Analysis of biological effects of cell phone radiation on human body using specific absorption rate and thermoregulatory response

2019 · Mixed · Low evidence

← Research stream
MixedLow evidencePaper 1807

Using an ANSYS 3D human body model across 850 MHz, 900 MHz, 2.1 GHz, 2.6 GHz, and 5.1 GHz, the study reports higher average SAR at higher frequencies and higher radiated power, and lower SAR with increased antenna-to-head distance. The authors report that at …

Study snapshot

Publicationmanual · 2019
Study typeengineering
Reported directionMixed
Evidence ratingLow

Abstract

Analysis of biological effects of cell phone radiation on human body using specific absorption rate and thermoregulatory response Tanghid B. Rashid TB, Song HH. Analysis of biological effects of cell phone radiation on human body using specific absorption rate and thermoregulatory response. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters. 61(6):1482- 1490. 2019. doi.org Abstract Health and science have reached a point of intersection which has never existed before. With the recent rapid increase in the use of cellular phones and long periods of usage of these devices near the human body, public concern regarding potential health hazards due to absorption of electromagnetic energy has been growing. To address these issues, this research evaluates the average Specific Absorption Rate in different human tissues by varying source to antenna distance and radiated power using the ANSYS 3D human body model. The Pennes bioheat transfer equation was solved analytically to calculate the longtime exposure effect and temperature rise. The results show that regardless of the frequency, if the antenna radiated power is low (less than 125 mW), temperature increase within the human tissues is low; however if the antenna operates at high radiated power (1 W), temperature tends to increase eight and a half times. Excerpts The simulation was performed for five different frequencies (850 MHz, 900 MHz, 2.1 GHz, 2.6 GHz, and 5.1 GHz). To obtain the average SAR values on different scenarios, at each frequency antenna radiated power were varied four different times (0.125 W, 1 W, 1.5 W, and 2 W) and head to antenna distance varied three different times (0 mm, 10 mm, and 20 mm). In head tissues, at higher frequencies (2.1 GHz, 2.6 GHz, and 5.1 GHz) at 125 mW radiated and when there is no distance between head and antenna, average SAR values are higher in all tissues except fat tissues as shown in Table 3-5. Maximum average SAR values are found in CSF, dura, brain, skin, and bone tissues at 5.1 GHz frequency, which are 11.4 W/kg, 10.89 W/kg, 10.77 W/kg, 10.51 W/kg, and 9.3 W/kg, respectively, as shown in Table 4. Average SAR values are high at higher frequencies because tissues have relatively high conductively. In high frequency at high radiated power of 1 W, average SAR values in all tissues are very high. The maximum average SAR value found in CSF tissue was 91.2 W/kg. This means if the antenna is operating at a high power level, there is a high chance of tissues being affected. The above discussion proves that there is an inversely proportional relationship between SAR and the distance between the body model and the excitation source. For instance, increasing the distance between the source and the head model from 0 mm to 10 mm causes the SAR to decrease by approximately three times at lower frequency, and it decreases approximately five and a half times at higher frequency. The research concludes, for the long time exposure, and even for the worst possible radiated power level, the temperature rise caused in the human tissues is not close to the dangerous [thermal] limit [42 degrees centigrade]. onlinelibrary.wiley.com

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeengineering
Effect directionmixed
PopulationANSYS 3D human body model (simulated human tissues)
Sample sizeNot supplied
ExposureRF · long time exposure (modeled)
Evidence strengthLowConfidence: 78% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

Using an ANSYS 3D human body model across 850 MHz, 900 MHz, 2.1 GHz, 2.6 GHz, and 5.1 GHz, the study reports higher average SAR at higher frequencies and higher radiated power, and lower SAR with increased antenna-to-head distance. The authors report that at low radiated power (<125 mW) temperature increase in tissues is low, while at 1 W radiated power temperature tends to increase about 8.5 times. The paper concludes that even for long-time exposure at the worst modeled radiated power, the temperature rise is not close to a dangerous thermal limit (42°C).

Outcomes measured

  • Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) in different tissues
  • Modeled temperature rise / thermoregulatory response (Pennes bioheat equation)
  • Effect of antenna-to-body distance on SAR
  • Effect of radiated power on SAR and temperature rise

Limitations

  • Simulation/modeling study using an ANSYS human body model rather than measurements in people
  • Thermal effects inferred from analytical solution of the Pennes bioheat equation; real-world physiology and usage patterns may differ
  • Exposure scenarios limited to selected frequencies, radiated powers, and source-to-head distances
  • Focus appears primarily on thermal outcomes; non-thermal endpoints are not described in the provided abstract/excerpts
View raw extracted JSON
{
  "publication_year": 2019,
  "study_type": "engineering",
  "exposure": {
    "band": "RF",
    "source": "cell phone",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": "long time exposure (modeled)"
  },
  "population": "ANSYS 3D human body model (simulated human tissues)",
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) in different tissues",
    "Modeled temperature rise / thermoregulatory response (Pennes bioheat equation)",
    "Effect of antenna-to-body distance on SAR",
    "Effect of radiated power on SAR and temperature rise"
  ],
  "main_findings": "Using an ANSYS 3D human body model across 850 MHz, 900 MHz, 2.1 GHz, 2.6 GHz, and 5.1 GHz, the study reports higher average SAR at higher frequencies and higher radiated power, and lower SAR with increased antenna-to-head distance. The authors report that at low radiated power (<125 mW) temperature increase in tissues is low, while at 1 W radiated power temperature tends to increase about 8.5 times. The paper concludes that even for long-time exposure at the worst modeled radiated power, the temperature rise is not close to a dangerous thermal limit (42°C).",
  "effect_direction": "mixed",
  "limitations": [
    "Simulation/modeling study using an ANSYS human body model rather than measurements in people",
    "Thermal effects inferred from analytical solution of the Pennes bioheat equation; real-world physiology and usage patterns may differ",
    "Exposure scenarios limited to selected frequencies, radiated powers, and source-to-head distances",
    "Focus appears primarily on thermal outcomes; non-thermal endpoints are not described in the provided abstract/excerpts"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "low",
  "confidence": 0.78,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "stance": "neutral",
  "stance_confidence": 0.66,
  "summary": "This engineering simulation study modeled RF exposure from a cell-phone-like antenna using an ANSYS 3D human body model and calculated SAR and temperature rise via the Pennes bioheat equation. It reports that SAR increases with higher frequency and higher radiated power, and decreases as the antenna is moved farther from the head. The authors conclude that modeled long-time exposure does not raise tissue temperature near a dangerous thermal limit, even under worst-case radiated power assumptions.",
  "key_points": [
    "The study modeled exposure at 850, 900, 2100, 2600, and 5100 MHz with varying radiated power and antenna-to-head distance.",
    "Average SAR was reported to be higher at higher frequencies in most head tissues under the modeled conditions.",
    "Higher radiated power produced much higher SAR values, with a reported maximum average SAR in CSF at 1 W radiated power.",
    "Increasing source-to-head distance reduced SAR substantially, with larger reductions reported at higher frequencies.",
    "At low radiated power (<125 mW), the modeled temperature increase in tissues was reported to be low.",
    "At 1 W radiated power, the modeled temperature rise was reported to increase by about 8.5 times compared with low power.",
    "The paper concludes modeled temperature rise remains below a cited dangerous thermal limit (42°C) even for long-time exposure."
  ],
  "categories": [
    "RF Exposure Modeling",
    "Dosimetry (SAR)",
    "Thermal Effects"
  ],
  "tags": [
    "Cell Phone Radiation",
    "Radiofrequency Exposure",
    "Specific Absorption Rate",
    "ANSYS Human Body Model",
    "Pennes Bioheat Equation",
    "Thermoregulation",
    "Tissue Heating",
    "Antenna Power",
    "Distance To Source",
    "Microwave Frequencies"
  ],
  "keywords": [
    "cell phone",
    "radiation",
    "specific absorption rate",
    "SAR",
    "thermoregulatory response",
    "Pennes bioheat transfer equation",
    "ANSYS 3D human body model",
    "temperature rise",
    "850 MHz",
    "900 MHz",
    "2.1 GHz",
    "2.6 GHz"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "cell-phones",
      "weight": 0.95,
      "reason": "Study models SAR and thermal response from cell-phone-like RF exposure near the head."
    }
  ],
  "social": {
    "tweet": "Simulation study (ANSYS human body model) modeled SAR and tissue temperature rise from cell-phone-like RF exposure across 850–5100 MHz. SAR increased with higher frequency/power and decreased with distance; authors conclude modeled long-time heating stayed below a 42°C thermal danger limit.",
    "facebook": "A modeling study used an ANSYS 3D human body model to estimate SAR and temperature rise from cell-phone-like RF exposure at 850–5100 MHz. It reports higher SAR with higher frequency and radiated power and lower SAR with greater distance, and concludes modeled long-time temperature rise remained below a cited 42°C thermal danger limit.",
    "linkedin": "This engineering simulation paper modeled RF exposure from a cell-phone-like antenna using an ANSYS 3D human body model, estimating tissue SAR and temperature rise via the Pennes bioheat equation. Results indicate SAR increases with frequency and radiated power and decreases with antenna-to-head distance; the authors conclude modeled long-time heating remains below a 42°C thermal danger threshold."
  }
}
AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.1002/mop.31777
PubMed: Not supplied

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library