RF Safe

Bone structure regeneration after low induction magnetic field treatment in teeth chosen for extraction.

Advances in medical sciences · 2006 · Benefit · Very low evidence

← Research stream
BenefitVery low evidencePaper 3491

Radiographs at 2 weeks and 2 months showed increased bone structure concentration consistent with bone regeneration. Follow-up radiographs at 6 months, 2 years, and 3 years reportedly showed preservation of this bone structure concentration; authors conclude …

Study snapshot

PublicationAdvances in medical sciences · 2006
Study typeother
Reported directionBenefit
Evidence ratingVery low

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the work was to use and to evaluate the usefulness of the slow variable magnetic fields to aid the treatment of the teeth chosen for extraction. The marginal paradontium of periapical bone of teeth was in a state of extensive destruction. The teeth were chosen for extraction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 13 patients were chosen. 10 of them had with endo-perio changes and 3 suffered from full tooth luxation and had the teeth replanted. Those people were to have an extraction procedure or were declared as impossible to treat in other dental offices. Patients underwent non-aggressive skaling, endodontic treatment and were exposed to slow variable magnetic fields generated by Viofor JPS, accordingly to methods and parameters suggested by Department of Propaedeutics in Dentistry of Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin. The process of healing of changes was evaluated radiologically. RESULTS: RTG done after 2 weeks and after 2 months were evaluated in respect of bone regeneration. They show the bone structure concentration. A RTG evaluation after half a year, two and three years show a preservation of the bone structure concentration. CONCLUSIONS: The use of slow variable magnetic fields contributed to bone structure regeneration and to preserve teeth with recorded endo-perio syndrome. Endodontic treatment of replanted teeth, aided with magnetostimulation has stopped the osteolisis process.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeother
Effect directionbenefit
PopulationDental patients with teeth chosen for extraction (endo-perio changes or replanted luxated teeth)
Sample size13
ExposureNot supplied
Evidence strengthVery lowConfidence: 72% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

Radiographs at 2 weeks and 2 months showed increased bone structure concentration consistent with bone regeneration. Follow-up radiographs at 6 months, 2 years, and 3 years reportedly showed preservation of this bone structure concentration; authors conclude magnetostimulation contributed to regeneration and stopped osteolysis in replanted teeth.

Outcomes measured

  • Radiologic evidence of periapical/marginal bone regeneration (bone structure concentration)
  • Preservation of bone structure concentration over follow-up
  • Osteolysis process (stopping)
  • Tooth preservation (avoid extraction)

Limitations

  • No control/comparator group described in abstract
  • Small sample size (n=13)
  • Exposure parameters (field strength, frequency, session duration/number) not reported in abstract
  • Co-interventions present (scaling and endodontic treatment), making attribution to magnetic fields unclear
  • Outcome assessment described only as radiologic evaluation; blinding and standardized measures not described
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "other",
  "exposure": {
    "band": null,
    "source": "magnetostimulation device (Viofor JPS)",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": "Dental patients with teeth chosen for extraction (endo-perio changes or replanted luxated teeth)",
  "sample_size": 13,
  "outcomes": [
    "Radiologic evidence of periapical/marginal bone regeneration (bone structure concentration)",
    "Preservation of bone structure concentration over follow-up",
    "Osteolysis process (stopping)",
    "Tooth preservation (avoid extraction)"
  ],
  "main_findings": "Radiographs at 2 weeks and 2 months showed increased bone structure concentration consistent with bone regeneration. Follow-up radiographs at 6 months, 2 years, and 3 years reportedly showed preservation of this bone structure concentration; authors conclude magnetostimulation contributed to regeneration and stopped osteolysis in replanted teeth.",
  "effect_direction": "benefit",
  "limitations": [
    "No control/comparator group described in abstract",
    "Small sample size (n=13)",
    "Exposure parameters (field strength, frequency, session duration/number) not reported in abstract",
    "Co-interventions present (scaling and endodontic treatment), making attribution to magnetic fields unclear",
    "Outcome assessment described only as radiologic evaluation; blinding and standardized measures not described"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "very_low",
  "confidence": 0.72,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "slow variable magnetic fields",
    "magnetostimulation",
    "Viofor JPS",
    "dental",
    "endo-perio",
    "tooth replantation",
    "bone regeneration",
    "osteolysis",
    "radiography"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "other",
      "weight": 0.2,
      "reason": "Clinical use of low/slow variable magnetic fields for therapeutic purposes; no clear RF/5G/Wi-Fi/occupational/policy focus stated."
    }
  ]
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: Not supplied
PubMed: 17458080

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library