[Effect of gradient magnetic field on growth of stem pearls of Dioscorea opposita during seedling stage].

Zhongguo Zhong yao za zhi = Zhongguo zhongyao zazhi = China journal of Chinese materia medica · 2000 · Benefit · Very low evidence

← Research stream
BenefitVery low evidencePaper 3942

Stem pearls treated twice with a gradient magnetic field showed the best growth during the seedling stage. Compared with control, emergence rate increased by 38.60%, root number increased by 8%, and average root length increased by 2.62 cm; an F-test for aver…

Study snapshot

PublicationZhongguo Zhong yao za zhi = Zhongguo zhongyao zazhi = China journal of Chinese materia medica · 2000
Study typeother
Reported directionBenefit
Evidence ratingVery low

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To probe into the bioeffect of gradient magnetic field on the growth and development of medicinal plants. METHODS: Gradient magnetic field with transmission belt was applied to treat the stem pearis of Dioscorea opposita before sowing and an evaluation of the pearl growth during the seedling stage was made. RESULT: Treated with twice gradient magnetic field, the stem pearls grew the best in the seedling stage. Compared with the control, the rate of emergence increased by 38.60%, root number increased by 8%, and the average root length increased by 2.62 cm. By F Test, the average root length was F = 19.98, F0.05 = 6.94 and F0.01 = 18.00. CONCLUSION: Proper magnetic field intensities can promote the growth of medicinal plants.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeother
Effect directionbenefit
PopulationDioscorea opposita (medicinal plant) stem pearls during seedling stage
Sample sizeNot supplied
ExposureNot supplied
Evidence strengthVery lowConfidence: 66% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

Stem pearls treated twice with a gradient magnetic field showed the best growth during the seedling stage. Compared with control, emergence rate increased by 38.60%, root number increased by 8%, and average root length increased by 2.62 cm; an F-test for average root length is reported (F=19.98; F0.05=6.94; F0.01=18.00).

Outcomes measured

  • rate of emergence
  • root number
  • average root length

Limitations

  • No sample size reported in abstract
  • Magnetic field intensity and other exposure parameters not reported in abstract
  • Study design details (randomization/blinding) not described
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "other",
  "exposure": {
    "band": null,
    "source": "gradient magnetic field (pre-sowing treatment with transmission belt)",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": "Dioscorea opposita (medicinal plant) stem pearls during seedling stage",
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "rate of emergence",
    "root number",
    "average root length"
  ],
  "main_findings": "Stem pearls treated twice with a gradient magnetic field showed the best growth during the seedling stage. Compared with control, emergence rate increased by 38.60%, root number increased by 8%, and average root length increased by 2.62 cm; an F-test for average root length is reported (F=19.98; F0.05=6.94; F0.01=18.00).",
  "effect_direction": "benefit",
  "limitations": [
    "No sample size reported in abstract",
    "Magnetic field intensity and other exposure parameters not reported in abstract",
    "Study design details (randomization/blinding) not described"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "very_low",
  "confidence": 0.66,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "gradient magnetic field",
    "magnetic field treatment",
    "Dioscorea opposita",
    "medicinal plants",
    "seedling stage",
    "emergence rate",
    "root growth"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": []
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: Not supplied
PubMed: 12512421

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library