Frequency of superior vena cava syndrome following radiofrequency modification of the sinus node and its management.

The American journal of cardiology · 2000 · Harm · Low evidence

← Research stream
HarmLow evidencePaper 3945

In 35 consecutive patients, having a permanent pacemaker appeared to be a strong risk factor for developing superior vena cava syndrome after radiofrequency modification of the sinus node. Balloon venoplasty for this complication was reported to be as effecti…

Study snapshot

PublicationThe American journal of cardiology · 2000
Study typecohort
Reported directionHarm
Evidence ratingLow

Abstract

In a series of 35 consecutive patients, the presence of a permanent pacemaker appears to be a strong risk factor for developing superior vena cava syndrome after radiofrequency modification of the sinus node. Treatment of this complication with balloon venoplasty is as effective as surgical repair.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typecohort
Effect directionharm
Population35 consecutive patients undergoing radiofrequency modification of the sinus node
Sample size35
ExposureNot supplied
Evidence strengthLowConfidence: 72% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

In 35 consecutive patients, having a permanent pacemaker appeared to be a strong risk factor for developing superior vena cava syndrome after radiofrequency modification of the sinus node. Balloon venoplasty for this complication was reported to be as effective as surgical repair.

Outcomes measured

  • Superior vena cava syndrome (frequency/risk factors)
  • Management outcomes: balloon venoplasty vs surgical repair

Limitations

  • No quantitative effect estimates or event counts provided in the abstract
  • Study design details (e.g., follow-up duration, comparison groups) not described in the abstract
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "cohort",
  "exposure": {
    "band": null,
    "source": "radiofrequency modification of the sinus node (cardiac ablation)",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": "35 consecutive patients undergoing radiofrequency modification of the sinus node",
  "sample_size": 35,
  "outcomes": [
    "Superior vena cava syndrome (frequency/risk factors)",
    "Management outcomes: balloon venoplasty vs surgical repair"
  ],
  "main_findings": "In 35 consecutive patients, having a permanent pacemaker appeared to be a strong risk factor for developing superior vena cava syndrome after radiofrequency modification of the sinus node. Balloon venoplasty for this complication was reported to be as effective as surgical repair.",
  "effect_direction": "harm",
  "limitations": [
    "No quantitative effect estimates or event counts provided in the abstract",
    "Study design details (e.g., follow-up duration, comparison groups) not described in the abstract"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "low",
  "confidence": 0.72,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "radiofrequency modification",
    "sinus node",
    "superior vena cava syndrome",
    "permanent pacemaker",
    "balloon venoplasty",
    "surgical repair"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": []
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00860-7
PubMed: 12000059

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library