Assessment of the temporal trend of the exposure of people to electromagnetic fields produced by base stations for mobile telephones.

Radiation protection dosimetry · 2001 · Unclear · Insufficient evidence

← Research stream
UnclearInsufficient evidencePaper 3895

Monitoring of six-minute averaged electric field levels from base stations of different typologies (TACS, GSM, DCS) was performed. The mean six-minute averaged E-field measured between 10 a.m. and 1 p.m. corresponded to 84% of the maximum daily six-minute ave…

Study snapshot

PublicationRadiation protection dosimetry · 2001
Study typeexposure_assessment
Reported directionUnclear
Evidence ratingInsufficient

Abstract

Monitoring of electric field levels produced by base stations (BSs) for mobile telephones of different typologies (TACS. GSM, DCS) has been carried out. Results show that BSs can be classified as 'business' or 'residential'. The mean value of six minutes averaged E-field value measured between 10 a.m. and 1 p.m. corresponds to the 84% of the maximum daily six minutes averaged value. Comparison between electromagnetic field levels produced by BSs and their phone traffic data, supplied by companies, is shown. Finally, on an hourly average basis, a daily curve has been constructed of the exposure trend produced by such installations.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeexposure_assessment
Effect directionunclear
PopulationNot supplied
Sample sizeNot supplied
ExposureRF · six-minute averaged measurements; measurements reported between 10 a.m. and 1 p.m.; hourly averages used to construct daily curve
Evidence strengthInsufficientConfidence: 74% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

Monitoring of six-minute averaged electric field levels from base stations of different typologies (TACS, GSM, DCS) was performed. The mean six-minute averaged E-field measured between 10 a.m. and 1 p.m. corresponded to 84% of the maximum daily six-minute averaged value. A comparison between measured field levels and phone traffic data was presented, and an hourly-average daily exposure curve was constructed.

Outcomes measured

  • Electric field (E-field) levels from mobile telephone base stations
  • Temporal (daily) trend of exposure
  • Relationship between E-field levels and phone traffic data

Limitations

  • No quantitative E-field values reported in the abstract
  • No information on number of base stations/measurement sites or sampling strategy in the abstract
  • Population characteristics and proximity to base stations not described in the abstract
  • Frequencies and measurement instrumentation/method details not provided in the abstract
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "exposure_assessment",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "RF",
    "source": "base station",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": "six-minute averaged measurements; measurements reported between 10 a.m. and 1 p.m.; hourly averages used to construct daily curve"
  },
  "population": null,
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "Electric field (E-field) levels from mobile telephone base stations",
    "Temporal (daily) trend of exposure",
    "Relationship between E-field levels and phone traffic data"
  ],
  "main_findings": "Monitoring of six-minute averaged electric field levels from base stations of different typologies (TACS, GSM, DCS) was performed. The mean six-minute averaged E-field measured between 10 a.m. and 1 p.m. corresponded to 84% of the maximum daily six-minute averaged value. A comparison between measured field levels and phone traffic data was presented, and an hourly-average daily exposure curve was constructed.",
  "effect_direction": "unclear",
  "limitations": [
    "No quantitative E-field values reported in the abstract",
    "No information on number of base stations/measurement sites or sampling strategy in the abstract",
    "Population characteristics and proximity to base stations not described in the abstract",
    "Frequencies and measurement instrumentation/method details not provided in the abstract"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "insufficient",
  "confidence": 0.74,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "base stations",
    "mobile telephones",
    "TACS",
    "GSM",
    "DCS",
    "electric field",
    "six-minute average",
    "temporal trend",
    "phone traffic data",
    "exposure monitoring"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "occupational-exposure",
      "weight": 0.1,
      "reason": "Exposure monitoring is described, but no occupational setting is specified; included only weakly."
    }
  ]
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006694
PubMed: 11878425

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library