Effects of pulsed and sinusoid electromagnetic fields on human chondrocytes cultivated in a collagen matrix.
← Research streamContinuous exposure to pulsed EMFs (max 2 mT; burst frequency 16.7 Hz; 20 pulses per burst) or sinusoidal EMFs (max 2 mT; 50 Hz) during up to 14 days of 3D culture showed no differences versus unexposed controls in immunohistological staining for type-II coll…
Study snapshot
Abstract
Although several effects of electromagnetic fields (EMFs) on articular cartilage have been reported in recent studies, the use of EMFs to treat osteoarthritis remains a matter of debate. In an in vitro study, human chondrocytes harvested from osteoarthritic knee joints were released from their surrounding matrix and transferred in defined concentration into a 3D matrix (type-I collagen gel). The cultivation, performed under standard conditions, lasted up to 14 days. During this time, treatment groups were continuously exposed to either sinusoid or pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMFs). The PEMFs revealed the following characteristics: maximum magnetic flux density of 2 mT, frequency of the bursts of 16.7 Hz with each burst consisting of 20 pulses. Similarly, the sinusoid EMFs also induced a maximum flux density of 2 mT with a frequency of 50 Hz. Control groups consisting of equal number of samples were not exposed to EMF. Immunohistological examinations of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples revealed positive staining for type-II collagen and proteoglycans in the immediate pericellular region with no differences between the two different treatment groups and the control groups. With increasing cultivation time, both type-II collagen and aggrecan gene expression declined, but no significant differences in gene expression were found between the treatment and control groups. In conclusion, using our in vitro setting, we were unable to detect any effects of pulsed and sinusoidal magnetic fields on human adult osteoarthritic chondrocytes.
AI evidence extraction
Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.
Main findings
Continuous exposure to pulsed EMFs (max 2 mT; burst frequency 16.7 Hz; 20 pulses per burst) or sinusoidal EMFs (max 2 mT; 50 Hz) during up to 14 days of 3D culture showed no differences versus unexposed controls in immunohistological staining for type-II collagen and proteoglycans. Type-II collagen and aggrecan gene expression declined over time, with no significant differences between exposed and control groups.
Outcomes measured
- Type-II collagen staining (immunohistology)
- Proteoglycan staining (immunohistology)
- Type-II collagen gene expression
- Aggrecan gene expression
Limitations
- In vitro model (3D collagen gel) may not reflect in vivo cartilage/osteoarthritis physiology
- Sample size not reported in abstract
- Exposure conditions limited to 2 mT at 16.7 Hz (pulsed bursts) and 50 Hz (sinusoid)
- Outcomes limited to staining and gene expression measures reported
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "in_vitro",
"exposure": {
"band": "ELF",
"source": "other",
"frequency_mhz": null,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": "continuous exposure during cultivation up to 14 days"
},
"population": "Human adult osteoarthritic chondrocytes harvested from knee joints (cultivated in 3D type-I collagen gel)",
"sample_size": null,
"outcomes": [
"Type-II collagen staining (immunohistology)",
"Proteoglycan staining (immunohistology)",
"Type-II collagen gene expression",
"Aggrecan gene expression"
],
"main_findings": "Continuous exposure to pulsed EMFs (max 2 mT; burst frequency 16.7 Hz; 20 pulses per burst) or sinusoidal EMFs (max 2 mT; 50 Hz) during up to 14 days of 3D culture showed no differences versus unexposed controls in immunohistological staining for type-II collagen and proteoglycans. Type-II collagen and aggrecan gene expression declined over time, with no significant differences between exposed and control groups.",
"effect_direction": "no_effect",
"limitations": [
"In vitro model (3D collagen gel) may not reflect in vivo cartilage/osteoarthritis physiology",
"Sample size not reported in abstract",
"Exposure conditions limited to 2 mT at 16.7 Hz (pulsed bursts) and 50 Hz (sinusoid)",
"Outcomes limited to staining and gene expression measures reported"
],
"evidence_strength": "low",
"confidence": 0.78,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"electromagnetic fields",
"pulsed electromagnetic fields",
"PEMF",
"sinusoidal magnetic field",
"ELF",
"2 mT",
"16.7 Hz",
"50 Hz",
"human chondrocytes",
"osteoarthritis",
"collagen matrix",
"type-II collagen",
"aggrecan",
"proteoglycans"
],
"suggested_hubs": []
}AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.
Identifiers and source
DOI: 10.1007/s00296-008-0565-0
PubMed: 18389240
Related papers
- An Investigation on the Effect of ELF Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields on Human Electrocardiograms 2016
- Effects of extremely low-frequency pulsed electromagnetic fields on morphological and biochemical properties of human breast carcinoma cells (T47D). 2012
- Magnetically Stimulated Myogenesis Recruits a CRY2-TRPC1 Photosensitive Signaling Axis 2025
- Effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields on tumor cell viability: a meta-analysis of in vitro randomized controlled experiments 2021
- The Role of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields on the Radical Pair Mechanism 2021
- Randomised, placebo-controlled trial of transcranial pulsed EMF in patients with multiple chemical sensitivity 2016