Dose Estimation for Indoor Radon, Occupational Radiation, and Electromagnetic Field Exposure in a Nuclear Medicine Department in Turkiye.

Health physics · 2025 · No effect · Low evidence

← Research stream
No effectLow evidencePaper 5817

Over 1 year of monitoring in a nuclear medicine department, results from electronic personnel dosimeters, radon gas measurements, and electric field (EMF) measurements were reported to be far below national and international legal dose limits.

Study snapshot

PublicationHealth physics · 2025
Study typeexposure_assessment
Reported directionNo effect
Evidence ratingLow

Abstract

In this study, the occupational radiation dose, radon gas, and non-ionizing radiation doses originating from electromagnetic fields (EMF) to which radiation workers are exposed were monitored and evaluated for 1 y. Using electronic personnel dosimeters (EPD), average daily radiation doses based on the number of patients and annual average effective dose results of radiation workers were obtained over a period of 1 y. Also, the annual effective dose and risk values were calculated for 8 h and 24 h by taking radon gas measurements at 2-mo intervals in the nuclear medicine department. Finally, electric field measurements were made one day a week in the selected areas. All the results obtained were compared with national and international dose limits. The results obtained as a result of EPD, radon gas, and EMF measurements made in the nuclear medicine department were found to be far below the international and national legal dose limits.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeexposure_assessment
Effect directionno_effect
PopulationRadiation workers in a nuclear medicine department in Turkiye
Sample sizeNot supplied
Exposure1 y (radiation dose monitoring); radon measured at 2-mo intervals; electric field measured 1 day/week
Evidence strengthLowConfidence: 74% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

Over 1 year of monitoring in a nuclear medicine department, results from electronic personnel dosimeters, radon gas measurements, and electric field (EMF) measurements were reported to be far below national and international legal dose limits.

Outcomes measured

  • Occupational radiation dose (effective dose)
  • Indoor radon gas measurements (annual effective dose and risk for 8 h and 24 h)
  • Electric field measurements (EMF exposure)
  • Comparison to national and international dose limits

Limitations

  • Sample size not reported in abstract
  • EMF exposure characterized only by electric field measurements (frequency/source details not provided)
  • Electric field measurements performed one day per week (may not capture full temporal variability)
  • No health outcomes assessed; focus is on exposure/dose relative to limits
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "exposure_assessment",
  "exposure": {
    "band": null,
    "source": "occupational",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": "1 y (radiation dose monitoring); radon measured at 2-mo intervals; electric field measured 1 day/week"
  },
  "population": "Radiation workers in a nuclear medicine department in Turkiye",
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "Occupational radiation dose (effective dose)",
    "Indoor radon gas measurements (annual effective dose and risk for 8 h and 24 h)",
    "Electric field measurements (EMF exposure)",
    "Comparison to national and international dose limits"
  ],
  "main_findings": "Over 1 year of monitoring in a nuclear medicine department, results from electronic personnel dosimeters, radon gas measurements, and electric field (EMF) measurements were reported to be far below national and international legal dose limits.",
  "effect_direction": "no_effect",
  "limitations": [
    "Sample size not reported in abstract",
    "EMF exposure characterized only by electric field measurements (frequency/source details not provided)",
    "Electric field measurements performed one day per week (may not capture full temporal variability)",
    "No health outcomes assessed; focus is on exposure/dose relative to limits"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "low",
  "confidence": 0.74,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "occupational exposure",
    "nuclear medicine department",
    "electronic personnel dosimeter",
    "radon",
    "non-ionizing radiation",
    "electromagnetic fields",
    "electric field measurements",
    "dose limits",
    "Turkiye"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "occupational-exposure",
      "weight": 0.9,
      "reason": "Assesses occupational EMF (electric field) exposure and compares to limits in a nuclear medicine workplace."
    }
  ]
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1097/hp.0000000000001934
PubMed: 39656106

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library