‘Proof of EHS beyond all reasonable doubt’
← Research stream‘Proof of EHS beyond all reasonable doubt’ Michael Bevington. ‘Proof of EHS beyond all reasonable doubt’. Comment on: Leszczynski D. Review of the scientific evidence on the individual sensitivity to electromagnetic fields (EHS). Rev Environ Health 2021; doi:…
Study snapshot
Abstract
‘Proof of EHS beyond all reasonable doubt’ Michael Bevington. ‘Proof of EHS beyond all reasonable doubt’. Comment on: Leszczynski D. Review of the scientific evidence on the individual sensitivity to electromagnetic fields (EHS). Rev Environ Health 2021; doi: 10.1515/reveh-2021-0038. Reviews on Environmental Health, vol. , no. , 2021, pp. 000010151520210101. doi.org No abstract Open access letter: degruyter.com
AI evidence extraction
Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.
Main findings
‘Proof of EHS beyond all reasonable doubt’ Michael Bevington. ‘Proof of EHS beyond all reasonable doubt’. Comment on: Leszczynski D. Review of the scientific evidence on the individual sensitivity to electromagnetic fields (EHS). Rev Environ Health 2021; doi:…
Outcomes measured
- electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS)
Limitations
- No abstract provided; content and findings cannot be extracted from the supplied text.
- Exposure characteristics (frequency, source, dose) not described in the supplied text.
- No methods, population, or results reported in the supplied text.
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "other",
"exposure": {
"band": null,
"source": null,
"frequency_mhz": null,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": null
},
"population": null,
"sample_size": null,
"outcomes": [
"electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS)"
],
"main_findings": null,
"effect_direction": "unclear",
"limitations": [
"No abstract provided; content and findings cannot be extracted from the supplied text.",
"Exposure characteristics (frequency, source, dose) not described in the supplied text.",
"No methods, population, or results reported in the supplied text."
],
"evidence_strength": "insufficient",
"confidence": 0.62,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "unknown",
"keywords": [
"EHS",
"electromagnetic hypersensitivity",
"comment",
"letter",
"Reviews on Environmental Health"
],
"suggested_hubs": []
}AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.
Identifiers and source
DOI: 10.1515/reveh-2021-0038
PubMed: Not supplied
Related papers
- Dariusz Leszczynski responds to comments of Maël Dieudonné on Leszczynski's review of the scientific evidence on the individual sensitivity to electromagnetic fields (EHS). 2023
- A mechanistic understanding of human magnetoreception validates the phenomenon of electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) 2025
- Sensory Processing Sensitivity, and Not Gender, Drives Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity and Nature 2024
- Prevalence and correlation of multiple chemical sensitivity and electromagnetic hypersensitivity with age, sex, and depression in the Japanese population: a retrospective study 2023
- The lack of international and national health policies to protect persons with self-declared electromagnetic hypersensitivity 2022
- Electromagnetic hypersensitivity close to mobile phone base stations – a case study in Stockholm, Sweden 2022