Why we do not agree with the reassuring conclusions of the report on radiofrequencies and cancer of the Italian National Institute of Health
← Research streamWhy we do not agree with the reassuring conclusions of the report on radiofrequencies and cancer of the Italian National Institute of Health Di Ciaula A, Terracini B. Why we do not agree with the reassuring conclusions of the report on radiofrequencies and ca…
Study snapshot
Abstract
Why we do not agree with the reassuring conclusions of the report on radiofrequencies and cancer of the Italian National Institute of Health Di Ciaula A, Terracini B. Why we do not agree with the reassuring conclusions of the report on radiofrequencies and cancer of the Italian National Institute of Health. [Article in Italian], Epidemiol Prev. 2019 Sep-Dec;43(5- 6):314-316. doi: 10.19191/EP19.5-6.P314.097. No abstract. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
AI evidence extraction
Structured fields below were generated from the paper’s abstract and metadata to make the evidence easier to inspect. Automated extraction may be incomplete or incorrect; verify important details against the original paper.
Main findings
Why we do not agree with the reassuring conclusions of the report on radiofrequencies and cancer of the Italian National Institute of Health Di Ciaula A, Terracini B. Why we do not agree with the reassuring conclusions of the report on radiofrequencies and ca…
Outcomes measured
- cancer
Limitations
- No abstract available; findings and methods not described in provided text.
- Appears to be a commentary/disagreement with another report rather than original empirical research (based on title only).
View raw extracted JSON
{
"study_type": "policy",
"exposure": {
"band": "RF",
"source": null,
"frequency_mhz": null,
"sar_wkg": null,
"duration": null
},
"population": null,
"sample_size": null,
"outcomes": [
"cancer"
],
"main_findings": null,
"effect_direction": "unclear",
"limitations": [
"No abstract available; findings and methods not described in provided text.",
"Appears to be a commentary/disagreement with another report rather than original empirical research (based on title only)."
],
"evidence_strength": "insufficient",
"confidence": 0.55,
"peer_reviewed_likely": "unknown",
"keywords": [
"radiofrequencies",
"RF",
"cancer",
"Italian National Institute of Health",
"commentary",
"Epidemiol Prev"
],
"suggested_hubs": [
{
"slug": "who-icnirp",
"weight": 0.35,
"reason": "Discusses disagreement with reassuring conclusions of an institutional report on RF and cancer (institutional risk assessment context)."
}
]
}AI-extracted fields are generated from the abstract and metadata and may be incomplete or incorrect. This material is for informational purposes and is not medical advice.
Identifiers and source
DOI: 10.19191/ep19.5-6.p314.097
PubMed: Not supplied
Related papers
- Carl Blackman discusses ELF and RF health effects 2016
- Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields, mobile phones, and health effects: where are we now? 2019
- Exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields and risk of cancer: Epidemiology is not enough! 2024
- Spots with Extremely High Radiofrequency Radiation After Deployment of 5G Base Stations in 2024
- Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields from Mobile Phones and Fructose Consumption Coalesce to 2023
- Investigation of the Adverse Health Effects of Cell Phone Radiation and Propose Solutions to Minimize 2024