[Radiofrequency treatment of cardiac arrhythmias at the Cardiology Center in Iaşi ].
← Research streamAmong 51 patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation procedures (57 ablations), the initial ablation was effective in 44/51 (86%). During 11–16 months follow-up, recurrence occurred in 7 patients (14%); after repeat procedures, ablation was effective in 48/51…
Study snapshot
Abstract
UNLABELLED: It is well known that the radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) treatment of cardiac arrhythmias is effective and devoid of significant complications. However, in our country, the experience of this technique is not so large and requires more clinical studies to validate it. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this was to present our experience in the RFCA of cardiac tachycardias. METHODS: Between July 2002 and February 2003, in Iaşi Cardiology Center, we performed a total of 79 diagnosis procedures. Of these 57 (72%) were radiofrequency ablation procedures at 51 patients, mean age 48 +/- 16 years (12-81), men majority 32 (63%). The electrophysiology diagnosis was: 22 (39%) common atrial flutter, 3 (5%) atrial tachycardias, 13 (23%) atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia, 12 (21%) Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, 4 (7%) orthodromic tachycardia using concealed accessory pathway, 2 (3%) ventricular tachycardias and 1 (2%) ablation of the atrioventricular junction. RESULTS: The initial ablation procedure was effective in 44/ 51 patients (86%), with a total duration of 130 +/- 42 min, using 24 +/- 10 min of radioscopy. During follow-up 13 +/- 1.3 (11-16 months), recurrence occurred in 7 patients 14%. In 7 of them a second effective procedure was performed in 4 patients. Finally, radiofrequency ablation was effective in 48/51 of patients (94%), improving the procedural success rate at 95% (54/57 patients). No complications occurred during follow-up. CONCLUSION: The treatment of cardiac arrhythmias by radiofrequency catheter ablation is effective and safe and is the only way to cure the supraventricular and ventricular tachyarrhythmias.
AI evidence extraction
Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.
Main findings
Among 51 patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation procedures (57 ablations), the initial ablation was effective in 44/51 (86%). During 11–16 months follow-up, recurrence occurred in 7 patients (14%); after repeat procedures, ablation was effective in 48/51 (94%) and procedural success was 54/57 (95%). No complications were reported during follow-up.
Outcomes measured
- Procedural effectiveness/success of radiofrequency catheter ablation
- Recurrence during follow-up
- Complications/safety
Limitations
- Single-center experience
- Non-randomized observational design
- Follow-up duration limited to 11–16 months
- Exposure parameters (e.g., frequency, power, SAR) not reported
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "cohort",
"exposure": {
"band": null,
"source": "radiofrequency catheter ablation (medical procedure)",
"frequency_mhz": null,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": null
},
"population": "Patients undergoing electrophysiology diagnosis and radiofrequency catheter ablation for tachyarrhythmias at the Iaşi Cardiology Center (July 2002–February 2003)",
"sample_size": 51,
"outcomes": [
"Procedural effectiveness/success of radiofrequency catheter ablation",
"Recurrence during follow-up",
"Complications/safety"
],
"main_findings": "Among 51 patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation procedures (57 ablations), the initial ablation was effective in 44/51 (86%). During 11–16 months follow-up, recurrence occurred in 7 patients (14%); after repeat procedures, ablation was effective in 48/51 (94%) and procedural success was 54/57 (95%). No complications were reported during follow-up.",
"effect_direction": "benefit",
"limitations": [
"Single-center experience",
"Non-randomized observational design",
"Follow-up duration limited to 11–16 months",
"Exposure parameters (e.g., frequency, power, SAR) not reported"
],
"evidence_strength": "low",
"confidence": 0.74,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"radiofrequency catheter ablation",
"cardiac arrhythmias",
"tachycardia",
"atrial flutter",
"AVNRT",
"Wolff-Parkinson-White",
"procedural success",
"recurrence",
"safety"
],
"suggested_hubs": [
{
"slug": "other",
"weight": 0.35,
"reason": "Clinical use of radiofrequency energy for catheter ablation; not an environmental EMF exposure study."
}
]
}AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.
Identifiers and source
DOI: Not supplied
PubMed: 15832970
Related papers
- Effects of anthropogenic electromagnetic fields used for subsurface oil and gas exploration 2024
- [Late effects of radiofrequency fulguration: report of five cases]. 1998
- Mechanism of ventricular rate control after radiofrequency modification of atrioventricular conduction in patients with atrial fibrillation. 1996
- [Management of nodal reentrant tachycardia with radiofrequency: predictive criteria of success]. 1995
- A comparative study of radiofrequency assisted versus microdebrider assisted turbinoplasty in cases of inferior turbinate hypertrophy. 2014
- Radiofrequency incision and lay open technique of pilonidal sinus (clinical practice paper on modified technique). 2003