline and response to subsequent EMF exposure)",
    "Inter-individual variability in heart rate"
  ],
  "main_findings": "Embryos exposed to a 50 Hz EMF dominated by the magnetic component (B = 11.15 ± 2.24 μT) showed significant increases in heart rate. In Experiment 1, incubation under EMF was associated with a 23.5% higher baseline heart rate versus controls; in Experiment 2, EMF exposure during observation produced a rapid 29.0% heart rate increase, and embryos previously exposed during incubation showed a diminished response to subsequent exposure, consistent with adaptation.",
  "effect_direction": "mixed",
  "limitations": [
    "Electric (E) component was not measured; its contribution cannot be excluded",
    "Exposure duration details not provided in abstract",
    "Long-term physiological/ecological consequences not evaluated (authors note further studies needed)"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "low",
  "confidence": 0.78,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "electromagnetic fields",
    "ELF EMF",
    "50 Hz",
    "magnetic field",
    "microtesla",
    "fish embryos",
    "Vimba vimba",
    "heart rate",
    "aquaculture",
    "hatchery"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "occupational-exposure",
      "weight": 0.2,
      "reason": "Exposure described as hatchery-relevant intensities in an aquaculture setting (environmental/operational EMF context)."
    }
  ]
}

AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0334035
PubMed: 41060938

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library