Electromagnetic field pattern in the environment of GSM base stations.

International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health · 1999 · Unclear · Insufficient evidence

← Research stream
UnclearInsufficient evidencePaper 5370

The paper analyzes radiation intensity characteristics of GSM base station antennas using EMF measurements conducted by experts from two research institutes; for inaccessible antennas, measurements were performed in an accredited laboratory.

Study snapshot

PublicationInternational journal of occupational medicine and environmental health · 1999
Study typeexposure_assessment
Reported directionUnclear
Evidence ratingInsufficient

Abstract

Three mobile phone systems are used in Poland: analog, operated at the 450 MHz frequency range, and two digital systems operated at 900 MHz and 1800 MHz. The GSM--Global System for Mobile Communication meets all relevant requirements, and it is most widely used throughout the world. According to the mobile phone concept, the whole communication area is divided into sub-areas (cells) where base stations are located. The base stations are provided with the transmitter units mounted on free-standing masts, high chimneys and building roofs, including those of the residential buildings. The transmitter antennas of the base stations constitute a source of 935-960 EMF radiation. This work analyses the essential characteristics of the base station antennas from the point of view of radiation intensity. The analysis is based on the results of EMF measurements performed by experts of two relevant research institutes. For inaccessible antennas, the measurements were performed at the accredited laboratory.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeexposure_assessment
Effect directionunclear
PopulationNot supplied
Sample sizeNot supplied
ExposureRF
Evidence strengthInsufficientConfidence: 66% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

The paper analyzes radiation intensity characteristics of GSM base station antennas using EMF measurements conducted by experts from two research institutes; for inaccessible antennas, measurements were performed in an accredited laboratory.

Outcomes measured

  • EMF radiation intensity/pattern around GSM base station antennas
  • Environmental RF EMF measurements near base stations

Limitations

  • No quantitative measurement results reported in the abstract
  • No health outcomes assessed in the abstract
  • Sample size and measurement locations/conditions not described in the abstract
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "exposure_assessment",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "RF",
    "source": "base station",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": null,
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "EMF radiation intensity/pattern around GSM base station antennas",
    "Environmental RF EMF measurements near base stations"
  ],
  "main_findings": "The paper analyzes radiation intensity characteristics of GSM base station antennas using EMF measurements conducted by experts from two research institutes; for inaccessible antennas, measurements were performed in an accredited laboratory.",
  "effect_direction": "unclear",
  "limitations": [
    "No quantitative measurement results reported in the abstract",
    "No health outcomes assessed in the abstract",
    "Sample size and measurement locations/conditions not described in the abstract"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "insufficient",
  "confidence": 0.66,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "GSM",
    "base station",
    "antenna",
    "RF EMF",
    "environmental measurements",
    "radiation intensity",
    "935-960 MHz",
    "Poland"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": []
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: Not supplied
PubMed: 10360084

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library