[The use of a pulsed traveling magnetic field in patients with chronic obstructive bronchitis].

Voprosy kurortologii, fizioterapii, i lechebnoi fizicheskoi kultury · 1997 · Benefit · Very low evidence

← Research stream
BenefitVery low evidencePaper 4123

A course of treatment with a pulsed traveling (running) magnetic field generated by the ALIMP-1 unit in patients with chronic obstructive bronchitis was associated with a subjective response and higher exercise tolerance, attributed to improved external respi…

Study snapshot

PublicationVoprosy kurortologii, fizioterapii, i lechebnoi fizicheskoi kultury · 1997
Study typeother
Reported directionBenefit
Evidence ratingVery low

Abstract

A course treatment with pulse running magnetic field generated by ALIMP-1 unit of patients with chronic obstructive bronchitis provides a subjective response, higher exercise tolerance due to improved function of the external respiration. The inductors-solenoids are fixed tangentially on the chest by means of the jacket.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeother
Effect directionbenefit
Populationpatients with chronic obstructive bronchitis
Sample sizeNot supplied
Exposurecourse treatment
Evidence strengthVery lowConfidence: 62% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

A course of treatment with a pulsed traveling (running) magnetic field generated by the ALIMP-1 unit in patients with chronic obstructive bronchitis was associated with a subjective response and higher exercise tolerance, attributed to improved external respiration function.

Outcomes measured

  • subjective response
  • exercise tolerance
  • external respiration function

Limitations

  • No sample size reported in abstract.
  • No control/comparator details provided in abstract despite being labeled a comparative study.
  • No exposure parameters (field strength, frequency, session duration) reported.
  • Outcomes appear partly subjective; measurement methods not described.
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "other",
  "exposure": {
    "band": null,
    "source": "therapeutic pulsed traveling magnetic field (ALIMP-1 unit)",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": "course treatment"
  },
  "population": "patients with chronic obstructive bronchitis",
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "subjective response",
    "exercise tolerance",
    "external respiration function"
  ],
  "main_findings": "A course of treatment with a pulsed traveling (running) magnetic field generated by the ALIMP-1 unit in patients with chronic obstructive bronchitis was associated with a subjective response and higher exercise tolerance, attributed to improved external respiration function.",
  "effect_direction": "benefit",
  "limitations": [
    "No sample size reported in abstract.",
    "No control/comparator details provided in abstract despite being labeled a comparative study.",
    "No exposure parameters (field strength, frequency, session duration) reported.",
    "Outcomes appear partly subjective; measurement methods not described."
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "very_low",
  "confidence": 0.62,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "pulsed magnetic field",
    "traveling magnetic field",
    "running magnetic field",
    "ALIMP-1",
    "magnetotherapy",
    "chronic obstructive bronchitis",
    "exercise tolerance",
    "external respiration"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "other",
      "weight": 0.2,
      "reason": "Therapeutic pulsed magnetic field intervention; no specific portal hub clearly applicable from abstract."
    }
  ]
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: Not supplied
PubMed: 9484022

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library