Effect of different intensities of static magnetic field on stress & reproduction in Zebrafish
← Research streamAcute (1 week) and subacute (3 weeks) exposure to static magnetic fields of 2.5, 5, and 7.5 mT was associated with significant changes in cortisol, glucose, 17β-estradiol, and 17-α hydroxy progesterone levels, with effects increasing with field intensity and …
Study snapshot
Abstract
Effect of different intensities of static magnetic field on stress & reproduction in Zebrafish Sedigh E, Heidari B, Roozati A, Valipour A. The effect of different intensities of static magnetic field on stress and selected reproductive indices of the Zebrafish (Danio rerio) during acute and subacute exposure. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2019 Jan 9. doi: 10.1007/s00128-018-02538-1. Abstract The application of equipment and tools that produce a magnetic field is increasing in aquatic ecosystems. In the present study, the effects of acute (1 week) and subacute (3 weeks) exposures to different static magnetic fields (SMFs) of 2.5, 5, 7.5 mT on stress indices (cortisol and glucose), sex steroid hormones (17β-estradiol and 17-α hydroxy progesterone) and fecundity of the zebrafish (Danio rerio) were investigated. The obtained results showed a significant change in cortisol, glucose, 17β-estradiol (E2) and 17-α hydroxy progesterone (17-OHP) levels by enhancing the intensity and time of exposure to SMFs. In conclusion, the SMFs, especially at higher levels of intensities, showed physiologically harmful effects on the reproductive biology of the zebrafish during acute and subacute exposure. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
AI evidence extraction
Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.
Main findings
Acute (1 week) and subacute (3 weeks) exposure to static magnetic fields of 2.5, 5, and 7.5 mT was associated with significant changes in cortisol, glucose, 17β-estradiol, and 17-α hydroxy progesterone levels, with effects increasing with field intensity and exposure time. The authors conclude that higher-intensity SMFs showed physiologically harmful effects on zebrafish reproductive biology during these exposures.
Outcomes measured
- cortisol
- glucose
- 17β-estradiol (E2)
- 17-α hydroxy progesterone (17-OHP)
- fecundity
- stress indices
- sex steroid hormones
- selected reproductive indices
Limitations
- Sample size not reported in abstract
- Details of exposure setup and controls not described in abstract
- Fecundity results not quantified in abstract
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "animal",
"exposure": {
"band": "static",
"source": null,
"frequency_mhz": null,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": "acute (1 week) and subacute (3 weeks)"
},
"population": "Zebrafish (Danio rerio)",
"sample_size": null,
"outcomes": [
"cortisol",
"glucose",
"17β-estradiol (E2)",
"17-α hydroxy progesterone (17-OHP)",
"fecundity",
"stress indices",
"sex steroid hormones",
"selected reproductive indices"
],
"main_findings": "Acute (1 week) and subacute (3 weeks) exposure to static magnetic fields of 2.5, 5, and 7.5 mT was associated with significant changes in cortisol, glucose, 17β-estradiol, and 17-α hydroxy progesterone levels, with effects increasing with field intensity and exposure time. The authors conclude that higher-intensity SMFs showed physiologically harmful effects on zebrafish reproductive biology during these exposures.",
"effect_direction": "harm",
"limitations": [
"Sample size not reported in abstract",
"Details of exposure setup and controls not described in abstract",
"Fecundity results not quantified in abstract"
],
"evidence_strength": "low",
"confidence": 0.78,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
"keywords": [
"static magnetic field",
"SMF",
"mT",
"zebrafish",
"Danio rerio",
"stress",
"cortisol",
"glucose",
"reproduction",
"fecundity",
"estradiol",
"progesterone",
"acute exposure",
"subacute exposure"
],
"suggested_hubs": [
{
"slug": "occupational-exposure",
"weight": 0.2,
"reason": "Mentions increasing use of equipment/tools producing magnetic fields; study evaluates biological effects of static magnetic fields (though in an aquatic animal model)."
}
]
}AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.
Identifiers and source
DOI: 10.1007/s00128-018-02538-1
PubMed: Not supplied
Related papers
- Zebrafish Larval Melanophores Respond to Electromagnetic Fields Exposure 2023
- Static magnetic fields as a factor in modification of tissue and cell structure: a review 2024
- Exposure to a static magnetic field attenuates hepatic damage and function abnormality in obese and diabetic mice 2023
- Static magnetic fields from earphones: Detailed measurements plus some open questions 2022
- Complex Electromagnetic Issues Associated with the Use of Electric Vehicles in Urban Transportation 2022
- Distinct fatty acid redistribution and textural changes in the brain tissue upon the static magnetic field exposure 2022