Growth of pea epicotyl in low magnetic field: implication for space research.

Advances in space research : the official journal of the Committee on Space Research (COSPAR) · 1999 · Mixed · Low evidence

← Research stream

MixedLow evidencePaper 4032

Study snapshot

PublicationAdvances in space research : the official journal of the Committee on Space Research (COSPAR) · 1999

Study typeanimal

Reported directionMixed

Evidence ratingLow

Abstract

A magnetic field is an inescapable environmental factor for plants on the earth. However, its impact on plant growth is not well understood. In order to survey how magnetic fields affect plant, Alaska pea seedlings were incubated under low magnetic field (LMF) and also in the normal geo-magnetic environment. Two-day-old etiolated seedlings were incubated in a magnetic shield box and in a control box. Sedimentation of amyloplasts was examined in the epicotyls of seedlings grown under these two conditions. The elongation of epicotyls was promoted by LMF. Elongation was most prominent in the middle part of the epicotyls. Cell elongation and increased osmotic pressure of cell sap were found in the epidermal cells exposed to LMF. When the gravitational environment was 1G, the epicotyls incubated under both LMF and normal geomagnetic field grew straight upward and amyloplasts sedimented similarly. However, under simulated microgravity (clinostat), epicotyl and cell elongation was promoted. Furthermore, the epicotyls bent and amyloplasts were dispersed in the cells in simulated microgravity. The dispersion of amyloplasts may relate to the posture control in epicotyl growth under simulated microgravity generated by 3D clinorotation, since it was not observed under LMF in 1G. Since enhanced elongation of cells was commonly seen both at LMF and in simulated microgravity, all elongation on the 3D-clinostat could result from pseudo-low magnetic field, as a by-product of clinorotation. (i.e., clinostat results could be based on randomization of magnetic field together with randomization of gravity vector.) Our results point to the possible use of space for studies in magnetic biology. With space experiments, the effects of dominant environmental factors, such as gravity on plants, could be neutralized or controlled for to reveal magnetic effects more clearly.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeanimal

Effect directionmixed

PopulationAlaska pea seedlings (two-day-old etiolated seedlings)

Sample sizeNot supplied

ExposureNot supplied

Evidence strengthLowConfidence: 74% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

Compared with normal geomagnetic conditions, epicotyl elongation was promoted under low magnetic field (LMF), most prominently in the middle part of the epicotyl. Epidermal cells exposed to LMF showed cell elongation and increased osmotic pressure of cell sap. Under 1G, seedlings in both LMF and normal geomagnetic field grew straight upward with similar amyloplast sedimentation, while under simulated microgravity (clinostat) epicotyl/cell elongation was promoted and epicotyls bent with dispersed amyloplasts.

Outcomes measured

Epicotyl elongation/growth
Cell elongation (epidermal cells)
Osmotic pressure of cell sap
Amyloplast sedimentation/dispersion
Epicotyl bending/posture control under simulated microgravity

Limitations

Magnetic field exposure level/strength not quantified in the abstract
No sample size or statistical details provided in the abstract
Plant/space-biology model; findings may not generalize beyond this experimental context
Simulated microgravity (clinostat) may introduce confounding (authors note possible pseudo-low magnetic field effects)

View raw extracted JSON

{
  "study_type": "animal",
  "exposure": {
    "band": null,
    "source": "magnetic shield box / low magnetic field vs normal geomagnetic field",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": "Alaska pea seedlings (two-day-old etiolated seedlings)",
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "Epicotyl elongation/growth",
    "Cell elongation (epidermal cells)",
    "Osmotic pressure of cell sap",
    "Amyloplast sedimentation/dispersion",
    "Epicotyl bending/posture control under simulated microgravity"
  ],
  "main_findings": "Compared with normal geomagnetic conditions, epicotyl elongation was promoted under low magnetic field (LMF), most prominently in the middle part of the epicotyl. Epidermal cells exposed to LMF showed cell elongation and increased osmotic pressure of cell sap. Under 1G, seedlings in both LMF and normal geomagnetic field grew straight upward with similar amyloplast sedimentation, while under simulated microgravity (clinostat) epicotyl/cell elongation was promoted and epicotyls bent with dispersed amyloplasts.",
  "effect_direction": "mixed",
  "limitations": [
    "Magnetic field exposure level/strength not quantified in the abstract",
    "No sample size or statistical details provided in the abstract",
    "Plant/space-biology model; findings may not generalize beyond this experimental context",
    "Simulated microgravity (clinostat) may introduce confounding (authors note possible pseudo-low magnetic field effects)"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "low",
  "confidence": 0.74,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "low magnetic field",
    "geomagnetic field",
    "pea seedlings",
    "epicotyl elongation",
    "amyloplast sedimentation",
    "clinostat",
    "simulated microgravity",
    "space research",
    "magnetic shielding"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "space-biology",
      "weight": 0.9,
      "reason": "Study explicitly examines low magnetic field and simulated microgravity with implications for space research."
    }
  ]
}

AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1016/s0273-1177(99)00342-7
PubMed: 11710386

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library