Histologic evaluation of thermal capsulorrhaphy of human shoulder joint capsule with monopolar radiofrequency energy during short- to long-term follow-up.

Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association · 2008 · Mixed · Low evidence

← Research stream
MixedLow evidencePaper 3435

No significant differences were reported for intact synovial layer, subsynovial edema, collagen morphology, and inflammatory cells between controls and mid-/long-term mRFE groups. The short-term mRFE group showed increased cellularity and vascularity versus m…

Study snapshot

PublicationArthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association · 2008
Study typecase_control
Reported directionMixed
Evidence ratingLow

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the histologic morphology of human shoulder joint capsule after thermal capsulorrhaphy with monopolar radiofrequency energy (mRFE) during short- to long-term follow-up. METHODS: This study comprised 27 patients who received an arthroscopic mRFE thermal capsulorrhaphy and 10 patients without mRFE treatment serving as the control group. Biopsy samples from 3 locations (anterior-superior, anterior-inferior, and posterior-medial) of the shoulder joint capsule were harvested from both the mRFE-treated patients and the control patients. The follow-up time for the mRFE treatment ranged from 3.5 to 62 months, which was divided into 3 groups: short, 3.5 to 12 months; medium, 14 to 25 months; and long, 31 to 62 months. The biopsy samples were analyzed via a histologic scoring system, evaluating an intact synovial layer, subsynovial edema, collagen morphology, cellularity, vascularity, and inflammatory cells. Histologic scores among each follow-up group were compared with each other and with those in the control group. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the histologic categories of intact synovial layer, subsynovial edema, collagen morphology, and inflammatory cells among the control and mid- and long-term mRFE groups. The short-term mRFE group had greater increased cellularity and vascularity compared with the mid- and long-term groups, which progressively improved toward the appearance in the normal control group with time. CONCLUSIONS: After mRFE capsulorrhaphy, histologic analysis revealed that the mRFE-treated shoulder joint capsule had almost returned to normal, except for persistent cellularity and increased vascularity, which were present at up to 5 years after this procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic case-control study.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typecase_control
Effect directionmixed
PopulationHuman patients undergoing shoulder joint capsule biopsy after arthroscopic mRFE thermal capsulorrhaphy; controls without mRFE treatment
Sample size37
Exposurefollow-up 3.5 to 62 months (short 3.5–12; medium 14–25; long 31–62 months)
Evidence strengthLowConfidence: 78% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

No significant differences were reported for intact synovial layer, subsynovial edema, collagen morphology, and inflammatory cells between controls and mid-/long-term mRFE groups. The short-term mRFE group showed increased cellularity and vascularity versus mid-/long-term groups, with progressive improvement toward control appearance over time; conclusions note persistent cellularity and increased vascularity up to 5 years.

Outcomes measured

  • Histologic morphology/scoring of shoulder joint capsule (intact synovial layer, subsynovial edema, collagen morphology, cellularity, vascularity, inflammatory cells)

Limitations

  • Radiofrequency exposure parameters (e.g., frequency, power, SAR) not reported in abstract
  • Therapeutic case-control design (Level III)
  • Histologic outcomes only; clinical outcomes not described in abstract
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "case_control",
  "exposure": {
    "band": null,
    "source": "monopolar radiofrequency energy (mRFE) used for arthroscopic thermal capsulorrhaphy",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": "follow-up 3.5 to 62 months (short 3.5–12; medium 14–25; long 31–62 months)"
  },
  "population": "Human patients undergoing shoulder joint capsule biopsy after arthroscopic mRFE thermal capsulorrhaphy; controls without mRFE treatment",
  "sample_size": 37,
  "outcomes": [
    "Histologic morphology/scoring of shoulder joint capsule (intact synovial layer, subsynovial edema, collagen morphology, cellularity, vascularity, inflammatory cells)"
  ],
  "main_findings": "No significant differences were reported for intact synovial layer, subsynovial edema, collagen morphology, and inflammatory cells between controls and mid-/long-term mRFE groups. The short-term mRFE group showed increased cellularity and vascularity versus mid-/long-term groups, with progressive improvement toward control appearance over time; conclusions note persistent cellularity and increased vascularity up to 5 years.",
  "effect_direction": "mixed",
  "limitations": [
    "Radiofrequency exposure parameters (e.g., frequency, power, SAR) not reported in abstract",
    "Therapeutic case-control design (Level III)",
    "Histologic outcomes only; clinical outcomes not described in abstract"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "low",
  "confidence": 0.78,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "monopolar radiofrequency energy",
    "thermal capsulorrhaphy",
    "shoulder joint capsule",
    "histology",
    "cellularity",
    "vascularity",
    "follow-up"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "other",
      "weight": 0.2,
      "reason": "Medical/surgical therapeutic use of radiofrequency energy rather than environmental/consumer EMF exposure"
    }
  ]
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.08.004
PubMed: 18237705

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library