[Development of innovative methods of electromagnetic field evaluation for portable radio-station].

Meditsina truda i promyshlennaia ekologiia · 2013 · Harm · Low evidence

← Research stream
HarmLow evidencePaper 4599

Measurements of EMF emissions from the portable radio-station "Radiy-301" and evaluation of SAR suggested that workers' EMF exposure levels may exceed hygienic norms and therefore may represent a health risk factor. The paper also considers improving EMF dosi…

Study snapshot

PublicationMeditsina truda i promyshlennaia ekologiia · 2013
Study typeexposure_assessment
Reported directionHarm
Evidence ratingLow

Abstract

The results of portable radio-station "Radiy-301" electromagnetic fields (EMF) emission measurement and specific absorption rate data evaluation has shown that workers' exposure EMF levels may elevate hygienic norms and hereupon can be health risk factor. Possible way of portable radio-station EMF dosimetry enhancement by means of domestic and international approaches harmonization is considered.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeexposure_assessment
Effect directionharm
Populationworkers
Sample sizeNot supplied
ExposureNot supplied
Evidence strengthLowConfidence: 66% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

Measurements of EMF emissions from the portable radio-station "Radiy-301" and evaluation of SAR suggested that workers' EMF exposure levels may exceed hygienic norms and therefore may represent a health risk factor. The paper also considers improving EMF dosimetry for portable radio-stations via harmonization of domestic and international approaches.

Outcomes measured

  • EMF emission levels (measurement)
  • Specific absorption rate (SAR) evaluation
  • Exceedance of hygienic norms (occupational exposure limits)
  • Potential health risk factor (inferred from exceedance)

Limitations

  • No frequency, quantitative exposure levels, or SAR values reported in the abstract.
  • Study design details and sample size are not provided.
  • Health outcomes were not measured; health risk is inferred from potential exceedance of hygienic norms.
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "exposure_assessment",
  "exposure": {
    "band": null,
    "source": "portable radio-station",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": "workers",
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "EMF emission levels (measurement)",
    "Specific absorption rate (SAR) evaluation",
    "Exceedance of hygienic norms (occupational exposure limits)",
    "Potential health risk factor (inferred from exceedance)"
  ],
  "main_findings": "Measurements of EMF emissions from the portable radio-station \"Radiy-301\" and evaluation of SAR suggested that workers' EMF exposure levels may exceed hygienic norms and therefore may represent a health risk factor. The paper also considers improving EMF dosimetry for portable radio-stations via harmonization of domestic and international approaches.",
  "effect_direction": "harm",
  "limitations": [
    "No frequency, quantitative exposure levels, or SAR values reported in the abstract.",
    "Study design details and sample size are not provided.",
    "Health outcomes were not measured; health risk is inferred from potential exceedance of hygienic norms."
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "low",
  "confidence": 0.66,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "portable radio-station",
    "Radiy-301",
    "electromagnetic fields",
    "EMF measurement",
    "specific absorption rate",
    "SAR",
    "occupational exposure",
    "hygienic norms",
    "dosimetry",
    "harmonization"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "occupational-exposure",
      "weight": 0.9,
      "reason": "Focuses on workers' EMF exposure from a portable radio-station and comparison to hygienic norms."
    }
  ]
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: Not supplied
PubMed: 23785811

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library