Numerical evaluation of radio frequency power deposition in human models during MRI.

Conference proceedings : ... Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual Conference · 2006 · Unclear · Insufficient evidence

← Research stream
UnclearInsufficient evidencePaper 3481

Numerical simulations evaluated RF power deposition for a 27-week fetus in a simplified maternal model and for a realistic human torso model with an in situ pacemaker and leads, with additional organ dosimetry for a realistic torso model. Simulations assessed…

Study snapshot

PublicationConference proceedings : ... Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual Conference · 2006
Study typeengineering
Reported directionUnclear
Evidence ratingInsufficient

Abstract

Concerns have been expressed about safety of MRI examination of two groups of people, namely pregnant mothers and cardiac pacemaker bearers. The main uncertainty relates to excessive heating by pulsed radio frequency (RF) fields. To address these issues, numerical evaluations of the power deposition are performed for a 27-week old fetus in a simplified model of the mother, and a realistic model of a human torso with an in situ pacemaker including its leads. The evaluations are supplemented with organ dosimetry for a realistic model of the human torso. An ideal non-resonant and two resonant birdcage coils operating at 64 MHz (corresponding to 1.5 T MRI) are evaluated. All simulations are performed with the finite difference time domain (FDTD) method.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeengineering
Effect directionunclear
PopulationPregnant mothers (27-week fetus model) and cardiac pacemaker bearers (human torso model with in situ pacemaker and leads)
Sample sizeNot supplied
ExposureRF · 64 MHz
Evidence strengthInsufficientConfidence: 74% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

Numerical simulations evaluated RF power deposition for a 27-week fetus in a simplified maternal model and for a realistic human torso model with an in situ pacemaker and leads, with additional organ dosimetry for a realistic torso model. Simulations assessed an ideal non-resonant and two resonant birdcage coils operating at 64 MHz (1.5 T MRI) using the FDTD method.

Outcomes measured

  • Numerical evaluation of RF power deposition
  • Organ dosimetry
  • Excessive heating concern (context)

Limitations

  • No quantitative results (e.g., SAR, temperature rise) reported in the abstract
  • Model-based numerical evaluation; real-world exposure conditions and validation not described in the abstract
  • Sample size not applicable/unspecified
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "engineering",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "RF",
    "source": "MRI",
    "frequency_mhz": 64,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": "Pregnant mothers (27-week fetus model) and cardiac pacemaker bearers (human torso model with in situ pacemaker and leads)",
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "Numerical evaluation of RF power deposition",
    "Organ dosimetry",
    "Excessive heating concern (context)"
  ],
  "main_findings": "Numerical simulations evaluated RF power deposition for a 27-week fetus in a simplified maternal model and for a realistic human torso model with an in situ pacemaker and leads, with additional organ dosimetry for a realistic torso model. Simulations assessed an ideal non-resonant and two resonant birdcage coils operating at 64 MHz (1.5 T MRI) using the FDTD method.",
  "effect_direction": "unclear",
  "limitations": [
    "No quantitative results (e.g., SAR, temperature rise) reported in the abstract",
    "Model-based numerical evaluation; real-world exposure conditions and validation not described in the abstract",
    "Sample size not applicable/unspecified"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "insufficient",
  "confidence": 0.74,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "MRI",
    "radio frequency",
    "power deposition",
    "heating",
    "pregnancy",
    "fetus",
    "pacemaker",
    "birdcage coil",
    "64 MHz",
    "1.5 T",
    "FDTD",
    "organ dosimetry"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "occupational-exposure",
      "weight": 0.2,
      "reason": "MRI-related RF exposure assessment may be relevant to clinical/technical settings, but the abstract focuses on patients rather than workers."
    }
  ]
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1109/iembs.2006.259880
PubMed: 17945576

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library