Static magnetic field with a strong magnetic field gradient (41.7 T/m) induces c-Jun expression in HL-60 cells.
← Research streamHL-60 cells exposed to 6 T (spatially inhomogeneous; magnetic field gradient 41.7 T/m) or 10 T (spatially homogeneous) static magnetic fields for 1–48 h showed no remarkable differences in c-Myc and c-Fos protein expression versus sham. c-Jun protein expressi…
Study snapshot
Abstract
We investigated the effects of 6- and 10-T static magnetic fields (SMFs) on the expression of protooncogenes using Western blot immunohybridization methods. We used a SMF exposure system, which can expose cells to a spatially inhomogeneous 6 T with a strong magnetic field (MF) gradient (41.7 T/m) and a spatially homogeneous 10 T of the highest magnetic flux density in this experiment. HL-60 cells exposed to either 6- or 10-T SMF for periods of 1 to 48 h did not exhibit remarkable differences in levels of c-Myc and c-Fos protein expression, as compared with sham-exposed cells. In contrast, c-Jun protein expression increased in HL-60 cells after exposure to 6-T SMF for 24, 36, 48, and 72 h. These results suggest that a homogeneous 10-T SMF does not alter the expression of the c-jun, c-fos, and c-myc protooncogenes. However, our observation that exposure to a strong MF gradient induced c-Jun expression suggests that a strong MF gradient may have significant biological effects, particularly regarding processes related to an elevation of c-jun gene expression.
AI evidence extraction
Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.
Main findings
HL-60 cells exposed to 6 T (spatially inhomogeneous; magnetic field gradient 41.7 T/m) or 10 T (spatially homogeneous) static magnetic fields for 1–48 h showed no remarkable differences in c-Myc and c-Fos protein expression versus sham. c-Jun protein expression increased after exposure to 6 T with a strong magnetic field gradient at 24, 36, 48, and 72 h, while a homogeneous 10 T field did not alter c-jun/c-fos/c-myc expression.
Outcomes measured
- c-Jun protein expression
- c-Fos protein expression
- c-Myc protein expression
Limitations
- Sample size not reported in abstract
- Only one cell line (HL-60) assessed
- Outcome limited to protooncogene protein expression measured by Western blot
- Exposure conditions differ (inhomogeneous 6 T with strong gradient vs homogeneous 10 T), complicating attribution to flux density vs gradient
- 72 h exposure mentioned for c-Jun but earlier exposure period described as 1–48 h
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "in_vitro",
"exposure": {
"band": "static",
"source": "laboratory static magnetic field exposure system",
"frequency_mhz": null,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": "1 to 48 h (with c-Jun increase reported after 24, 36, 48, and 72 h at 6 T)"
},
"population": "HL-60 cells",
"sample_size": null,
"outcomes": [
"c-Jun protein expression",
"c-Fos protein expression",
"c-Myc protein expression"
],
"main_findings": "HL-60 cells exposed to 6 T (spatially inhomogeneous; magnetic field gradient 41.7 T/m) or 10 T (spatially homogeneous) static magnetic fields for 1–48 h showed no remarkable differences in c-Myc and c-Fos protein expression versus sham. c-Jun protein expression increased after exposure to 6 T with a strong magnetic field gradient at 24, 36, 48, and 72 h, while a homogeneous 10 T field did not alter c-jun/c-fos/c-myc expression.",
"effect_direction": "mixed",
"limitations": [
"Sample size not reported in abstract",
"Only one cell line (HL-60) assessed",
"Outcome limited to protooncogene protein expression measured by Western blot",
"Exposure conditions differ (inhomogeneous 6 T with strong gradient vs homogeneous 10 T), complicating attribution to flux density vs gradient",
"72 h exposure mentioned for c-Jun but earlier exposure period described as 1–48 h"
],
"evidence_strength": "low",
"confidence": 0.78,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"static magnetic field",
"strong magnetic field gradient",
"41.7 T/m",
"6 T",
"10 T",
"HL-60",
"protooncogenes",
"c-Jun",
"c-Fos",
"c-Myc",
"Western blot"
],
"suggested_hubs": [
{
"slug": "static-magnetic-fields",
"weight": 0.9,
"reason": "Study examines biological effects of high-strength static magnetic fields and field gradients in vitro."
},
{
"slug": "in-vitro-studies",
"weight": 0.6,
"reason": "Cell culture experiment measuring protein expression changes after SMF exposure."
}
]
}AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.
Identifiers and source
DOI: 10.1290/1543-706x(2003)039<0348:smfwas>2.0.co;2
PubMed: 15038779
Related papers
- Neurobiological effects and mechanisms of magnetic fields: a review from 2000 to 2023 2024
- Static magnetic fields as a factor in modification of tissue and cell structure: a review 2024
- Impact of weak radiofrequency and static magnetic fields on key signaling molecules, intracellular pH, membrane potential, and cell growth in HT-1080 fibrosarcoma cells 2023
- Zebrafish Larval Melanophores Respond to Electromagnetic Fields Exposure 2023
- Exposure to a static magnetic field attenuates hepatic damage and function abnormality in obese and diabetic mice 2023
- Introducing energy into marine environments: A lab-scale static magnetic field submarine cable simulation and its effects on sperm and larval development on a reef forming serpulid 2023