Application of capacitively coupled electric field enhances periimplant osteogenesis in the dog mandible.
← Research streamDaily application of capacitively coupled electric field (10-Vp-p, 60-kHz sine wave; 8 h/day) significantly increased the bone-contact ratio at 14, 21, and 30 days after implant placement compared with controls. Bone-area ratios at 14 and 21 days were signifi…
Study snapshot
Abstract
PURPOSE: Expeditious postoperative ingrowth of bone into dental implants is desired for clinically successful fixation of oral implants. The present study was performed to evaluate the effect of applying a capacitively coupled electric field (CCEF) on periimplant osteogenesis in the dog mandible. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve adult male beagles were used in this study. All of the premolars on both sides of the mandible were removed from each dog. A POI (Ti-6Al-4V) 3-piece implant (3.7 mm in diameter and 8.0 mm in length) whose surface had been treated with anodic oxidation was placed into each test site by self-tapping. Daily application of CCEF (8 h/day) was initiated on the day following the surgery and was continued through the day of sacrifice. A CCEF was induced by an external source delivering 10-Vp-p, 60-kHz sine-wave signals through an oral electrode plate. One side of the mandible of each dog was treated with CCEF, while the other side was not. On the control side, an oral electrode plate was attached for 8 hours per day, but CCEF was not applied. The effect of daily application of CCEF on the ingrowth of bone into the implant was examined at 14, 21, or 30 days after implant placement. A fourth control group was not treated with CCEF and was maintained for 90 days to confirm that CCEF treatment enhances bone ingrowth in dental implants. RESULTS: Daily application of CCEF significantly increased the bone-contact ratio at days 14, 21, and 30 after implant placement in comparison with the respective controls. The bone-area ratios of the 14- and 21-day CCEF-treated groups were significantly larger than those of the respective controls and were similar to those of the 90-day control group. CONCLUSION: CCEF treatment increases periimplant osteogenesis in the dog mandible, confirming its usefulness in oral implantology.
AI evidence extraction
Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.
Main findings
Daily application of capacitively coupled electric field (10-Vp-p, 60-kHz sine wave; 8 h/day) significantly increased the bone-contact ratio at 14, 21, and 30 days after implant placement compared with controls. Bone-area ratios at 14 and 21 days were significantly larger than controls and were similar to those of a 90-day control group.
Outcomes measured
- periimplant osteogenesis
- bone-contact ratio
- bone-area ratio
- bone ingrowth into implant
Limitations
- Animal study (dog mandible), not human clinical outcomes
- Specific implant type and surface treatment (anodic oxidation) may limit generalizability
- Exposure metrics beyond voltage and frequency (e.g., field strength at tissue, dosimetry/SAR) not reported in abstract
- Blinding/randomization not described in abstract
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "animal",
"exposure": {
"band": null,
"source": "capacitively coupled electric field (external source via oral electrode plate)",
"frequency_mhz": 0.06,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": "8 h/day (daily), from day after surgery through sacrifice (14, 21, or 30 days); additional 90-day control group without CCEF"
},
"population": "Twelve adult male beagles (dog mandible implant model)",
"sample_size": 12,
"outcomes": [
"periimplant osteogenesis",
"bone-contact ratio",
"bone-area ratio",
"bone ingrowth into implant"
],
"main_findings": "Daily application of capacitively coupled electric field (10-Vp-p, 60-kHz sine wave; 8 h/day) significantly increased the bone-contact ratio at 14, 21, and 30 days after implant placement compared with controls. Bone-area ratios at 14 and 21 days were significantly larger than controls and were similar to those of a 90-day control group.",
"effect_direction": "benefit",
"limitations": [
"Animal study (dog mandible), not human clinical outcomes",
"Specific implant type and surface treatment (anodic oxidation) may limit generalizability",
"Exposure metrics beyond voltage and frequency (e.g., field strength at tissue, dosimetry/SAR) not reported in abstract",
"Blinding/randomization not described in abstract"
],
"evidence_strength": "low",
"confidence": 0.78,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"capacitively coupled electric field",
"CCEF",
"60 kHz",
"electric field stimulation",
"dental implants",
"periimplant osteogenesis",
"bone-contact ratio",
"bone-area ratio",
"dog mandible",
"beagle"
],
"suggested_hubs": [
{
"slug": "animal-studies",
"weight": 0.7,
"reason": "In vivo dog model assessing biological effects of applied electric fields on bone/implant integration."
}
]
}AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.
Identifiers and source
DOI: Not supplied
PubMed: 11203655
Related papers
- Nociceptin inhibits electric field stimulation-induced cholinergic constrictions in rat airways. 2000
- Electromagnetic field exposure to human head model with various metal objects at sub-6 GHz frequencies 2023
- Promising applications of electromagnetic field therapy in dental implantology: A systematic review. 2024