Finite element modeling of electric field effects of TASER devices on nerve and muscle.

Conference proceedings : ... Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual Conference · 2006 · No effect · Low evidence

← Research stream
No effectLow evidencePaper 3467

Finite element analyses under worst-case assumptions predicted muscle-layer current density and electric field strength of 94 mA/cm^2 and 47 V/cm. These values were above thresholds for neuromuscular activation but below levels needed for permanent cellular e…

Study snapshot

PublicationConference proceedings : ... Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual Conference · 2006
Study typeengineering
Reported directionNo effect
Evidence ratingLow

Abstract

TASERs deliver electrical pulses that can temporarily incapacitate subjects. The goal of this paper is to analyze the distribution of currents in muscle layers and understand the electro-muscular incapacitation safety and efficacy of TASERs. The analyses describe skeletal muscle and motor nerve activation, cell electroporation and current and electric field distributions through skin, fat and muscle layers, under worst-case assumptions for TASER electrode penetration and separation. For the muscle layer, the analysis predicts worst-case current-density and field-strength values of 94 mA/cm(2) and 47 V/cm. Both values are higher than thresholds required for neuromuscular activation but significantly lower than levels needed for permanent cellular electroporation or tissue damage. The results indicate that TASERs are safe and effective in producing temporary subject incapacitation.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeengineering
Effect directionno_effect
PopulationNot supplied
Sample sizeNot supplied
ExposureNot supplied
Evidence strengthLowConfidence: 74% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

Finite element analyses under worst-case assumptions predicted muscle-layer current density and electric field strength of 94 mA/cm^2 and 47 V/cm. These values were above thresholds for neuromuscular activation but below levels needed for permanent cellular electroporation or tissue damage; the authors conclude TASERs are safe and effective for temporary incapacitation.

Outcomes measured

  • current distribution in muscle layers
  • skeletal muscle activation
  • motor nerve activation
  • cell electroporation thresholds
  • current density
  • electric field strength
  • safety (tissue damage risk)
  • efficacy (temporary incapacitation)

Limitations

  • Modeling/analysis study (finite element), not direct measurements in humans or animals
  • Assumes worst-case electrode penetration and separation; real-world conditions may differ
  • Threshold comparisons are referenced but specific sources/uncertainties are not detailed in the abstract
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "engineering",
  "exposure": {
    "band": null,
    "source": "TASER device",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": null,
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "current distribution in muscle layers",
    "skeletal muscle activation",
    "motor nerve activation",
    "cell electroporation thresholds",
    "current density",
    "electric field strength",
    "safety (tissue damage risk)",
    "efficacy (temporary incapacitation)"
  ],
  "main_findings": "Finite element analyses under worst-case assumptions predicted muscle-layer current density and electric field strength of 94 mA/cm^2 and 47 V/cm. These values were above thresholds for neuromuscular activation but below levels needed for permanent cellular electroporation or tissue damage; the authors conclude TASERs are safe and effective for temporary incapacitation.",
  "effect_direction": "no_effect",
  "limitations": [
    "Modeling/analysis study (finite element), not direct measurements in humans or animals",
    "Assumes worst-case electrode penetration and separation; real-world conditions may differ",
    "Threshold comparisons are referenced but specific sources/uncertainties are not detailed in the abstract"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "low",
  "confidence": 0.74,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "TASER",
    "finite element modeling",
    "electric field",
    "current density",
    "skeletal muscle",
    "motor nerve",
    "neuromuscular activation",
    "electroporation",
    "tissue damage",
    "safety",
    "efficacy"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "engineering-modeling",
      "weight": 0.9,
      "reason": "Finite element modeling of electric field/current distributions in tissue."
    },
    {
      "slug": "occupational-exposure",
      "weight": 0.25,
      "reason": "TASER exposure may be relevant to law-enforcement/occupational contexts, though not explicitly studied in a population."
    }
  ]
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1109/iembs.2006.260376
PubMed: 17946454

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library