Wireless sensor and data transmission needs and technologies for patient monitoring in the operating room and intensive care unit.

Conference proceedings : ... Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual Conference · 2005 · Unclear · Insufficient evidence

← Research stream
UnclearInsufficient evidencePaper 3545

The study identified key patient parameters to monitor and reviewed wireless techniques for short-range transmission in hospital settings. It reports that current hospital wireless techniques are based on WMTS and WLAN, that there are no viable solutions for …

Study snapshot

PublicationConference proceedings : ... Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual Conference · 2005
Study typeengineering
Reported directionUnclear
Evidence ratingInsufficient

Abstract

In the intensive care unit, or during anesthesia, patients are attached to monitors by cables. These cables obstruct nursing staff and hinder the patients from moving freely in the hospital. However, rapidly developing wireless technologies are expected to solve these problems. To this end, this study revealed problem areas in current patient monitoring and established the most important medical parameters to monitor. In addition, usable wireless techniques for short-range data transmission were explored and currently employed wireless applications in the hospital environment were studied. The most important parameters measured of the patient include blood pressures, electrocardiography, respiration rate, heart rate and temperature. Currently used wireless techniques in hospitals are based on the WMTS and WLAN standards. There are no viable solutions for short-range data transmission from patient sensors to patient monitors, but potentially usable techniques in the future are based on the WPAN standards. These techniques include Bluetooth, ZigBee and UWB. Other suitable techniques might be based on capacitive or inductive coupling. The establishing of wireless techniques depends on ensuring the reliability of data transmission, eliminating disturbance by other wireless devices, ensuring patient data security and patient safety, and lowering the power consumption and price.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeengineering
Effect directionunclear
PopulationNot supplied
Sample sizeNot supplied
ExposureNot supplied
Evidence strengthInsufficientConfidence: 74% · Peer reviewed: unknown

Main findings

The study identified key patient parameters to monitor and reviewed wireless techniques for short-range transmission in hospital settings. It reports that current hospital wireless techniques are based on WMTS and WLAN, that there are no viable solutions for short-range transmission from patient sensors to monitors at present, and that potential future options include WPAN technologies (Bluetooth, ZigBee, UWB) and possibly capacitive or inductive coupling.

Outcomes measured

  • Identification of key medical parameters for monitoring (blood pressure, ECG, respiration rate, heart rate, temperature)
  • Assessment of wireless technologies/standards for short-range data transmission in hospital environments (WMTS, WLAN, WPAN: Bluetooth, ZigBee, UWB; capacitive/inductive coupling)
  • Considerations for implementation: reliability, interference, data security, patient safety, power consumption, cost

Limitations

  • Conference proceeding format; methods and evaluation details are not provided in the abstract
  • No quantitative exposure characterization (e.g., frequencies, power levels, SAR) reported
  • No health effects or clinical outcome evaluation described
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "engineering",
  "exposure": {
    "band": null,
    "source": "hospital wireless patient monitoring (WMTS/WLAN/WPAN)",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": null,
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "Identification of key medical parameters for monitoring (blood pressure, ECG, respiration rate, heart rate, temperature)",
    "Assessment of wireless technologies/standards for short-range data transmission in hospital environments (WMTS, WLAN, WPAN: Bluetooth, ZigBee, UWB; capacitive/inductive coupling)",
    "Considerations for implementation: reliability, interference, data security, patient safety, power consumption, cost"
  ],
  "main_findings": "The study identified key patient parameters to monitor and reviewed wireless techniques for short-range transmission in hospital settings. It reports that current hospital wireless techniques are based on WMTS and WLAN, that there are no viable solutions for short-range transmission from patient sensors to monitors at present, and that potential future options include WPAN technologies (Bluetooth, ZigBee, UWB) and possibly capacitive or inductive coupling.",
  "effect_direction": "unclear",
  "limitations": [
    "Conference proceeding format; methods and evaluation details are not provided in the abstract",
    "No quantitative exposure characterization (e.g., frequencies, power levels, SAR) reported",
    "No health effects or clinical outcome evaluation described"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "insufficient",
  "confidence": 0.74,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "unknown",
  "keywords": [
    "patient monitoring",
    "intensive care unit",
    "operating room",
    "wireless data transmission",
    "WMTS",
    "WLAN",
    "WPAN",
    "Bluetooth",
    "ZigBee",
    "UWB",
    "interference",
    "data security",
    "patient safety"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "school-wi-fi",
      "weight": 0,
      "reason": null
    }
  ]
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1109/iembs.2005.1615645
PubMed: 17281415

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library