Estimating transmitted power density from mobile phone: an epidemiological pilot study with a software modified phone.
← Research streamIn 10 participants, total transmitted power density from mobile phone use (calls, cellular data, and Wi-Fi surfing) was reported to be many orders of magnitude higher than total received power density. Cellular data use contributed the largest portion of tota…
Study snapshot
Abstract
The aims of this study were to evaluate the weekly and annual cumulative radiofrequency-electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) exposure attributed to mobile phone (MP) use, and assess whether a novel app (Quanta Monitor™) could be employed in a small human sample to characterise the RF-EMF exposures associated with the use of MPs. Ten participants provided their two months' daily objective data on their MP exposures (i.e. transmitted and received power densities) attributed to different modes of MP usage such as cellular calls, cellular data and Wi-Fi. The results demonstrated that total transmitted power density (cellular phone calls, data and Wi-Fi surfing) could be many orders of magnitude higher than that from the total received power density. Of the total transmitted power density, cellular data use contributed the largest portion. Our study showed that Quanta Monitor™ could be employed in prospective assessment of exposures to MPs in epidemiological studies.
AI evidence extraction
Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.
Main findings
In 10 participants, total transmitted power density from mobile phone use (calls, cellular data, and Wi-Fi surfing) was reported to be many orders of magnitude higher than total received power density. Cellular data use contributed the largest portion of total transmitted power density. The authors report that the Quanta Monitor™ app could be used for prospective exposure assessment in epidemiological studies.
Outcomes measured
- Weekly cumulative RF-EMF exposure attributed to mobile phone use
- Annual cumulative RF-EMF exposure attributed to mobile phone use
- Transmitted power density (by mode: cellular calls, cellular data, Wi-Fi)
- Received power density (by mode: cellular calls, cellular data, Wi-Fi)
- Feasibility of using Quanta Monitor™ app to characterise mobile phone RF-EMF exposure
Limitations
- Pilot study with a very small sample size (n=10)
- Exposure metrics limited to power densities recorded by a software-modified phone/app; no other measurement methods described
- Only two months of monitoring reported
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "exposure_assessment",
"exposure": {
"band": "RF",
"source": "mobile phone",
"frequency_mhz": null,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": "Two months of daily objective data; weekly and annual cumulative exposure estimated"
},
"population": "10 human participants",
"sample_size": 10,
"outcomes": [
"Weekly cumulative RF-EMF exposure attributed to mobile phone use",
"Annual cumulative RF-EMF exposure attributed to mobile phone use",
"Transmitted power density (by mode: cellular calls, cellular data, Wi-Fi)",
"Received power density (by mode: cellular calls, cellular data, Wi-Fi)",
"Feasibility of using Quanta Monitor™ app to characterise mobile phone RF-EMF exposure"
],
"main_findings": "In 10 participants, total transmitted power density from mobile phone use (calls, cellular data, and Wi-Fi surfing) was reported to be many orders of magnitude higher than total received power density. Cellular data use contributed the largest portion of total transmitted power density. The authors report that the Quanta Monitor™ app could be used for prospective exposure assessment in epidemiological studies.",
"effect_direction": "unclear",
"limitations": [
"Pilot study with a very small sample size (n=10)",
"Exposure metrics limited to power densities recorded by a software-modified phone/app; no other measurement methods described",
"Only two months of monitoring reported"
],
"evidence_strength": "very_low",
"confidence": 0.74,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"RF-EMF",
"radiofrequency",
"mobile phone",
"exposure assessment",
"power density",
"transmitted power density",
"received power density",
"cellular calls",
"cellular data",
"Wi-Fi",
"Quanta Monitor"
],
"suggested_hubs": []
}AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.
Identifiers and source
DOI: 10.1007/s13246-018-0699-7
PubMed: 30338493
Related papers
- Solutions for EM exposure assessment of 5G wireless devices 2018
- Radiofrequency exposure levels in Amsterdam schools 2017
- In-Situ Measurements of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields Measurements Around 5G Macro Base Stations in the UK 2025
- 5G EMF Exposure at 3.6 GHz in Greece Using Data From Frequency-Selective Monitoring Sensors 2025
- APPLICATION OF TIME-AVERAGED AND INTEGRAL-BASED MEASURE FOR MEASUREMENT RESULTS VARIABILITY REDUCTION IN GSM/DCS/UMTS SYSTEMS. 2019
- Limitations of Incident Power Density as a Proxy for Induced Electromagnetic Fields 2020