Crosstalk between 6-methyladenine and 4-methylcytosine in exposed to extremely low-frequency electromagnetic field.
← Research streamMethylomes and transcriptomes were investigated under different intensities of extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields (ELF-EMF). The distance variation between certain 6mA sites (O-6mA) and neighboring motif-associated 6mA (M-6mA) increased with ELF-E…
Study snapshot
Abstract
4-Methylcytosine (4mC) and 6-methyladenine (6mA) are the most prevalent types of DNA modifications in prokaryotes. However, whether there is crosstalk between 4mC and 6mA remain unknown. Here, methylomes and transcriptomes of exposed to different intensities of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields (ELF-EMF) were investigated. Results showed that the second adenine of all the 5'-GTACAG-3' motif was modified to 6mA (M-6mA). For the other 6mA (O-6mA), the variation in their distance from the neighboring M-6mA increased with the intensity of ELF-EMF. Moreover, cytosine adjacent to O-6mA has a much higher probability of being modified to 4mC than cytosine adjacent to M-6mA, and the closer an unmodified cytosine is to 4mC, the higher the probability that the cytosine will be modified to 4mC. Furthermore, there was no significant correlation between DNA methylation and gene expression regulation. These results suggest a reference signal that goes from M-6mA to O-6mA to 4mC.
AI evidence extraction
Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.
Main findings
Methylomes and transcriptomes were investigated under different intensities of extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields (ELF-EMF). The distance variation between certain 6mA sites (O-6mA) and neighboring motif-associated 6mA (M-6mA) increased with ELF-EMF intensity, and cytosines adjacent to O-6mA were more likely to be modified to 4mC than those adjacent to M-6mA. No significant correlation between DNA methylation and gene expression regulation was reported.
Outcomes measured
- DNA methylation (6-methyladenine; 6mA)
- DNA methylation (4-methylcytosine; 4mC)
- Methylome changes across ELF-EMF intensities
- Transcriptome / gene expression
- Correlation between DNA methylation and gene expression
Limitations
- Study organism/cell type not specified in the abstract
- ELF-EMF frequency, exposure duration, and specific intensity values are not provided in the abstract
- Sample size and replication details are not provided in the abstract
- Findings are focused on prokaryotic DNA modifications; generalizability beyond the studied system is unclear from the abstract
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "other",
"exposure": {
"band": "ELF",
"source": null,
"frequency_mhz": null,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": null
},
"population": null,
"sample_size": null,
"outcomes": [
"DNA methylation (6-methyladenine; 6mA)",
"DNA methylation (4-methylcytosine; 4mC)",
"Methylome changes across ELF-EMF intensities",
"Transcriptome / gene expression",
"Correlation between DNA methylation and gene expression"
],
"main_findings": "Methylomes and transcriptomes were investigated under different intensities of extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields (ELF-EMF). The distance variation between certain 6mA sites (O-6mA) and neighboring motif-associated 6mA (M-6mA) increased with ELF-EMF intensity, and cytosines adjacent to O-6mA were more likely to be modified to 4mC than those adjacent to M-6mA. No significant correlation between DNA methylation and gene expression regulation was reported.",
"effect_direction": "mixed",
"limitations": [
"Study organism/cell type not specified in the abstract",
"ELF-EMF frequency, exposure duration, and specific intensity values are not provided in the abstract",
"Sample size and replication details are not provided in the abstract",
"Findings are focused on prokaryotic DNA modifications; generalizability beyond the studied system is unclear from the abstract"
],
"evidence_strength": "insufficient",
"confidence": 0.66,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"extremely low-frequency electromagnetic field",
"ELF-EMF",
"DNA methylation",
"6-methyladenine",
"6mA",
"4-methylcytosine",
"4mC",
"methylome",
"transcriptome",
"prokaryotes",
"motif 5'-GTACAG-3'"
],
"suggested_hubs": []
}AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.
Identifiers and source
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110607
PubMed: 39262814
Related papers
- Extremely low-frequency electromagnetic field (ELF-EMF) induces alterations in epigenetic regulation in the myometrium - An in vitro study 2023
- Extremely Low-Frequency Electromagnetic Field Impairs the Development of Honeybee 2022
- Effect of Occupational Extremely Low-Frequency Electromagnetic Field Exposure on the Thyroid Gland of Workers: A Prospective Study 2022
- The Subjective and Objective Improvement of Non-Invasive Treatment of Schumann Resonance in Insomnia-A Randomized and Double-Blinded Study 2022
- Effect of an Extremely Low-Frequency Electromagnetic Field on the Concentration of Salivary Immunoglobulin A 2022
- Short-Term Extremely Low-Frequency Electromagnetic Field Inhibits Synaptic Plasticity of Schaffer Collateral- CA1 Synapses in Rat Hippocampus via the Ca 2+/Calcineurin Pathway 2021