Controversies around electromagnetic fields and electromagnetic hypersensitivity. The construction of "low noise" public problems

2019 · Unclear · Insufficient evidence

← Research stream

UnclearInsufficient evidencePaper 1787

Study snapshot

Publicationmanual · 2019

Study typeother

Reported directionUnclear

Evidence ratingInsufficient

Abstract

Controversies around electromagnetic fields and electromagnetic hypersensitivity. The construction of "low noise" public problems Dieudonné M. [Controversies around electromagnetic fields and electromagnetic hypersensitivity. The construction of "low noise" public problems]. [Article in French] . Sante Publique. 2019 January February;Vol. 31(1):43-51. doi: 10.3917/spub.191.0043. Abstract For two decades, health effects of electromagnetic fields (EMF) and electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) have become increasingly controversial topics in France. They constitute "low noise" public problems, whose construction seems impossible to complete : they can neither be eliminated from the political agenda nor durably included. This article analyses the political process leading to this situation using qualitative data. In line with previous studies of the dispute surrounding mobile phone base stations, it shows how the controversy around EMF health effects emerged from an urban planning problem subsequently converted into a public health issue. This conversion gave rise to a spin-off controversy surrounding EHS, which quickly grew to become a controversy of its own. The study of these controversies reveals how the democracy crisis affecting public risk management increases the risk of false health alarms. It also explains why EHS fails to get as medically recognized as other functional somatic syndromes, like fibromyalgia. Medically unexplained symptoms thus appear likely to contribute significantly to health controversies. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Machine Enhanced Logic

AI evidence extraction

Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.

Study typeother

Effect directionunclear

PopulationNot supplied

Sample sizeNot supplied

ExposureNot supplied

Evidence strengthInsufficientConfidence: 74% · Peer reviewed: yes

Main findings

Using qualitative data, the article analyzes how controversies in France about EMF health effects and EHS became persistent "low noise" public problems that are difficult to either remove from or firmly embed in the political agenda. It describes how an initial urban planning dispute (notably around mobile phone base stations) was converted into a public health issue, and how this contributed to a separate controversy around EHS; it also argues that a crisis in democratic public risk management increases the risk of false health alarms and helps explain limited medical recognition of EHS compared with other functional somatic syndromes.

Outcomes measured

public controversy/political agenda dynamics around EMF health effects
electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) controversy and medical recognition
risk of false health alarms in public risk management
conversion of urban planning issues into public health issues

Limitations

Qualitative analysis; no quantitative exposure or health effect estimates reported in the abstract
No specific EMF exposure metrics (frequency, intensity, duration) described
Population and sample size not stated in the abstract

View raw extracted JSON

{
  "study_type": "other",
  "exposure": {
    "band": null,
    "source": "mobile phone base stations",
    "frequency_mhz": null,
    "sar_wkg": null,
    "duration": null
  },
  "population": null,
  "sample_size": null,
  "outcomes": [
    "public controversy/political agenda dynamics around EMF health effects",
    "electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) controversy and medical recognition",
    "risk of false health alarms in public risk management",
    "conversion of urban planning issues into public health issues"
  ],
  "main_findings": "Using qualitative data, the article analyzes how controversies in France about EMF health effects and EHS became persistent \"low noise\" public problems that are difficult to either remove from or firmly embed in the political agenda. It describes how an initial urban planning dispute (notably around mobile phone base stations) was converted into a public health issue, and how this contributed to a separate controversy around EHS; it also argues that a crisis in democratic public risk management increases the risk of false health alarms and helps explain limited medical recognition of EHS compared with other functional somatic syndromes.",
  "effect_direction": "unclear",
  "limitations": [
    "Qualitative analysis; no quantitative exposure or health effect estimates reported in the abstract",
    "No specific EMF exposure metrics (frequency, intensity, duration) described",
    "Population and sample size not stated in the abstract"
  ],
  "evidence_strength": "insufficient",
  "confidence": 0.74,
  "peer_reviewed_likely": "yes",
  "keywords": [
    "electromagnetic fields",
    "electromagnetic hypersensitivity",
    "EHS",
    "controversy",
    "public problem",
    "France",
    "mobile phone base stations",
    "risk management",
    "false health alarms",
    "functional somatic syndromes",
    "fibromyalgia",
    "qualitative data"
  ],
  "suggested_hubs": [
    {
      "slug": "who-icnirp",
      "weight": 0.22,
      "reason": "Discusses public risk management and controversy around EMF health effects (policy/governance framing), though no specific WHO/ICNIRP mention in abstract."
    }
  ]
}

AI can be wrong. Always verify against the paper.

AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.

Identifiers and source

DOI: 10.3917/spub.191.0043
PubMed: Not supplied

Read the original paper →

Related papers

← Back to the Research Library