Effect of DECT cordless phone radiation on exposed, laboratory cultivated upland cotton plants

2017 · Harm · Low evidence

← Research stream
HarmLow evidencePaper 2366

After 21 days exposure to 1882 MHz radiation from a DECT cordless phone base unit, exposed cotton plants showed lower above-ground and root biomass, reduced photosynthetic pigments, and severe chloroplast structural damage compared with matched controls.

Study snapshot

Publicationmanual · 2017
Study typeanimal
Reported directionHarm
Evidence ratingLow

Abstract

Effect of DECT cordless phone radiation on exposed, laboratory cultivated upland cotton plants Stefi AL, Margaritis LH, Christodoulakis NS. The effect of the non ionizing radiation on exposed, laboratory cultivated upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) plants. Flora: Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants [Internet]. 2017;226:55 - 64. Abstract A series of experiments was carried out to investigate possible structural or biochemical alterations in Gossypium hirsutum plants after a long term (21 days) exposure to non ionizing radiation (1882 MHz) emitted from the base unit of a cordless DECT system. Exposed plants, compared to the negative (matched) controls, seem to be seriously affected. Notably lower biomass production for the above ground part and the root was recorded. Reduction of the photosynthetic pigments and severe damage of the chloroplast structure were also observed. It seems that non ionizing radiation can be noxious for plant life functions. scopus.com 84997817372&doi=10.1016%2fj.flora.2016.11.009&origin=inward&txGid=2a0c5f11e55ffcd3b656cd415c1041ac Excerpt [same exposure setup as the maize study] The effect of the non-ionizing radiation at the microwave band, on the Gossypium hirsutum young plants, after a long termexposure, can be considered as significant. The disastrous effect on chloroplast structure, the reduction of the photosynthetic pigments and the suppression of the photosynthetic potential, are the main causes for the significant reduction of the primary productivity. Moreover, a serious effect on the underground part of the plant was recorded but this cannot be evaluated yet.

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeanimal
Effect directionharm
PopulationLaboratory cultivated upland cotton plants (Gossypium hirsutum L.)
Sample sizeNot supplied
Exposuremicrowave · 1882 MHz · 21 days
Evidence strengthLowConfidence: 74% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

After 21 days exposure to 1882 MHz radiation from a DECT cordless phone base unit, exposed cotton plants showed lower above-ground and root biomass, reduced photosynthetic pigments, and severe chloroplast structural damage compared with matched controls.

Outcomes measured

  • Biomass production (above-ground and root)
  • Photosynthetic pigments
  • Chloroplast structure
  • Photosynthetic potential/primary productivity

Limitations

  • Sample size not reported in provided text
  • Exposure intensity/SAR not reported in provided text
  • Details of experimental design and statistical analysis not provided in provided text
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "study_type": "animal",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "microwave",
    "source": "DECT cordless phone base unit",
    "frequency_mhz": 1882,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": "21 days"
  },
  "population": "Laboratory cultivated upland cotton plants (Gossypium hirsutum L.)",
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "Biomass production (above-ground and root)",
    "Photosynthetic pigments",
    "Chloroplast structure",
    "Photosynthetic potential/primary productivity"
  ],
  "main_findings": "After 21 days exposure to 1882 MHz radiation from a DECT cordless phone base unit, exposed cotton plants showed lower above-ground and root biomass, reduced photosynthetic pigments, and severe chloroplast structural damage compared with matched controls.",
  "effect_direction": "harm",
  "limitations": [
    "Sample size not reported in provided text",
    "Exposure intensity/SAR not reported in provided text",
    "Details of experimental design and statistical analysis not provided in provided text"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "low",
  "confidence": 0.74,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "DECT",
    "cordless phone",
    "1882 MHz",
    "non-ionizing radiation",
    "microwave",
    "Gossypium hirsutum",
    "cotton",
    "plants",
    "chloroplast",
    "photosynthetic pigments",
    "biomass"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": []
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: Not supplied
PubMed: Not supplied

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library