[Changes in the autonomic status in vegetovascular dystonia syndrome during exposure to permanent magnetic field ].

Voprosy kurortologii, fizioterapii, i lechebnoi fizicheskoi kultury · 2001 · Benefit · Insufficient evidence

← Research stream
BenefitInsufficient evidencePaper 3901

A course of treatment using a permanent magnetic field (two magnetic discs, 60 mT) applied symmetrically over projections of great arteries was reported to restore vegetative homeostasis and normalize sympathicotony/vegetative regulation in hypertensive patie…

Study snapshot

PublicationVoprosy kurortologii, fizioterapii, i lechebnoi fizicheskoi kultury · 2001
Study typerandomized_trial
Reported directionBenefit
Evidence ratingInsufficient

Abstract

Permanent magnetic field was applied by placing two magnetic discs (induction 60 mT) in the projection of great arteries on both sides symmetrically. The treatment was given to hypertensive patients with vegetovascular asthenia. A course of such magnetic treatment affects pathogenetic mechanisms of vegetative disorders due to the ability of permanent magnetic field to restore vegetative homeostasis, normalize sympathicotony and vegetative regulation.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typerandomized_trial
Effect directionbenefit
PopulationHypertensive patients with vegetovascular asthenia (vegetovascular dystonia syndrome)
Sample sizeNot supplied
Exposurecourse of treatment (duration not specified)
Evidence strengthInsufficientConfidence: 62% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

A course of treatment using a permanent magnetic field (two magnetic discs, 60 mT) applied symmetrically over projections of great arteries was reported to restore vegetative homeostasis and normalize sympathicotony/vegetative regulation in hypertensive patients with vegetovascular asthenia.

Outcomes measured

  • autonomic status
  • vegetative homeostasis
  • sympathicotony
  • vegetative regulation

Limitations

  • No sample size reported in abstract.
  • No control/comparator details reported in abstract.
  • Outcome measures and quantitative results are not described in the abstract.
  • Treatment duration and follow-up are not specified.
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "randomized_trial",
  "exposure": {
    "band": null,
    "source": "permanent magnetic field (static magnets)",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": "course of treatment (duration not specified)"
  },
  "population": "Hypertensive patients with vegetovascular asthenia (vegetovascular dystonia syndrome)",
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "autonomic status",
    "vegetative homeostasis",
    "sympathicotony",
    "vegetative regulation"
  ],
  "main_findings": "A course of treatment using a permanent magnetic field (two magnetic discs, 60 mT) applied symmetrically over projections of great arteries was reported to restore vegetative homeostasis and normalize sympathicotony/vegetative regulation in hypertensive patients with vegetovascular asthenia.",
  "effect_direction": "benefit",
  "limitations": [
    "No sample size reported in abstract.",
    "No control/comparator details reported in abstract.",
    "Outcome measures and quantitative results are not described in the abstract.",
    "Treatment duration and follow-up are not specified."
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "insufficient",
  "confidence": 0.62,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "static magnetic field",
    "permanent magnetic field",
    "60 mT",
    "magnetic discs",
    "autonomic status",
    "vegetovascular dystonia",
    "vegetovascular asthenia",
    "hypertension",
    "sympathicotony"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "static-magnetic-fields",
      "weight": 0.9,
      "reason": "Intervention is a permanent (static) magnetic field using magnetic discs (60 mT)."
    },
    {
      "slug": "clinical-trials",
      "weight": 0.5,
      "reason": "Listed as a randomized controlled trial/clinical trial in metadata."
    }
  ]
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: Not supplied
PubMed: 11868527

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library